Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yes, the flash triggered all of my cameras (UFO and RMS). My SE recorded it but behind thick cloud. My all sky showed that the sky was completely cloudy in Chelmsford at the time. Steve Bosley and Stan Armstrong both had clear skies and have nice images of it.
There can’t be many 0.8m telescopes on LP: https://www.astrosysteme.com/references/asa-az800-in-spain/.
There is a high res map of the lava flow here. You are a little way off the top of the frame.
Alex. I’ll pass on your request and I’ll see if we can make it as dark as Headingly on a mid-summer’s day.
Eeek. A bit close! At least we don’t have to worry about volcanic dust clouds when observing from the UK. There is some quite spectacular footage on the Reuters site here. The pictures from El Paso and Los Llanos look very familiar.
The reason for the pre-booking is that the IoP have decided to restrict the numbers in the lecture theatre to around 70 and this helps us assess how many people are likely to come. I doubt if that will be a problem for the AGM but it will be potentially more of a problem for Christmas. As with everything Covid-related things can change quickly but I hope that this meeting can go ahead since I am really looking forward to getting back to face-to-face meetings after a long break.
In the last few months I’ve been to many crowded events and have managed to survive but I know that some people will prefer to stay away, or are just too far away for convenient travel, so we will be livestreaming the meeting on Youtube. The IoP have been very helpful with this and it will probably become a permanent feature.
I don’t have a view on whether planetary observers should have north or south up but I do wish that they would be consistent. When I’m doing Sky Notes I either have to have some slides with the original caption text upside down or the planet just flips back and forth in an irritating way.
Don’t get me started on the random orientations and even mirror imaged views that you see for Deep Sky objects (and also comets if truth be told).
The summary on the National Trust collections page is “interesting”. Next time a nearby supernova goes off we clearly need to go around wearing hard hats.
That’s a very impressive spectrum given that the current total magnitude of 4P is about 12. It is one of the brighter comets around at the moment and definitely worth following although it is a morning object. Current images are here.
The last two nights it has been brighter than mag 15 so the outburst looks to be on schedule. Tonight (Sept 6) I have 14.7 unfiltered.
Here’s an image taken this morning (Aug 10) from Chelmsford. It is around mag 16.1 in a 9.2 arcsec aperture. My most recent previous image was July 29 when it was 17.1.
CBET 5007 has designated this as Nova Vul 2021 = V606 Vul. To quote: “R. Leadbeater, Wigton, U.K., writes that a low-resolution (R about 500) spectrogram taken on July 16.915 UT (instrumentation not specified) shows strong Balmer lines in emission showing P-Cyg profiles with an estimated velocity of about 1400 km/s, adding that there are other broad emission lines including He; the spectrogram has been posted at website URL https://britastro.org/specdb/data_graph.php?obs_id=10094.”
Interesting to read that ATEL. I’ve managed to observe it on 12 of the 14 nights since discovery and my unfiltered photometry shows it still rising as of last night.
Sort of. They still allow DATE-OBS to be anything the developer likes as long as it is indicated in a comment. That means that you have to parse comments to find out what the keyword means. That is a pretty rubbish “standard” in my view. As an engineer the FITS standard is pretty much the kind of thing that I would expect a scientist to write…
The FITS “standard” is irritatingly vague about things like this and, particularly for astrometry, it is really important to know what DATE-OBS means. In most software these days it is the time that the exposure starts but sometimes it isn’t. In “good” software there is often a comment along the lines of:
DATE-OBS= ‘2021-07-26T22:03:10’ / Start of exposure
but often there isn’t and so it is always worth checking for whatever image acquisition and processing software you use.
