.

A few points in response.

1. My post perhaps could have been worded better. Where I said “observations that are new” what I meant was those that are newly posted not necessarily the most current so while there was an apparent contradiction it was not real or intended. My bad!
2. The downside remains for anybody who like me wants to see fresh posts is that they would need to trawl through to find them.
3. The point about it being for current observations not an archive is interesting. I do not recall seeing anything about that elsewhere though I certainly would agree with it. Perhaps the fact needs highlighting on the submission page?

David.