Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 882 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: La Palma volcano eruption #584748
    Nick James
    Participant

    There can’t be many 0.8m telescopes on LP: https://www.astrosysteme.com/references/asa-az800-in-spain/.

    in reply to: LandSat 9 Centaur Upper Stage De-Orbit Burn #584740
    Nick James
    Participant

    I missed these predictions so didn’t get to see it but my NW sky/telescope monitoring camera did. It looks like it was a pretty amazing sight. A still from the video is here and the video is here

    in reply to: La Palma volcano eruption #584720
    Nick James
    Participant

    There is a high res map of the lava flow here. You are a little way off the top of the frame.

    in reply to: BAA AGM & Meeting. #584715
    Nick James
    Participant

    Alex. I’ll pass on your request and I’ll see if we can make it as dark as Headingly on a mid-summer’s day.

    in reply to: La Palma volcano eruption #584701
    Nick James
    Participant

    Eeek. A bit close! At least we don’t have to worry about volcanic dust clouds when observing from the UK. There is some quite spectacular footage on the Reuters site here. The pictures from El Paso and Los Llanos look very familiar. 

    in reply to: BAA AGM & Meeting. #584700
    Nick James
    Participant

    The reason for the pre-booking is that the IoP have decided to restrict the numbers in the lecture theatre to around 70 and this helps us assess how many people are likely to come. I doubt if that will be a problem for the AGM but it will be potentially more of a problem for Christmas. As with everything Covid-related things can change quickly but I hope that this meeting can go ahead since I am really looking forward to getting back to face-to-face meetings after a long break.

    In the last few months I’ve been to many crowded events and have managed to survive but I know that some people will prefer to stay away, or are just too far away for convenient travel,  so we will be livestreaming the meeting on Youtube. The IoP have been very helpful with this and it will probably become a permanent feature.

     

    in reply to: Why do we still show the images upside down? #584692
    Nick James
    Participant

    I don’t have a view on whether planetary observers should have north or south up but I do wish that they would be consistent. When I’m doing Sky Notes I either have to have some slides with the original caption text upside down or the planet just flips back and forth in an irritating way.

    Don’t get me started on the random orientations and even mirror imaged views that you see for Deep Sky objects (and also comets if truth be told).

    in reply to: Tatton Park meteorite #584663
    Nick James
    Participant

    A link to Mike’s blog in in Jeremy’s post. That contains his bio and contact details.

    in reply to: Tatton Park meteorite #584662
    Nick James
    Participant

    The summary on the National Trust collections page is “interesting”. Next time a nearby supernova goes off we clearly need to go around wearing hard hats.

    in reply to: 4P Faye dusty spectrum #584659
    Nick James
    Participant

    That’s a very impressive spectrum given that the current total magnitude of 4P is about 12. It is one of the brighter comets around at the moment and definitely worth following although it is a morning object. Current images are here

    in reply to: IX Dra: observations requested #584654
    Nick James
    Participant

    The last two nights it has been brighter than mag 15 so the outburst looks to be on schedule. Tonight (Sept 6) I have 14.7 unfiltered.

    Nick James
    Participant

    Here’s an image taken this morning (Aug 10) from Chelmsford. It is around mag 16.1 in a 9.2 arcsec aperture. My most recent previous image was July 29 when it was 17.1.

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584557
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, 2021! Corrected and Yes, the CBET is from Dan Green.

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584555
    Nick James
    Participant

    CBET 5007 has designated this as Nova Vul 2021 = V606 Vul. To quote: “R. Leadbeater, Wigton, U.K., writes that a low-resolution (R about 500) spectrogram taken on July 16.915 UT (instrumentation not specified) shows strong Balmer lines in emission showing P-Cyg profiles with an estimated velocity of about 1400 km/s, adding that there are other broad emission lines including He; the spectrogram has been posted at website URL https://britastro.org/specdb/data_graph.php?obs_id=10094.”

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584551
    Nick James
    Participant

    Interesting to read that ATEL. I’ve managed to observe it on 12 of the 14 nights since discovery and my unfiltered photometry shows it still rising as of last night.

    in reply to: Error in ASIIMG FITS header #584543
    Nick James
    Participant

    Sort of. They still allow DATE-OBS to be anything the developer likes as long as it is indicated in a comment. That means that you have to parse comments to find out what the keyword means. That is a pretty rubbish “standard” in my view. As an engineer the FITS standard is pretty much the kind of thing that I would expect a scientist to write…

    in reply to: Error in ASIIMG FITS header #584537
    Nick James
    Participant

    The FITS “standard” is irritatingly vague about things like this and, particularly for astrometry, it is really important to know what DATE-OBS means. In most software these days it is the time that the exposure starts but sometimes it isn’t. In “good” software there is often a comment along the lines of:

    DATE-OBS= ‘2021-07-26T22:03:10’ / Start of exposure

    but often there isn’t and so it is always worth checking for whatever image acquisition and processing software you use.

    in reply to: Nova Cas 2021 #584519
    Nick James
    Participant

    Stewart, Yes, it’s back up to 5.6 unfiltered tonight (July 26) which is not far short of its brightest at the previous peak. I’m doing 1s exposures and it is not far off saturating my camera. It is very hazy here but I think I’ll get the binoculars out again.

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584493
    Nick James
    Participant

    The nova is about 0.3 mag brighter tonight (July 20) than it was yesterday. My unfiltered photometry is around 0.4 mag brighter than V band since the nova is so red but the trend is pretty clear.  Of the other novae around V1405 Cas is brightening again although still around a magnitude below its brightest and V1674 Her is very gradually fading after its initial rapid decline. 

    in reply to: CG Dra: a VSS campaign #584488
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, it looks to be at the bottom of a cycle.

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 882 total)