Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 781 through 800 (of 956 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PNV J00425895+4126279 #578538
    Nick James
    Participant

    Thanks Robin. If you do get a clear slot it would be worth a try. George imaged it again last night and the object has brightened to around mag 16. Richard Miles has a spectrograph job on the 2.0-m FTN which is currently scheduled for this morning.

    in reply to: Astronomer or not? #578522
    Nick James
    Participant

    Andrew,

    They do not remain valid and they probably were not valid even when Wooley made them. I enjoy being under a dark sky and observing from dusk to dawn but where I live the sky is yellow and so I prefer to observe from indoors with a remote telescope (either my own one down the end of the garden) or one on a different continent. To claim that someone who spends a night under the stars is any more or less of an astronomer than someone who has set up and uses an automated telescope system is plainly rubbish. I would extend that to people who use remote telescopes and process and analyze their results.

    Life moves on. We all have our own preferences as to how we do our astronomy and all are equally valid. We are amateurs after all so we can decide what we want to do.

    Nick.

    in reply to: Monday 21 “Eclipse Day” #578490
    Nick James
    Participant

    James,

    Thanks. I’ve just got back to the hotel in Kearney. We had quite a long trip to Tryon this morning since the weather prediction for around here was not good. From the messages I’ve received it looks as if many BAA people saw it from various places (Idaho, Jackson and Casper and further down the track).

    Two years until the next one!

    Nick.

    in reply to: Monday 21 “Eclipse Day” #578488
    Nick James
    Participant

    And another.

    in reply to: Monday 21 “Eclipse Day” #578487
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here’s a few pics from Tryon, Nebraska.

    in reply to: Perseids #578460
    Nick James
    Participant

    Frustratingly it was mainly cloudy in Chelmsford last light but there were plenty of Perseids around in the gaps. Pictures of a couple of the bright ones are attached.

    in reply to: August 21 2017 eclipse photography. #578418
    Nick James
    Participant

    These days I prefer to operate my DSLR in HD video mode with manual exposure and the ISO fixed at 400 I then adjust the exposure during the eclipse to suit. I use a Megrez 72 and x2 Barlow operating at around f/13. I tend to take my filter off around a minute before second contact and adjust the exposure so that I get correct exposure on the inner corona which is visible even before C2. This leaves an overexposed photosphere but generally works well then for the diamond ring and prominences. You can see an example of this at around 0:25 in to this video. For Baily’s beads You would leave the filter on until C2 and use the same exposure that you use for the thin crescent.

    During totality an example exposure for prominences, inner corona and chromosphere at f/13 is around 1/1600 at ISO800 which is what I used for the attached image. This is a raw image just scaled to 50%. This would be good for the diamond ring at C2 and C3 without a filter but you would wind up the exposure to get more corona. Depending on your field of view of course since really long exposures are only worth doing if you have a shorter focal length.

    A huge advantage of digital over film is that you can see things in real time using live view so you can adjust exposures to suit the conditions. If this is your first eclipse though I would strongly suggest that you don’t spend too much time imaging but use binoculars and the naked eye to enjoy the view.

    in reply to: Comet C/2017 O1 #578373
    Nick James
    Participant
    in reply to: Enhanced vision telescopes #578355
    Nick James
    Participant

    Looks a really interesting bit of kit. A kind of hybrid of visual observing and electronic. I expect it would appeal to a lot of people.

    in reply to: Cassini Mission #578326
    Nick James
    Participant

    Wow, is it really 28 years ago! Yes, I remember the Titan/28 Sgr occultation very well, particularly the astonishing central brightening when light from the star was refracted around the limb of Titan by its atmosphere. I didn’t have any sophisticated equipment then and the attached photo was taken with a camera mounted on the back of a small refractor.

    Cassini is a mission very close to my heart. I was there for the launch and will be raising a glass when it dives into Saturn’s atmosphere on September 15.

    in reply to: C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) #578301
    Nick James
    Participant

    The orbit is still very uncertain but all the astrometry to date (a 25 day arc) implies that it is near parabolic with a perihelion at 1.8au at the end of 2022 or early 2023. This is much less interesting than if it had been in a shorter period orbit since it probably means the that the comet is dynamically new. Such comets tend to have significant activity far from the Sun but then the underperform as they move into the inner Solar System. Still, it is worth observing this comet if you have the equipment. It is very well placed and you don’t often get the chance to image comets which are 16au away.

    in reply to: Satellite Pairings / Triplets in Low Earth Orbit #578279
    Nick James
    Participant

    That Youtube video is fantastic, particularly the thruster plume. Unfortunately I was distracted by other things on Saturday night so forgot all about it. I clearly missed a very nice display.

    in reply to: Satellite Pairings / Triplets in Low Earth Orbit #578263
    Nick James
    Participant

    The CRS-11 launch has been scrubbed due to bad weather at the Cape. Next opportunity is Saturday.

    in reply to: Meeting videos from the May 31 meeting #578262
    Nick James
    Participant

    All three talks are now available to members via the meeting page here.

    in reply to: C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) #578256
    Nick James
    Participant

    After yesterday’s meeting at Burlington House Peter Carson has obtained some more astrometry of this object. I’ve added that to the collection and the output from findorb is attached. As I said at the meeting yesterday the period and perihelion date are very poorly constrained at the moment and the residuals aren’t much different if you force the orbit to be parabolic. Astrometry over the next couple of weeks should start to resolve that so we should at least have a good idea of the orbit. It will be a few years before we can even guess how bright it is likely to be when it comes to perihelion in 2023.

    in reply to: Supernova 2017ein discovered by Ron Arbour #578236
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, many congratulations to Ron. Here’s an image of the new SN taken a couple of minutes ago.

    in reply to: Full Moon 10th May 2017 #578209
    Nick James
    Participant

    Great pic.

    in reply to: Dr Bill Ward #578188
    Nick James
    Participant

    Indeed. Excellent achievement. It would be good to see the thesis online.

    in reply to: Videos from the March 29 meeting now online #578151
    Nick James
    Participant

    Michael. We use a sony voice recorder and a video recorder that goes in the HDMI/VGA path between the laptop and projector. I can’t remember the model number of this but it wasn’t too expensive. Jeremy or Dominic will know the details if you need them. We then merge the audio and video together to produce the final recording.

    in reply to: Winchester Weekend 2017 #578108
    Nick James
    Participant

    It was a fantastic weekend with brilliant weather, excellent talks and great company.

    Those at Winchester will know that I had set myself the challenge of imaging all four of the relatively bright comets around at the moment even though the pesky Moon was almost full. 41P and 2015V2 are the subject of our current Observing Challenge and they were relatively easy since they were near the zenith, 2017 E4 was a bit more difficult since it was only around 15 deg up at dawn and 2015 ER61 was the hardest of the bunch since it was only 5 deg up when the sky was getting very bright. I used a Megrez 72 refractor at f/4.8 with a Canon EOS600D on a Vixen Sphynx mount set up on the lower football field. I’m pleased to say that after an alarm clock malfunction on the Saturday I managed to get them all on the Sunday. The attached montage shows them all at the same scale. A full-res version of this picture is available via the link.

Viewing 20 posts - 781 through 800 (of 956 total)