Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Only 10 Lyrids on my NW facing camera last night 21/22nd, though cloud was patchy and completely clouded over by 02:00 UT so probably missed the peak
I just thought it was suspicious to get 3 meteors so close together and parallel within a 30 second period.
Specular reflectance flares from satellite constellations perhaps ?
Cheers
RobinIf it is gas from an eruption it will be interesting to see if it turns into a dark (absorption) feature in UV images once it reaches the sunlit area
Robin
European institutions including British will need to step up to fill some of these gaps.
There are other important resources like this in Europe like CDS (SIMBAD etc) for example, and others which form a global “astro-ecosystem”. This is less to do with money and more to do with politics and cultural shifts in the US though of course.
The controlled constant temperature that cooling provides also means that calibration frames can be re-used
Robin
Interesting graphics from NASA in this article. The accretion disc appears to be around the wrong star, with the erupting T CrB occuring in the outer regions of the disc. Wow!
I did a reverse image search and tracked it back to where it was repurposed from in 2010
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/20184
not that it makes it any better but at least we now know who was to blame !They actually do also have a decent animation linked from that page showing the accreting system but not the outburst
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/20393/EDIT the explosion is shown in a further animations down the page
I see at least Space.com put a question mark at the end of their headline and quoted Jeremy’s scepticism (Also the lack of any evidence in the RV data to support the presence of a suggested third body to trigger the outburst on certain dates.)
https://www.space.com/the-universe/stars/hold-onto-your-hats-is-the-blaze-star-t-corona-borealis-about-to-go-boomThe downside for spectroscopy though would be the built in 430-690nm “astro” filter. Does it also have an unfiltered setting do you know ? (If not, for dedicated astro use an obvious hack would be to remove the terrestrial “VIS” filter like with DSLR)
The dual band OIII/Hbeta +H alpha filter setting could be interesting for wavelength calibration thoughCheers
RobinHi Andy,
It is perhaps also interesting for spectroscopy. I see from the specs that the sensor is larger than the one in the SeeStar 30 which means that unlike the Seestars it could potentially be used directly with a Star Analyser recording the full spectrum in one shot (not including the zero order, though that plus the blue end of the spectrum could be captures separately.) The equatorial mode would also avoid the problem of the spectrum fanning out due to field rotation which is seen with the SeeStar. The tiny 2 micron pixels means the image is probably well over sampled which should be good for avoiding artifacts with the colour sensor.
Cheers
RobinThe specs on line say it has an (impressively large) 9.6v 45Ah internal battery, good for 10 hours operation
I suspect 45Ah may be a typo and the battery is actually 4.5Ah even though the 45Ah figure appears everywhere on different sites.
Compare for example with the effectively identical Celestron branded version, here where a space has been used instead of the decimal point (9 5v 4 5Ah)
https://altairastro.com/celestron-nexstar-evolution-925×22-sct-6537-p.asp
That would be ok for the claimed 10 hrs just tracking (at ~0.5A) but a lot of slewing would take more power. What life do you typically get with the internal battery ? (If the internal battery is 4.5Ah then say 3 x that time with the 17Ahr power tank would seem reasonable given that you don’t want to run down lead acid batteries too low to prolong their life)Cheers
RobinThe specs on line say it has an (impressively large) 9.6v 45Ah internal battery, good for 10 hours operation eg
https://www.firstlightoptics.com/alt-azimuth-astronomy-mounts/sky-watcher-fusion-120i-synscan-mount-and-tripod.html
so if that is correct, a 17Ah external power pack is not going to increase the run time dramatically. How long do you want to run for?Cheers
RobinI did a thing for the BBC news 6 & 10pm yesterday where they wanted a live image of a planet
Yes ! Heard your name , looked up from the observatory computer screen and saw a live image Of Jupiter on the 10 o’clock news. Was that a live feed? That has to be some kind of first hasn’t it ?
Ken,
Dark, bias flat and sky background subtraction (based on an interpolation using regions above and below the spectrum) is normally all handled by the spectrum reduction program
Cheers
RobinNot sure where the discrepancy arises but the minimum will be somewhat resolution dependent if the line is not fully resolved.
OK so the difference between my measurement and the BASS2000 spectrum is not just due to a difference in resolution. See attached comparison where the BASS2000 spectrum has been spline filtered to ~ match the resolution in my spectrum. The discrepancy is still there and looks to be due to a zero offset so I need to check back on how I did the background subtraction.
Attachments:
The very high resolution BASS2000 solar spectrum however has a minimum of ~0.15 at H beta
https://bass2000.obspm.fr/solar_spect.php
Not sure where the discrepancy arises but the minimum will be somewhat resolution dependent if the line is not fully resolved. EW would be a better measure of intensityCheers
Robinthere is a discrepency at Hbeta (min intensity ~ 0.2 compared to my value of ~ 0.35) which I would like to resolve.
Ken,
My measurement originally posted by Andy confirms your value of ~0.35 minimum for H beta as measured at R~18000
https://britastro.org/specdb/data_graph.php?obs_id=9871Cheers
Robinas well as downscaling, converting to video also involves significant compression with resulting artifacts and loss of detail, akin to using jpeg images
The amount of compression (in addition to the downscaling (binning by interpolation) can be seen by comparing the video size with the expected size of uncompressed frames. For example one minute of uncompressed 8 bit 1270×720 video at 60fps should be 1270*720*60*60 = ~3.3GB !
Cheers
RobinI forgot to mention that as well as downscaling, converting to video also involves significant compression with resulting artifacts and loss of detail, akin to using jpeg images so the resulting video is not like uncompressed avi from webcams (or ser from astro cameras) so RAW stills would be better. The downside is planetary imagers take hundreds or even thousands of frames to select the ones with good seeing to stack which would be impractical with RAW frames from a DSLR
Cheers
RobinSadly eclipse day was cloudy, but Gigglewick got it!
As a girl of 7, my mother lived in rural Lancashire a few miles along the track from Giggleswick and recalled the 1927 eclipse. She remembered the chickens rushing back into the hen house thinking night had fallen !
