Observation by Grant Privett: Gyulbudaghian Outline

Uploaded by

Grant Privett

Observer

Grant Privett

Observed

2023 Jan 20 - 19:00

Uploaded

2023 Jan 21 - 16:57

Objects

Gyulbudaghian's variable nebula

Equipment
  • 300mm f/4 Newtonian
  • Trius 694 mono
  • NEQ6+Rowan belt upgrade
Exposure

150x 30s

Location

Near Salisbury

Target name

Gyulbudaghian's nebula

Title

Gyulbudaghian Outline

About this image

I stacked some images of  PV Cephei and Gyulbudaghian's nebula. The star itself isn't very faint, but the nebula remains very dim - though you can see an outline of the fan above and to the left PV Cep. It was obvious while stacking the images that the dim lobe of the nebulosity, below the star, was brighter than where the fan should be! 

Its a shame that the focus drifted so far during the exposure - first object of the night.

Looking at it now, I am struck by how similar the cross of stars to the left of the nebula is, compared to the Southern Cross. With Gyulbudaghian standing in for the Coalsack.

Files associated with this observation
Like this image
Comments
Mike Harlow
Mike Harlow, 2023 Jan 21 - 17:41 UTC

Nice image Grant.  Your southern lobe is brighter than my southern lobe!!! I'm guessing you don't use a filter (?) whereas I use a luminance filter to avoid any potential aberrations from my prime focus corrector. I'm not seeing anything longer than 700nm. [I may try it without to see if there is a real difference].

It would be really nice if some of the serious imagers out there would start taking colour images of this nebula...it's beyond my limited processing skills and bank balance for remote imaging. Or maybe the Deep Sky section could lob some funding at it...?

Mike.

Grant Privett
Grant Privett, 2023 Jan 22 - 12:10 UTC

No, no filters yet here. Possibly later this year.

Did you mean colour as in R,G,B or R,V, I bands? I vaguely recall doing a short Faulkes North session on it (about 10 years ago) using filters and there was no B band, so I just used V,R,I. Might try and dig that out.

Yeah, I'm impressed when I see exposures >10 hours on remote scopes, but I assume most of those are scopes hosted there by the imager. Too expensive for me. I obviously made all the wrong career choices. 

Copyright of all images and other observations submitted to the BAA remains with the owner of the work. Reproduction of work by third parties is expressly forbidden without the consent of the copyright holder. By submitting images to this online gallery, you grant the BAA permission to reproduce them in any of our publications.