Dawson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 152 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aberrations in astronomy #584018
    Dawson
    Participant

    Alan,

    I got a copy of this book maybe a year or two ago as part of a job lot of books. I flicked through it at the time and saw some equations and complicated graphs and decided it was too advanced for me, so I stuck it on a shelf… I’ve now looked in it in more detail on your advice and it is a remarkably accessible book. Yes there are equations and in places, it goes off on another level, but there is a good proportion of the book which is very helpful and informative. Thank you for making me get it off the shelf.

    James

    in reply to: Aberrations in astronomy #584014
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks all for the replies. Some very useful additions to my list.

    I’m planning to keep it simple (like me) and concentrate on the errors and aberrations which are common and [relatively] easy to resolve. I’ll get someone to talk about star testing to make people aware of the more advanced methods of testing optics available.

    Thanks.

    James

    in reply to: 2021 Quiz #583738
    Dawson
    Participant

    Here are the answers to the quiz:

    https://hidrive.ionos.com/lnk/VZUDuoge

    We discussed the answers and the other options in our online meeting on Thursday which can be watched on YouTube:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ck0jXq_uuk&t=3178s

    We’ve since learnt at least one of the questions has an error; there is a Mare Australe on Mars as well as on the Moon. The number of principal stars in the asterism of Cepheus is also being debated… 48 unambiguous questions out of 50 isn’t bad I don’t think!

    James

    in reply to: Dismantling EQ6 #583698
    Dawson
    Participant

    Are you sure you are turning it the correct way?

    in reply to: Dismantling EQ6 #583693
    Dawson
    Participant

    Can you post a picture of the bit which is stuck?

    Have you used this site to help you:

    http://www.astro-baby.com/EQ6%20rebuild%20guide/EQ6%20RA%20strip%20down.htm

    James

    in reply to: Streaming Mars for National Astronomy Week #582972
    Dawson
    Participant

    David, we can probably help out. We’d need to test the data transfer rate from our observatory over 4G else could set up a 14” or 11” SCT from someone‘s garden. 
    James

    Dawson
    Participant

    This is going to be a tricky one. We’d planned to try and observe the occultations of Venus, but I was undecided what filters to use, and I need to make a longer sun-shield.

    James

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582535
    Dawson
    Participant

    Taken at 01:34 UT 30.05.2020 with Canon 6D at prime focus on Celestron C11 (15 second exposure, ISO 800); excuse the hot pixels; a cropped version with brightness stretched to show it easier. Have the raw files.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582516
    Dawson
    Participant

    Gary / Jeremy, I’ve never made a meaningful observation of anything the VSS is interested in. What sort of settings would you recommend For a DSLR at prime focus? I think the FoV will be too wide with my 80mm refractor  so May have to jump right up and use my C11 and Canon 6D. I think I can get to a site with a low northerly horizon that isn’t too light polluted; but 3am though, whose idea was that?!?!?! 🙂

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582512
    Dawson
    Participant

    How long will is likely remain mag 10 for? 

    James

    in reply to: Imaging Venus #582269
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks for all the comments and links. It is fascinating. I’m not intending to image or observe near the Sun,  I was just interested to see what sort of results the serious amateur can achieve so close to the Sun. Some of the images in the article Alex links to look far too close for comfort! 

    Thanks.

    James

    in reply to: Imaging Venus #582265
    Dawson
    Participant

    Chris, that is really impressive, thank you. Looking at those dates/times on Stellarium, it is really impressive at how close to the Sun 6 degrees is. Do you take any measures to extend a dew shield of the like to reduce the glare of the Sun into the optics?

    James

    in reply to: MarsJupiterSaturn together #582198
    Dawson
    Participant

    Nice capture

    in reply to: Luna Cognita – A nice surprise #582136
    Dawson
    Participant

    It is an amazing three volume set.

    James

    in reply to: Huge atmospheric experiment starting #582135
    Dawson
    Participant

    Yes, with fewer aircraft and fewer cars around, the sky conditions may improve.

    With regards air “quality”, I’ve been watching the UK Air Information Resource and not seen any particular downward trends yet. The data below is for the last 7 days for Canterbury, but back data for several years from numerous sites around the country exist:

    https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/data-plot?site_id=CANT&days=7

    James

    in reply to: Royal Mail stamps issued for the RAS bicentennial #582059
    Dawson
    Participant

    There are typos in the booklet too unfortunately:

    https://shop.royalmail.com/visions-of-the-universe-prestige-stamp-book

    in reply to: Star map/atlas #581688
    Dawson
    Participant

    There are a few, some:

    The Cambridge Star Atlas (2011), copies available for under £10. 

    Uranometria 2000 volume 1 (1987), copies available for £25.

    Sky Atlas 2000.0 (1985), cheapest seems to be about £40 but it is lovely.

    Star Atlas of Reference Stars and Non-stellar Objects (1969), copies £50.

    Interstellarum Deep Sky Atlas: Desk Edition (2014), copies £65 or so.

    Millennium Star Atlas 3 Volume Boxed Set (2006), £600 or so…

    The first two are fine; you can probably find a way to look at them all inside online somewhere. I really do like Stellarium though which is usually my first port of call, with all the added star databases loaded in.

     

    in reply to: Smartphone adapter recommendations? #581483
    Dawson
    Participant

    It really is very good. Clamps the eye piece well, and really is easy to adjust and centre an object. Really good for outreach stuff.

    in reply to: Definitions… #581478
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks all. Interesting discussion. This has helped.

    James

    in reply to: Real-time photometry software #581425
    Dawson
    Participant

    A noisy child’s orrery I have (currently very noisy as running at 12v and not 4.5v) and the light grabber software work well. I need an external webcam ideally and not use the built in one on the laptop.

    thanks for the discussion.

    james

    Link to a video of the set up on my dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/inv87rgfm4ht08u/IMG_1529.MOV?dl=0

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 152 total)