Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
There is an interesting paper on ArXiv today that looks at the effect of geomagnetic activity in the re-entry of Starlink satellites, especially during the rising phase of Cycle 25: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13752
An MNRAS preprint on ArXiv today considers “Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of the Recurrent Nova M31N 2008-12a” during the 2024 eruption discussed in the thread: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10431
More on the Nova Super Remnant (NSR) around RS Oph. This time deep narrowband Condor Array Telescope imagery which have revealed a ∼1.5 degree, ∼ 70 pc-sized NSR in this ApJ preprint on ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09510
There is an intriguing paper relating to this eclipse that has recently been published and cited on spaceweather.com. Giovanni di Giovanni might be especially interested as it refers to the electrical response of spruce trees in the Dolomites to this eclipse: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241786
“As the eclipse approached, electrical signals from different trees began to align; their waveforms became more similar in shape and timing. This synchronization peaked during the eclipse and gradually diminished afterward. Older trees started showing electrical changes earlier, in some cases hours before the eclipse began, while younger trees responded later and more weakly.
The researchers interpreted this as a coordinated response to a large-scale environmental event, possibly involving communication or shared signaling pathways. ”
A paper on ArXiv today discusses “Initial Observations of the First BlueBird Spacecraft and a Model of Their Brightness”, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05820
“Based on a large set of visual observations, the mean apparent magnitude of BlueBird satellites is 3.44, while the mean of magnitudes adjusted to a uniform distance of 1000 km is 3.84. Near zenith the spacecraft can be as bright as magnitude 0.5. While these spacecraft are bright enough to impact astronomical observations, they can for periods be fainter than the BlueWalker 3 prototype satellite. A model for their brightness shows that design changes since the BlueWalker 3 mission can explain the behavior of BlueBird.”
I hoped they may stick their necks on in the section 4.3 “when will T CrB erupt?”. They observe that “Recent photometric and spectroscopic observations indicate that the system is returning to a high-accretion state. Given this, an eruption may be imminent, even without distinct precursors”. So, as ever, we shall just have to keep on watching as there might be no warning.
An MNRAS preprint on ArXiv today reviews images of the VN since 2017: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01760
The paper “Hubble’s Variable Nebula I: Ripples on a Big Screen” describes how they compiled images into a movie which can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QOkzmlSzKI
The RAS has launched a video on observing the Lyrids.
There is something of a gap in coverage at Pacific longitudes. Partly due to sparsely populated regions and partly due to people submitting their observations to other organisations (e.g. Japan). The Philippines seems to be a fruitful area for increasing coverage.
Keep up the good work with your imaging patrol.
A preprint on ArXiv today on the “Red giant component of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis” concludes the mag of the red giant is V = 10.17 +/- 0.06
I see at least Space.com put a question mark at the end of their headline and quoted Jeremy’s scepticism (Also the lack of any evidence in the RV data to support the presence of a suggested third body to trigger the outburst on certain dates.)
https://www.space.com/the-universe/stars/hold-onto-your-hats-is-the-blaze-star-t-corona-borealis-about-to-go-boomIt’s nice to see some balanced reporting. And to be quoted correctly 🙂
Not so sure about the third body, though!
Yes it’s a strange claim, Michael. And made with such certainty. Perhaps an example of false precision…
Mind you, if it does hold off until just after midnight tonight, it will be a nice birthday present for me 🙂….and now the BBC has picked it up: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cjw2j8e1476o
Pretty impressive sight. I was emerging from my observatory, which has its door on the N side, at saw it as I looked up.
iPhone pic here: https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20250324_214542_63483fe3de3e8a2eI also caught it on my N facing meteor camera.
Yes this prediction in the Schneider paper was discussed a few posts above (3 March), Dave.
As I said then, I can see no real astrophysical basis for this.The rest of the article is not bad at all. Thanks for sharing it.
The link to Forbes does not work for me. I found it here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2025/03/20/a-star-may-explode-next-week-in-once-in-80-years-event—what-to-know/
Edit: this link does not work either. The real link, bizarrely and unhelpfully, contains three hyphens in a row which seem to get corrupted into a single long line.
Those of you planning to attend this meeting in God’s Own County, and with time available, might like to see this article on local astronomy haunts: https://britastro.org/journal_contents_ite/an-astronomical-day-out-in-rural-cheshire
Great to hear this development, Andy. I especially look forward to seeing what sort of photometry you can extract.
I would also be interested to hear how faint you can go with different exposures and therefore whether this Smart Scope, or others, might have value in nova searches (where detections by a amateurs using 135mm lenses and digital cameras have been successful).
I’ve started work on the “real time photometric alert script”, I hope I can outrun T CrB … My plan is to have this run on a Raspberry Pi, using siril-cli (for stacking (say) 4 x 10 sec exposures (green channel), Source-extractor (for creating a catalog of detected stars and instrumental photometry), scamp for doing the astrometric solution and some custom scripts to check the photometric results for consistency and generate the actual trigger. We will see…
This is an interesting project, Heinz-Bernd. Keep us posted and if it works out perhaps you can write it up for the VSS Circular.
Good luck!Yes I am familiar with that analysis Steve. I can’t think of an astrophysical reason why there should be a fixed number of orbits between eruptions.
A paper on the “Binary Parameters for the Recurrent Nova T Coronae Borealis” today reports the masses of the white dwarf and the red giant that comprise this binary system. The authors conclude that the WD mass is 1.37 +/- 0.01 M-sun. This would place it close to the Chandrasekhar instability limit.
