Sheridan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Paramount telescope mount – URGENT help needed #626254
    Sheridan
    Participant

    No-one spotted the obvious problem from all the error messages!
    The clutch controls were not engaged properly.
    Saved us a fortune phew.
    By the way it works fine on Sky6.
    Anyway, thanks for everyone’s input it certainly helped narrow down the problem

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Paramount telescope mount – URGENT help needed #626148
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Balance checked OK.
    I’ve been getting the attached error messages, so I checked the PC’s port settings and it might be an old serial-USB adapter so I’ll try another one.
    Also we are using Sky6 so maybe we need SkyX.
    Any ideas?

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Paramount telescope mount – URGENT help needed #626130
    Sheridan
    Participant

    These were previously done when before I tried to use the scope:
    Install TheSkyX
    Install the driver
    Connect USB cable to mount
    Set mount into balance position and reengage the gear. (Not sure what reengage the gear means)

    I then:
    Power up mount
    Sync the laptop time in Windows
    Run TheSkyX
    Made sure your location is set (Google earth can give long/lat)
    Told TheSkyX to Connect to mount (yes it’s an older mount and selected the COM port first)
    Told TheSkyX to Home (listen for 2 tones as it slews in RA/Dec)
    From then on the mount keeps constantly beeping and will not respond to slew requests with out giving an error.

    I live a few miles from the obsevatory and can’t interact with an advisor as I try different things, it needs to be set up urgently and we are happy to pay someone to help if anyone is available.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Paramount telescope mount – URGENT help needed #626119
    Sheridan
    Participant

    We have been given the mount and I’ve tried following the manual however…
    I switched the scope on and loaded The Sky software, the software recognised the scope and when I clicked on Home it slewed to a position different to where I found it.

    I managed to slew to an object so got quite excited. I tried the joystick hand controller and this only worked in E-W not in N-S.

    I checked the time which was correct and then checked the location which was set for somewhere in the US. So I changed this to the exact lat/long for the observatory.

    From then on nothing worked, the scope started bleeping and the was no way to stop it doing so.

    Slewing gives an error code: 2003

    When I clicked on Home I got error code 212.
    We would gladly pay you out of club funds to help us set it up.
    Could you respond to: sw@clock-tower.com or phone 07767 788146?

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Partial solar eclipse of 2022 October 25 #613259
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Success from near Milton Keynes

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Old BAA Circulars #585149
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Many years ago after I scanned and digitised all the BAA Journals from 1890 I scanned all the Circulars, The Moon, the Handbooks, Memoirs and several of Waterfield, Lenham, Peek and Elger material.

    It is strange that apart from the Journals this material is not accessible to members in the same way as the Journals.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Gordon Taylor #582356
    Sheridan
    Participant

    I took over from Gordon as Director of the Computing Section. His main role was the BAA Handbook and he passed me all his software written in the oldest version of BASIC I’d seen, but it worked. I visited his place many times and he was incredibly friendly and helpful. He was still running into his early 90s and was full of beans. I’ll certainly miss him.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: News item – Solar eclipse of March 20 #576868
    Sheridan
    Participant

    I may be wrong but the latest Sky Notes by Brian Mills (Vol.125 No.3 P.184) reproduces data from the Handbook without any credit or mention whatsoever.

    Surely the Handbook should be mentioned out of courtesy.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Club/Society web site hosting #576867
    Sheridan
    Participant

    With such vast financial resources this is something that the BAA could take on and save affiliated societies money. Rather telling that it is down to the RAS to provide this service to amateur societies!

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576675
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Please let’s end this discussion. There have been some very good postings, but I still think that the absolute beginner should experiment with simple images, and only then graduate to using calibration frames. Graham’s book is aimed at absolute beginners and should have been reviewed as such.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576673
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Alex, I’m afraid that Graham has gone for good as a result of David’s unfair review. What of the future for the computing section? I wonder why David has not defended his review in public?

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576671
    Sheridan
    Participant

    The trouble is that as a result of David’s (over-critical in many people’s opinion) review we have lost an extremely valuable member of the Association and section webmaster. The Computing section’s future is in jeopardy as the workload has increased to a level that I’m not happy to bear without such a skilled and knowledgeable webmaster.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576666
    Sheridan
    Participant

    If you subtract a dark frame you are ADDING more random (thermal) noise, just as much as if you add a real data frame to the stack. If you add enough frames the random noise eventually smoothes out, and this happens whether they are dark frames or data frames. But with dark frames you are adding only noise, not signal. Therefore it is better to stack as many real data frames as you can. There is no problem using 100 data frames! Mechanical shutters in DSLRs are rated at well over 100,000 operations (MTBF) and in compact cameras the “shutter” is electronic and so should have no practical limit (something else will fail first).

    So the key is to use MANY exposures and appropriate stacking software. (Fixed-pattern noise and bad pixels are smoothed out by the fact that images taken on fixed tripods or unguided EQ mounts are all shifted in relation to each other, which the stacking process addresses.)

    As to the idea that you cannot use bottom-of-the-range cameras, that is also wrong.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576659
    Sheridan
    Participant

    I think we ought to go back to the subtitle, which explains what the book is about. David says “But I disliked the didactic style and felt the author had not thought-through at what audience it was aimed” both Graham and I were definite about the target audience as the subtitle says. Personally I prefer a didactic style, and obviously Graham does too, saying you dislike the didactic style is like saying you didn’t like the font or size of the book. Many people I have spoken to say they thought the review a bit nit-picking. The review will inevitably result in a loss of sales so Graham feels he will be out of pocket on his first self-publishing venture and we have lost his goodwill and membership.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Great new book #576650
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Surely the quickest way to put an absolute beginner is to say that calibration frames are essential. Once the beginner has mastered the basics, then they should be encouraged to look into ways of improving their images.

    Sheridan Williams

    in reply to: Handbook cover picture #576642
    Sheridan
    Participant

    Thank you for all your ideas. Have finally chosen a suitable picture… You’ll have to wait for October to see it!

    Sheridan Williams

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)