Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jeremy ShearsParticipantGreat stuff, Steve.
There are people doing daytime imaging of the field of T CrB. Though I am not aware of anyone using a Seestar for that, ARne Henden is using a Newtonian stopped down to 50mm, a long focal length Seestar 50 🙂
Here is a discussion on daytime imaging: https://britastro.org/forums/topic/24-hour-monitoring-of-t-crb
Jeremy ShearsParticipantHello Steve,
Looking at both the BAA VSS and AAVSO data it has been brightenin g over the last 25-ish days, but it looks like part of the normal 226 day period modulation.
VSS LC from 1 Jan 26 attached.
Keep looking though – you are doing great work. I have lost it from my site.
Go well!
Jeremy-
This reply was modified 3 days, 1 hour ago by
Jeremy Shears.
Attachments:
Jeremy ShearsParticipantApparently it has levelled off at mage 1.0 according to this ATel: https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=18114
Jeremy ShearsParticipantChristopher,
more and more people are using Seestars and other smart scopes for photometry effectively (e.g. David Conner has written about it in recent VSS Circulars). This is a good thing. However, as Andy pointed out, we do need to ensure the photometry is reliable. We know from Steve Knight’s extensive work on T CrB that at some point dodgy photometry was produced when software was updated – he spent a LOT of time digging into the reasons.
It also depends on what the photometry is subsequently used for. “Quick and dirty measurements” might have their place in some projects, for example detecting a nova eruption, but problems start when unreliable data are uploaded into databases from which the data are subsequently extracted for analysis. We need to ensure that the databases containing amateur photometry, like the VSS database, retain their high reputation in the astrophysics community, including by professional astronomers.
Go well!
Jeremy-
This reply was modified 1 week ago by
Jeremy Shears.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantI am actually OK with the term amateur astronomer and that is how I describe myself. “An amateur is a person who engages in an activity, sport, or art for pleasure, passion, or personal interest rather than for financial gain or as a profession” sums it up for me.
But whilst we are on the subject of terminology, one term I dislike is “citizen science”.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantATel 18097 today has an intriguing title: Extreme Velocity Gradients in the Atmosphere of Betelgeuse: Is Another Dimming Event Imminent?
Jeremy ShearsParticipantIt’s back and running today, David.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantIt seems to be down, David. Maybe because it’s hosted in Russia?
I usually access via VSX, but that link is dead too.
VizieR has GCVS 5.1 data which are accessible.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantATel 18090 today:
V488 Sge transitions to the nebular phase: the significant [O III] emission
https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=18090
Jeremy ShearsParticipantI’ve always been slightly irritated by calling T CrB “The Blaze Star” and had assumed it was a comparitively recent Americanism. Apologies to all Americans for my prejudice. It turns out I was wrong, it was first used in the Sept 15th 1869 edition of English Mechanic & Mirror of Science. I will now be using the term at every opportunity!
Many older atlases have it identified as Blaze Star.
But not to be confused with Blaze Starr: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaze_Starr
Jeremy ShearsParticipantPossible beryllium emission detected in UV: https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=18073
Jeremy ShearsParticipantInteresting ATel update on spectroscopy by Teyssier et al, including Robin Leadbeater and Hugh Allen
https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=18053
Jeremy ShearsParticipantThree of the authors have another paper on superoutbursts of YZ Cnc based on TESS photometry and long-baseline ground-based observations.
The ApJ accepted manuscript is available here.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantMultiple Seestar T CrB light curve beginning July 4th 2024. This curve is derived from 397,667 (ish) exposures up to September 9th 2026. There are 264 data points here each derived from a stack of as much of the night as I can manage. Processed with Pixinsight and differential photometry with AstroImageJ. Exposures are 2-30 sec. Now investigating how my green channel magnitude matches V magnitude.
Good to see you persevering with this, Steve. Keep going!
Jeremy ShearsParticipantI changed the title of this thread not Jodrell Bank NOT closed following the PM’s statement.
However, news emerged from the government yesterday that throws this into doubt. The article “Jodrell Bank’s e-Merlin network still faces closure in 2028” suggests that the govt still upholds the STFC funding reductions.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantIn an ApJ paper on ArXiv, Brad Schaefer analyses available data on V1405 Cas and concludes, among other things, V1405 Cas is not a Type Ia supernova progenitor.
V1405 is still mag ~13 and above quiescence.
Jeremy ShearsParticipantThis MNRAS submission on The First Multi-Messenger Nova: External Shocks, TeV Photons, and Neutrinos in the Next Eruption of T CrB takes another look at timescales for its eruption recurrence.
Taking various factors into consideration, the authors come up with a recurrence time-scale of Trec ≃ 80±12 yr.
However, they note that if substantial weight is instead assigned to the proposed historical eruptions of T CrB, and the 1217–1787 interval between eruptions is assumed to contain seven recurrence cycles, the resulting recurrence history implies a much narrower characteristic time-scale of ≃ 79–80 yr with a dispersion of only ∼ 1–2 yr. The latter is in line with Schaefer’s predictions.
We are now at T(last eruption) + 0.6 years and we keep looking…..
Jeremy ShearsParticipantOver the last couple of days on logging in I get the following message:
Forbidden (403)
CSRF verification failed. Request abortedI am nevertheless logged in when I then navigate to the homepage
4 September 2026 at 7:41 pm in reply to: Variable Star Section Circular for September 2026 (number 209) #642783
Jeremy ShearsParticipantJust to round this off, here is the processed version of Mike’s early spectrum image taken on 2026-08-25 compared with mine for the same night. They are qualitatively similar with the P Cygni profiles in H alpha, Beta visible at this stage can be seen in both spectra along with various other lines including FeII. The objective prism resolution approaches that of the ALPY at the blue end but is significantly lower above 5500A where the non linear dispersion compresses the scale in the prism spectrum. (Note the Y scale, these features are quite weak)
Cheers
RobinThanks Robin. Interesting to see.
4 September 2026 at 6:21 am in reply to: Variable Star Section Circular for September 2026 (number 209) #642773
Jeremy ShearsParticipantHi Jeremy,
There is indeed an early Star Analyser spectrum of this Nova posted on “Cloudy Nights” in which the P Cygni profile at H alpha is resolved
Note sure if it can be picked up in Mike’s early spectrum but I will take a look (The resolution in prism spectra is highest at the blue end where the dispersion is greatest)
Cheers
RobinThanks Robin. Good to see.
-
This reply was modified 3 days, 1 hour ago by
-
AuthorPosts


