Dawson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 19 posts - 161 through 179 (of 179 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 10″ Newtonian looking for new home – free #577485
    Dawson
    Participant

    This has now found a new home.

    James

    in reply to: I have a new job #577442
    Dawson
    Participant

    Congratulations. Do we get mates rates?

    ๐Ÿ™‚

    James

    in reply to: TRANSIT OF MERCURY #577384
    Dawson
    Participant

    David,

    As someone who is next to useless with Photoshop (I do all my image adjustments in Microsoft Paint (!), Faststone or Microsoft Powerpoint), I found your instructions most helpful, thank you. It still took me about an hour to get to grips with layers, but once I got the hang of it I was well away. Many thanks for this guide.

    James

    in reply to: Transit of Mercury #577383
    Dawson
    Participant

    Finally managed to find the time (many hours) to get my head around PhotoShop (with help from David Basey) to make a composite image of my images showing the transit from Monday, as view from Nottingham. It was blowing a gale here and there was intermittant heavy cloud, but I was taking an image every 20 seconds during the transit so have managed to find a reasonable image about every 15 minutes which I’ve superimposed onto the first image where Mercury just starts to take a bite out of the Sun. I’ve had to crop the planet everso slightly as the background intensity of the Sun differed grealy between the images, so the planet too perfectly round I’m afaraid, but its position is as close I could get it using the whole face of the Sun to position each one; I suspect the slight wobble on the planets track is due to movement in my set up and camera in the gale, but I felt this was more realistic than making a false straight line which my data doesn’t support. I’ve nearly given up with the time lapse video as the cloud after the first five hours just makes stacking the frames nearly impossible, but if I can face wasting another 6 hours on it I will try again.

    James

    in reply to: Transit of Mercury #577357
    Dawson
    Participant

    I’m working on a time lapse, but cloud and wind are working against me ๐Ÿ™‚ Here is a link to a very rough and ready and low res time lapse of the first three hours of the transit:

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1673286/Mercury%20transit%20the%20first%20three%20hours.avi

    Skywatcher ED80, Baader solar film, Tal 2x Barlow, Canon 6D; one shot every 60 seconds for the first three hours, stacked into an AVI (on a loop) in PIPP.

    James

    P.S. I should add there are numerous dust bunnies which also look like they are trying to transit the sun ๐Ÿ™‚ I’m not sure yet how to process these out as I can’t think how to take flats with solar film!

    in reply to: Welsh star trail #577319
    Dawson
    Participant

    Try again:

    in reply to: Nominations for Council #577298
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks Callum. Food for thought.

    James

    in reply to: Infrared; friend or foe? #577297
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thank you all.

    I was attempting to image Jupiter the other night with my new camera and whilst the seeing was excellent, the results I got the next day were awful. I’ve just realised the window in the camera is just glasss and not an IR blocking filter. Doh!

    James

    in reply to: Infrared; friend or foe? #577277
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks Bill. 

    I think my question 1 was poorly phrased; it probably should have read: “with a colour sensor, is it desirable to block IR when imaging the moon and planets? If so, why?”

    What about UV? I presume UV is blocked by clear glass.

    James

    in reply to: 2013 TX68 #577270
    Dawson
    Participant

    It apparently passed us by at about 10x the distance of the Moon:

    http://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-2013-tx68-uncertain-trajectory-closest-earth-mar-5-2016

    Phew ๐Ÿ™‚

    Jame

    in reply to: 2013 TX68 #577267
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks Martin. I’ll take my hard hat off then; that’s a relief ๐Ÿ™‚

    James

    in reply to: Donati’s / Great Comet of 1858 #577220
    Dawson
    Participant

    A copy of this book arrived this morning, and while I probably won’t read it from cover to cover, I’m looking forward to flicking through it at some stage and reading little bits and looking at the lovely pictures:

    Fire in the Sky: Comets and Meteors, the Decisive Centuries, in British Art and Science Hardcover โ€“ 26 Feb 1998

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fire-Sky-Meteors-Decisive-Centuries-British/dp/0521630606/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1452170446&sr=8-1&keywords=comet+fire+sky

    James

    in reply to: Donati’s / Great Comet of 1858 #577195
    Dawson
    Participant

    Wow, that is a lovely painting.

    James

    in reply to: DSLR widefield Milky Way #577106
    Dawson
    Participant

    Yes, there is now a full frame version. It doesn’t fit into the body of the camera in a stunningly conventional way, but it does the trick. One has to flip the mirror up, and drop the oblong filter in the hole. It seems a bit Heath Robinson, but is easy to put in and relatively easy to take out.

    james

    in reply to: Star trail #577104
    Dawson
    Participant

    On one of the subs there was a bright meteor. After checking the time on the DSLR (and correcting as the camera was two minutes fast and on British Summer Time), I submitted the sub to the NEMETODE network to see if anyone captured the event. Sure enough at least two have captured the meteor on video, and initial analysis shows it was a meteor over Galloway, and had a bright terminal flash. It’s good to combine the widefield observation with video meteor detection. 

    James

    in reply to: Eclipse #577081
    Dawson
    Participant

    A lovely capture. Well done.

    I found it was quite hard to get the settings correct on the camera as either the remaining illuminated arc was too bright, or the rest of the Moon was too dark – you seem to have got a good balance. Nice work. It was well worth staying up late for.

    At 5am though I was surrounded by mist and fog and it was like a scene from the Hound of the Baskervilles, and I was worried the beast might smell my remaining mini pork pie ๐Ÿ™‚

    James

    in reply to: Lunar eclipse from Nottingham #577080
    Dawson
    Participant

    Clearly the images didn’t attach, so I’ll try again>

    James

    in reply to: Goodacres #576925
    Dawson
    Participant

    Bill,

    Thanks for this. I’m already making contacts on the family history websites and doing some digging.

    I went to look at Robert’s grave on Tuesday, but the writing at the bottom remains elusive to me, even after trying a wax crayon rubbing. I’m waiting on the cemetery people to get back to me to say if they have a written archive of what was originally engraved on the head stone.

    I think I have found Walter and his father on the mid 1800s censuses, and it looks like I’ve also found Walter’s paternal grandfather, John, on the 1841 census. I am still trying to work out what link, if any, exists between Walter and Robert.

    Professor Ian Inkster who wrote this article about Robert in 1980 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1980JBAA…90..245I) is coming to Nottingham in October, so I am hoping to catch up with him then for a coffee and a chat – even if I don’t learn any more about either Goodacre, it will be a great opportunity to just chat with a fascinating academic.

     

    in reply to: BAA Directory #576870
    Dawson
    Participant

    Thanks. Yes, I guess that is the reason – I just wondered if there were BAA members in my locality as trying to promote my astronomical society.

    Regards

    James

Viewing 19 posts - 161 through 179 (of 179 total)