John Rogers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Origin of Jupiter’s GRS #623532
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Yes, their historical account is essentially the same as in my 1995 book, which fortunately they do cite thoroughly — and brought up to date, of course. The idea that the GRS formed from a South Tropical Disturbance was also proposed in my book. What’s new, and very welcome, is that they have done computational simulations that show this to be physically plausible.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616913
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Grant Privett & Nick Quinn, well done in capturing JUICE, so far out on its journey!

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616859
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Fantastic to know that JUICE is on its way safely, even though it will require four flybys of Earth or Venus before it really heads for Jupiter!

    in reply to: Jupiter’s closest opposition since 1963 #613487
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Thanks for researching and posting this analysis. So from your charts (and exact dates that you have sent me), it appears that the recent opposition was the closest for 70 years due to a combination of the 60-year cycle in perihelion distance, and an ~86-year cycle in the time of Jupiter’s apparition in which perihelion occurs. The smallest perihelion distance in the present 60-year cycle was actually in 2010, but this occurred far from opposition (and similarly in 2070). In 2022/23, perihelion distance is about average, but it occurs closer to opposition than average. In 2129, a close perihelion will occur close to opposition, so the distance from Earth will be even less.

    in reply to: Where do the observations go? #579182
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Hi Dave,  I replied to your post yesterday but my comment has not appeared.  So, to summarise briefly, the Jupiter Section uses amateur images intensively for the reports which I post on our Section web pages, and for pro-am collaborations.  Plenty of info is on our Section web pages and in our annual reports in the October issues of the Journal.  We don’t make a public global database of Jupiter images because there are other sites that do that already.

    in reply to: Minimum aperture for seeing GRS? #578985
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Thanks David.

    in reply to: Clustered flaring satellites (not Iridium) #578321
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Thanks, William and John, for these very informative replies. 

    in reply to: Clustered flaring satellites (not Iridium) #578317
    John Rogers
    Participant

    Hi William,

    Many thanks — I’m impressed that you were able to identify them and that they were different, military satellites.

    Do you know if it is possible to predict these flares from them?

    Cheers, John.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)