[BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?

[Peter Carson]

Hello Mike,
I'm interested that you use a blue filter for your comet images. Does that 
significantly reduce the light pollution without adversely affecting the 
comet ? I know some other comet observers image through a blue filter to 
increase the contrast of an ion tail.
I assume your light pollution is not from LED street lighting which emit 
strongly in the blue. However I do photometry on my images so a blue filter 
would spoil the raw data.

Mike and Andrew,
My skies, on a moonless good quality night, are usually around SQM 18.8 from 
dusk to around 1am. They generally improve between 1am and 5am to around SQM 
19.2 but can very occasionally reach SQM 19.65, particularly when there is a 
northerly air flow across the country which there was at the time of my 
images on the 16th.
Andrew is just plain spoilt with 21+ skies.

Your (and my) images do demonstrate that useful comet imaging can be done 
from an urban light polluted location which, apart from Andrew, is where the 
majority of people live.
Regards
Peter

-----Original Message----- 
From: Andrew Robertson
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:32 PM
To: 'BAA Comets discussion list'
Subject: Re: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?

Blimey, I think SQM-L 21.0 is a poor night where I am in Norfolk.

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Comets-disc [mailto:comets-disc-bounces at britastro.org] On Behalf Of 
Michael Oates
Sent: 18 January 2016 15:47
To: BAA Comets discussion list <comets-disc at britastro.org>
Subject: Re: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?

Peter,

Thanks for the update, yes your image shows it more clearly as a fork. I 
note you included an SQM reading of 19.58 on your image. Mine was SQM-L 
18.87 which is better than usual.
The norm is about 18.5/6 here in Manchester and I have never seen it reach 
19.00!

That is why I always image with a filter, blue being a good one for comets.

Mike

>Hi Andrew,
>Yes I agree the ion tail is forked, I don't think 2013US10 has grown
>another separate tail.
>Some of my previous images show the tenuous infilling you mention
>between the two tails. My image from the 16th was taken under hazy sky
>conditions so doesn't show it well and its too close in to the nucleus.
>I had intended to use my 100mm refractor to get the image on that night
>as this would have provided a field of view nearly 2 degrees wide and
>better displayed the comet. The sky had been clear since sunset and I
>had been out earlier in the evening, but decided to go to bed and get
>up before dawn because I was feeling unwell with a cold. When I got up
>at 04.45am the sky was deteriorating fast and I didn't have time to
>swap the camera over. I should have persevered later into the night
>before and just taken a bigger box of tissues out to the observatory with 
>me to mop my nose up!!
>
>Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Robertson
>Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 11:26 AM
>To: 'BAA Comets discussion list'
>Subject: Re: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?
>
>Your image shows it more as a fork in the ion tail rather than a 3rd
>tail Peter. I did look at it last night about 1.30am after the moon had
>largely got out of the way but I was only using my OMC 200 albeit a
>very high contrast scope. In that there was a very large coma with a
>much larger tenuous extension filled in over about 90 degrees.
>
>Andrew
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Comets-disc [mailto:comets-disc-bounces at britastro.org] On Behalf
>Of Peter Carson
>Sent: 18 January 2016 11:21
>To: BAA Comets discussion list <comets-disc at britastro.org>
>Subject: Re: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?
>
>Hi Mike,
>I imaged C/2013US10 107 minutes after you on the 16th Jan. My image,
>which is closer in to the coma, also shows a streamer heading off
>slightly south of west.
>Full details are on the image.
>http://www.astromania.co.uk/2013US10_20160116_0535_PCarson.jpg
>
>All the best
>Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Robertson
>Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 8:52 AM
>To: 'BAA Comets discussion list'
>Subject: Re: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?
>
>More noticeable with the star trails removed. Interesting.
>
>Andrew
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Comets-disc [mailto:comets-disc-bounces at britastro.org] On Behalf
>Of Michael Oates
>Sent: 17 January 2016 18:32
>To: BAA Comets discussion list <comets-disc at britastro.org>
>Subject: [BAA Comets] C/2013 US10 Catalina - Apparent 3rd tail ?
>
>Hi,
>
>There is what appears to be a faint third tail between the main dust
>and gas tails.
>
>45 subs of 60s each, all registered on the comet. Full details on the
>images.
>
>With trailed stars:
>http://astrob.in/236516/B/
>
>Stars removed by using rejection during integration.
>http://astrob.in/236516/0/
>
>Regards,
>
>Mike
>_______________________________________________
>Comets-disc mailing list
>Comets-disc at britastro.org
>http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc
>
>_______________________________________________
>Comets-disc mailing list
>Comets-disc at britastro.org
>http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc
>_______________________________________________
>Comets-disc mailing list
>Comets-disc at britastro.org
>http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc
>
>_______________________________________________
>Comets-disc mailing list
>Comets-disc at britastro.org
>http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc
>
>_______________________________________________
>Comets-disc mailing list
>Comets-disc at britastro.org
>http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc
_______________________________________________
Comets-disc mailing list
Comets-disc at britastro.org
http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc

_______________________________________________
Comets-disc mailing list
Comets-disc at britastro.org
http://lists.britastro.org/mailman/listinfo/comets-disc