Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 882 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Outburst of faint periodic comet 285P/LINEAR #611949
    Nick James
    Participant

    This comet continues to fade and become more diffuse following its outburst on Aug 1. Thank you to all of you who have sent in observations. Please keep observing this object as it expands and fades.

    The remarkable weather in SE England means that I have managed to image it every night since the outburst was announced on August 6. My lightcurve and a rather jerky GIF showing the development is attached to this post. The comet has now faded to around 15.7. Still a long way to get back to its ephemeris magnitude of 19.5.

    in reply to: Problems accessing member areas of the website #611862
    Nick James
    Participant

    And I see that you are now a victim of the very formal, full name problem reported elsewhere!

    in reply to: Discussions #611239
    Nick James
    Participant

    I think David’s point is a good one. I much preferred the previous behaviour where, once you were logged in on a particular machine, you were logged in forever. I know that it is only a few extra clicks but it does mean that there is more of a barrier to replying and interacting with content than there used to be.

    in reply to: Redshift #610560
    Nick James
    Participant

    That’s true but I was thinking of something with a bit more mass and capability like a small interstellar space probe. Accelerating charged particles to a significant proportion of the speed of light is relatively easy. Accelerating a spacecraft, even a very small one, is a lot harder.

    in reply to: V482 Cyg #610491
    Nick James
    Participant

    I mentioned this star during the Sky Notes at the BAA meeting in London today. Here is an image taken when I got home. It is unfiltered so the star is still quite bright. I assume that, a bit like R CrB, it will be quite red when it fades.

    in reply to: Redshift #610429
    Nick James
    Participant

    That’s true when z is cosmological but the point I was trying to make is that you can have z > 1 without having to invoke the expansion of space or any non-flat geometries. The article implies that you can’t.

    in reply to: Fireball 23.40UT #610417
    Nick James
    Participant

    Headline on the front page of the site today from Jim Rowe (https://britastro.org/2022/12th-may-fireball). It looks as if this one might have dropped 100g or so of meteorites over a rather hilly bit of South Wales. An excellent piece of work by all of the camera networks in UKFAll.

    in reply to: Fireball 23.40UT #610295
    Nick James
    Participant

    I just caught the very beginning of the trail on my SW facing UK004F camera at Chelmsford. This is the streak on the right side of the attached image. The GMN trajectory solver has a trajectory from UK0002, UK000W, UK003N, UK004F and UK004X which you can see here (https://tammojan.github.io/meteormap/) if you select the latest_daily solutions. It was also picked up by 3 French and 2 British cameras of the Fripon network and their analysis is here: https://fireball.fripon.org/displaymultiple.php?id=17507.

    in reply to: PR Her #610129
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, nothing there that I can see.

    Nick James
    Participant

    Paul, yes that’s the one.

    Nick James
    Participant

    Cees Bassa responded to my video pointing to this tweet from Jonathan McDowell:

    https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1520284820450025472

    It was the de-orbit burn for the Angara AM second stage launched from Plesetsk yesterday.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Nick James.
    in reply to: Brookhaven on the market #609878
    Nick James
    Participant

    It is one of my favourite books too. Lovely descriptions of a lost time. I bought a second hand hardback of the 1967 edition a while ago for around 50p.

    $550K for a big house and ten acres seems a steal but it’s not selling. I’ve just had a nose on Google Streetview. Looks very nice although there has been a lot of development around there since Peltier’s day.

    in reply to: Ron Arbour #609669
    Nick James
    Participant

    I was honoured to speak at Ron’s funeral on Monday. It was very well attended and many BAA friends were present. An obituary will appear in the Journal in due course but, for now, I attach my tribute.

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Winchester Weekend 2022 #609667
    Nick James
    Participant

    It was a brilliant weekend and my personal highlight was the Steve and Dave double act on Sunday. A very entertaining presentation about the Crayford Dobsonians. All the other talks throughout the weekend were great too. Shame I missed the Friday night.

    Thanks very much to Ann and Alan and everyone else involved in arranging it.

    in reply to: possible nova in M31 #609165
    Nick James
    Participant

    I think it is at least the sixth this year.

    Have a look here for an up-to-date list. They often don’t get announced in ATELs.
    Currently TNS[/url] is the main database now but some discoverers still post on the TOCP.

    There tend to be several novae a month in M31 but a lot of people are looking for them so it is hard to claim a discovery. George Carey got AT2022eng recently along with Kamil and the Czech team.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Nick James.
    • This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Nick James.
    in reply to: Detection and observation of Earth impactor 2022 EB5 #609018
    Nick James
    Participant

    I’m not surprised it got silly. The slug was an odd one though. It was the unit of gravitational mass in the FPS system but I don’t think it got used much.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Nick James.
    in reply to: Images and attachments to forum posts #609000
    Nick James
    Participant

    Thanks for explaining that Dominic. I know that a huge amount of work has gone into the new site and it will take some time to iron out the problems but I didn’t know whether this was by design or not.

    in reply to: Detection and observation of Earth impactor 2022 EB5 #608992
    Nick James
    Participant

    This was an interesting event. A few minutes before impact it would have been visible at around 11th magnitude moving rapidly across the sky as seen from the UK.

    I like examples of NTUs (non-technical units) when describing the characteristics of astronomical objects. Bill Barton alerted me to this classic example in the Mail Online.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10610491/Asteroid-half-size-giraffe-strikes-Earth-coast-Iceland.html

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Ron Arbour #608602
    Nick James
    Participant

    I first met Ron not long after he became a TV star for his early recovery, with Alan Young, of 1P/Halley and have always marvelled at the quality of his work. He was very innovative and came up with loads of excellent ideas including is own cold camera and comet offset guiding attachment. There is a pretty good summary of Ron and his work along with a photo of Ron with his home-built 16-inch here:

    http://mstecker.com/pages/apparbour.htm

    His SNe discovery record is testament to his skill and dedication. Ron always regretted replacing that telescope with an “inferior” commercial instrument and mount.

    I will miss our regular email exchanges and my annual meeting with Ron and Pat after Winchester when I would discover what new equipment Ron was testing, usually in the living room. Pat was very tolerant.

    Another of the BAA astronomy greats gone. Deepest condolences to Pat.

    in reply to: New website feedback #608389
    Nick James
    Participant

    Not just images but files (PDFs, text files). We used to be able to do that.

Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 882 total)