Sigma Bootis

Home Forums Spectroscopy Sigma Bootis

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #574594
    Kate Kay
    Participant

    Hello, I’ve been working my way through the constellation of Bootes comparing the different F, G, and K stars. But I’m having trouble understanding sigma Bootis.

    I’ve looked up four websites and discovered it is an, F1, or an F3, or an F4VkF2mF1. Sinbad gave me the last combination and I’m leaning to believing that one. It also said it was possibly a delta scuti star, but I really don’t understand all those letters, unless it means it’s a combination of all three classes.

    Can anyone assist please, as I’m hoping to do a zoom talk in two weeks?

    Thank you. 

    kate

    #582366
    Robin Leadbeater
    Participant

    Hi Kate,

    Spectral classification is a rather inexact science as many stars show anomalies which don’t fit neatly into the simple MK classification system. As a result  you get different opinions for the classification even for non variable stars (Variable stars can change their classification with time for example due to temperature changes caused by pulsations)

    A good source for spectral classifications is Brian Skiff’s huge catalogue which has all the published classifications with the references for currently approaching  a million stars

    http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=B/mk

    Here we see for sigma Boo a range of classifications dating from 1897 to 2001

    F4V kF2 mF1 is the latest one and comes from a paper by Richard Gray who is famous in stellar classification circles and for example co-authored the current “bible” on the subject “Stellar Spectral Classification” by Gray and Corbally

    The paper referenced is here

    http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-ref?bibcode=2001AJ….121.2148G

    There he notes that sigma Boo is metal weak and looking in the footnotes to  table I (page 2155)  he explains the multiple classification nomenclature he has used.  So for sigma Boo we have a metal weak star with the traditional classification F4V, presumably based on the Balmer lines  but  based on the strength of the Ca II K lines it looks like an F2 and based on the metal line spectrum it looks like an F1

    Robin

    #582369
    Kate Kay
    Participant

    Thank you Robin

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.