Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nick James
ParticipantThat’s not the way it works David. I’m the Director so I take credit if it turns out well. As a Mr. Swan you can take the blame if it fizzles!
BTW the Sun (newspaper not star) is already hyping it and it appears to have its own Twitter account.
Nick James
ParticipantGreat image from Hubble. I have an image from Chelmsford taken 14 hours earlier and it is interesting to compare the two. You can see why having a 2.4m telescope in space is such a good idea. In three days time it will have been in orbit for 30 years. Let’s hope they keep it working for a long time to come.
Nick James
ParticipantI’ve put a timelapse of that all-sky video here. This is made from 1s max stacks of the video frames animated at x5 real time.
Nick James
ParticipantThe launch is scheduled for 2132 (BST) on May 27 and Dragon comes over the UK 15 minutes later. Steve is saying that you could watch the launch on TV (at 2132) and go into your garden 15 minutes later (at 2147) to see the Dragon go over. You could, if you wish, also see an ISS pass at 2120 (BST).
Nick James
ParticipantDragon will be lower than ISS at this point so it will go into shadow sooner. I would think at 21:30 (BST I assume) it will still be illuminated. The twilight sky will be quite bright though.
Nick James
ParticipantThanks for that Steve. It is always fun to see a spacecraft go over only 15 mins or so after it has launched from the Cape. This one will be particularly interesting because of the manned aspect. Sometimes there are interesting things to see as well if the second stage of Falcon 9 is venting propellants.
Nick James
ParticipantProxima is too far south for us at a declination of 62 deg S. Wolf 359 is a bit further away (7.9 light years compared to proxima’s 4.2) but it is visible from the northern hemisphere as faint red dwarf in Leo.
Nick James
ParticipantIt’s a nice outreach activity and the baseline is certainly much larger than the 2au baseline that Gaia has but the resolution of the LORRI camera on NH in 4×4 bin mode is only around 5 arcsec (2.3 m FL, 13.5 um pixels). The current Gaia DR2 error for the parallax of Proxima is 0.2 milli-arcsec (mas). Assuming a high SNR in the images LORRI might get astrometry accurate to 50-100 mas. The 25 times improvement in baseline won’t compensate for the factor of 250 loss in precision. The NASA publicity doesn’t really make this very clear.
Nick James
ParticipantJohn,
Yes, the current orbit from MPC for C/2019 Y1 (ATLAS) gives positions which are off by 5′.2 in RA and 12′.8 in Dec.
The position from JPL Horizons is much closer.
Mid time: 2020-04-15 20:23:52, S up.
Nick James
ParticipantThe weather didn’t cooperate last night so I have no new images of C/2019 Y4 (ATLAS). I’ve been playing with images taken over the last few nights using FITSwork and iterative Gaussian sharpening (thanks to Nick Haigh for putting me on to this). These images show the development of the inner coma region over three nights. The first two were taken with by camera in 1×1 bin mode. Unfortunately I don’t have this for the last night so I have used a resampled versin of my normal 2×2 bin mode. All use the same Gaussian sharpening params (r=4.13, 20 iterations, 100% strength). You can see the components separating as the move relative to one another.
Nick James
ParticipantNice image. Yes, it is still surprisingly good given all the turmoil going on in the centre!
Nick James
ParticipantThe amazing run of clear nights continues combined with being at home every night means that I have imaged this comet on 7 consecutive nights now. This early stack tonight is an weak unsharp mask on the coma region showing the various components. The one to the top right (NW) is probably the residual nucleus.
Nick James
ParticipantAbsolutely sure. This is a sigma-clip stack tracked on the comet’s motion. Stars will be faint streaks. Also this appears on multiple stacks always in the same position relative to the comet. And loads of other observers have imaged it…
Nick James
ParticipantThis image from tonight is at an image scale of 1″.29 per pixel with FWHM = 2″.9. It is an average stack of 57x60s frames with local flux subtracted using a 6×6 median. It is upsampled by a factor of 4 for display. There is a clear condensation to the NW of the bright extended coma. Interestingly, if you do astrometry on this condensation you get a position which is within 2 arcsec of the position predicted by the orbit using astrometry up to March 25. Current astrometry which is centroided on the bright elliptical coma is off by around 11 arcsec now. This condensation wasn’t visible in my images last night.
Is it what remains of the nucleus? We’ll find out over the next few days.
Nick James
ParticipantThat is very interesting, particularly the continuing strong C2 emission line. We now seem to have a cloud of rubble moving down the tail but the total magnitude is also falling which would imply that there was no sudden release of gas into the coma at the breakup. This implies that the comet had pretty much exhausted its volatiles before it broke up so we should now see the outer come fade and dissipate since it has no source at the centre. It would be good to follow this spectroscopically as long as you can.
Nick James
ParticipantYes, I’m afraid C/2019 Y4 (ATLAS) looks as if it will soon be an ex-comet. Only a week ago I gave our first webinar talking about prospects for this object. Now I think it is probably a cloud of rubble. As Comet section Director I’m not having much luck with comets!
In my images over the last few nights I have not seen any fragments in the tail. What I have seen is a gradual reduction in the peak pixel ADU count and a flattening/broadening of the downtail coma brightness profile. This plot shows a cut through the photocentre aligned on the tail PA (positive offsets are tailward) for five nights from March 25 to April 7. You can see that peak pixel ADU falls from around 8000 to 1200 in that time (a fade of around 2 magnitudes) and the profile is broader with a more gradual tailward slope in the later images. It looks to me as if the nucleus has completely fragmented and what we are seeing is a cloud of rubble migrating down the tail. This explains the large astrometric residuals in RA since the photometric centroid is no longer aligned with the original nucleus.
If this is correct the future of this comet is as a fainter and fainter diffuse rubble pile. Let’s see what happens and keep this under observation as long as possible. We have a ringside seat to watch the distruction of a Solar System object.
Nick James
ParticipantAs long as that only involves virtual money that’s fine.
Nick James
ParticipantI do have some Thatchers too although it is running out.
Nick James
ParticipantGreat memories and I’m already looking forward to next year when hopefully things will be back to normal. I’ll really miss it this year though. Such a shame given all the effort that Ann and Alan and others put into arranging it.
Perhaps we should set up a virtual meeting in the bar on Saturday night. I have plenty of beer since my local brewery is making home deliveries and I’m trying to keep it in business.
28 March 2020 at 8:37 pm in reply to: Help needed :) Image Venus and the Moon for Parallax Project #582176Nick James
ParticipantMine from Chelmsford is here (attached in full res). It was taken at 19:32 since clouds were coming in. I have a less overexposed one if that helps. I do have an image at 19:52 which is the closest to 8pm I have.
-
AuthorPosts