Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi,
Here’s a calibrated graph of the spectrum. Had a few headaches with this one as the spectrum isn’t the third order, it’s the second order. A bit of confusion with the image scale after 12+ years of working with spectra from WATECS…
A few “lines”, marked with an * are stellar artifacts and noisy pixels not real lines.
and here’s a list of list of catalogue lines closest to the “barycentre” of the spectrum line (as it’s called in VisualSpec)
Line Wavelength (nm) Element
1: 421.618 Fe I
2: 427.176 Fe I
3: 430.790 Fe I
4: 432.576 Fe I
5: 437.593 Fe I
6: 438.355 Fe I
7: 440.475 Fe I
8: 442.730 Fe I
9: 446.165 Fe I
10: 448.113 Mg II
11: 495.760 Fe I
12: 511.040 Fe I
13: 516.732 Mg I (Probable blend with 516.749nm Fe I)
14: 517.268 Mg I (Probable blend with 517.160nm Fe I)
15: 518.360 Mg I
16: 522.715 Fe I
17: 526.954 Fe I
18: 532.830 Fe IIf the spectrum had been a bit brighter, or shifted to either side a bit, perhaps other lines would have been observed. However as is, it looks like a simple composition of just iron, magnesium and sodium.
Interesting because it is rather un-interesting!
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
I’ve had the radio on in the background for a couple of days, interesting to hear the pings vary throughout the day.
Going to head off to Dumfries and Galloway to seek out any clear skies that may develop. Going to enjoy the show and leave the technology switched off…. well except for the cameras I’ll have, just in case… ; – )
cheers,
Bill.
Hi all,
After further observations by the NEMETODE guys it appears the meteor wasn’t an Alpha Cap. It now looks like a -4 sporadic fireball of asteroidal origin. So it was indeed a normal chunk of rock…
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi Alex,
Super results. After the excitement of the weekend, the weather has gone downhill rapidly. Don’t think I’ll get to see much but I’ll be keeping an eye out for any breaks. Although I don’t have the recording running at the moment the I was listening to the GRAVES radar last night, some very strong pings heard.
cheers,
Bill.
No, it was done with a circular polariser in front of the lens, I don’t have a large enough linear polariser for those lenses.
Anyway, one image is taken as the zero degree image, then the pol is rotated through 45 deg, then another 45 deg, then one more. Giving 0, 45, 90 and 135 degree images. Even that’s not going to be very accurate!
The polarisation functions in IRIS are used to produce the various maps.
Oddly enough on the second night, you could easily see the difference in the various frames due to the sky pol on the camera LCD display. IRIS offers several pol functions but I don’t know how it’s actually determining the various vectors to produce the images.
Everybody seems to get obsessed taking images I just wanted to try something different and see if it would work! The fact that the Rayleigh scattering/polarisation is perpendicular to the solar direction would seem to suggest it was successful after a fashion… but how accurate, who knows! That’s why I say the stronger pol nearer the nucleus could still be an artifact.
Perhaps someone else can try it…?, the comet is still around!
Hi,
An alternative look at the comet.
The polarisation of sunlight being reflected and scattered by dust particles around the nucleus and in the tail can be easily mapped.
Image one is from a sequence centred on 0050UT 19/7/20.
The lines represent the orientation and magnitude of polarisation. The light in the tail is polarised ~4%. There is other stronger polarisation, ~6% across the nucleus, possibly due to a much greater density of particles. additionally there is quite strong polarisation oriented ~60 degrees from the tail polarisation closer to the nucleus.
Initially I wasn’t sure if this was real or an artifact….
Image two is from a sequence centred on 2358UT 23/7/20.
Interestingly, is the stronger polarisation is again seen around the nucleus but with a different orientation and location. It still could be an artifact but it may suggest possible Mie scattering from larger particles. The change in position may be due the rotation of the comet, from a jet or other active area.
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi all,
Even though it is getting a little darker I’m still struggling with bright twilight when it comes to imaging at my lattitude. This is (an un-corrected in any way!) crop from a shot taken with a FLI KAF39000 camera and a 165 f2.8 lens, 3 x 30 secs through a HMC Y1 Green filter.
The filter helped take out some of the “blue sky” background. The broadening fan of the dust tail is becoming apparent.
Maybe get to try again in another couple of weeks!
Hi,
Just found this after posting my reply! Most Excellent! Do you have any spectrum to compare the Na emission to the CN at 388nm?
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
Indeed! A few comments by “science editors” and that’s that! I have no hope of seeing the thing again until this weekend if the weather forecast is to be believed. I was down on the south coast last weekend and it still surprises me the difference a few degrees in latitude makes. I got a view from Tunbridge Wells and it was quite amazing early Sunday morning, sadly I had no gear with me. It also the furthest south I’ve ever seen NLC!
With the sun a little lower maybe get some better images this weekend from back at 55.5N. I’m intrigued by the spectroscopy results from Robin, there are some unusual meteors with extremely high sodium emission too. Whether they are related I’m not sure but it makes the comet even more interesting!
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
There have been a couple of pictures circulating on twitter apparently showing a yellowish ion trail. Seemed entirely possible to me, given the observations made on Hale-Bopp in 1997. I ventured that the colouration was probably real.
There’s an interesting subsection in the book Cometary Science by Crovisier and Encrenaz, CUP, 2000, pg 44 on the Hale-Bopp sodium tail, it has the phrase “the origin of cometary sodium is still a puzzle”. Seems still to be after 23 years!
I think it boils, literally and metaphorically!, down to the refractories in the nucleus, this may just be a quirk of the comets’ own formation. It’s there, so it must be in the minerals present.
In my spectroscopic meteor observations there are occasional meteors which exhibit very strong sodium emission also, I have often wondered if they somehow related to particular comets. The standard thinking seems to be that they are “fresh” meteoroids from which the sodium had still be be “boiled off”, so maybe yes, maybe no….
Do you have higher resolution spectra of the comet? I have seen nothing of the comet for a week and probably won’t for another week! The only thing I have for “stellar” spectroscopy now is a star analyser, I’ll give that a go if the opportunity presents itself.
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi all,
I had my first decent evening for the month on 7/8 July 2020. 2020 F3 had just become circumpolar from my latitude but at 56N it is still very bright even at 00UT. Anyway, a cloud bank situated on the horizon seemed to have the remarkable property of being synchronised with the earths rotation and sat exactly over the comet for two hours before allowing me a brief observing slot!
As the cloud was dancing around I took a few shots through 300mm f4 and 400mm f4 lenses. Being very amateurish and rushed, I didn’t even note the time accurately, all I can say is that it was around 0010UT 8/7/20 very faint to naked eye. Image is a stack of 11 x 1 sec but background was just too bright to get the ion tail. Looked nice in 11×80 binoculars, tail maybe 1/2 to 3/4 degree long to me eyes.
Then the cloud covered it again and resumed its synchronised motion all the way to 03UT! grrrrr…
Sometimes it is really difficult not to take it personally…. ; – )
Might get to see it again next week….
However, as compensation, there were some remarkable NLC that night!
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
Is it Ernie or Stan…? ; – )
Have you had a look at at he NEMETODE site? (http://www.nemetode.org/) I know that there are efforts to get all the various groups to report in a common format but knowing people, everybody will stick with what they’re comfortable with, I do, it’s only a hobby after all!
However, the NEMETODE guys have a ton of material and an excellent email group run by Alex. You might want to contact him and see if any of those guys caught it. You should be able to contact him through this site (if you haven’t already done so…!)
cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
Thanks Jack.
When I get a bit of time I’m hoping to review all of this years captures to try and get some numbers on how many exhibit this type of behaviour. Maybe a summer time project when I switch my gear off for a clean up around the solstice.
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi Dennis,
Me too! It is a right royal pain in the celestial bum for my HD meteor camera system!
Progress, they say….
Cheers,
Bill.
Great catch,
It looks like a stony job with a very strong magnesium line and early start sodium. If you get an orbit, I’d bet on a low-ish Vg….
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
I captured another remarkable “melting” meteor last night. Meteor seems to fragment into a “cloud” of material then trail behind the faster moving meteor head.
Cheers,
Bill.
Hi,
Being away from home over the new year I was unable to do any spectroscopy. Given the weather I don’t think that would have been very successful anyway… ; – )
I did, however, attempt some visual observing from where I was, just outside Dundee, and for a brief spell I thought is was going to hold. Alas, no but I did see 2 Qua’s and 1 Spo in just under an hour. Nice to see the real thing from time to time…
My radio system kept vigil on my behalf and I was surprised to see that in terms of the maximum meteor count this years QUA’s pipped the 2019 GEM’s for the highest rate. 156 QUA’s 04-05UT verse’s 143 GEM’s also 04-05UT. Of course the GEM rate is pretty high over a much longer period…
I’ll put together some graphs at some point but it looks like it would have been a nice show given some clear skies.
cheers,
Bill.
