Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Bill,
It will be quite a bit of work to replicate Steve’s meteor analysis techniques from 20 years ago, but you should have a lot of fun in the process.
I’m considering changing my Leeds_N lens from a 12mm to an 8mm, to increase my coverage of the Borders and southern Scotland. This will increase our chances of recording more dual- and multi-station events.
Heavy snow put paid to my attendance at the ASE meeting in March so it’s been rearranged for October 5th. I’ll be in Edinburgh for a couple of days. I’ll keep you updated.
Cheers,
Alex.
Hi Bill,
The longest focal length lenses in the NEMETODE network (12mm) can achieve reference star O-Cs of 0.5 arcmin, very similar to the CAMS and SonotaCo networks. HD video systems should surpass this, but they need beefy PCs to cope with the data bandwidth and data processing requirements.
Both SD and HD video systems have their uses in estimating meteor rates, radiants and solar system orbits. Let’s see what your DSLRs can do this summer.
Cheers,
Alex.
Hi Bill,
Have a look at this JBAA paper by Steve Evans -1998 Aug Vol 108 No 4 pp. 204-206
and other references to stepper motor rotating shutter systems
1999 Dec Vol 109 No 6 p.3002001 Feb Vol 111 No 1 p.332001 Dec Vol 111 No 6 pp.337-3382002 Apr Vol 112 No 2 p.63 & p.94Cheers,Alex.Hi Bill,
Great to meet up at Stirling!
As discussed offline, I’m really pleased that you’ve got Steve Evans’ rotating shutter system up and running for long-duration operation. All members who knew Steve will be delighted to see any results you obtain with this kit.
Perhaps we can locate a paper or report by him documenting its chop rate etc., although I fully agree with the need to check and confirm its current performance.
Have fun!
Alex.
Hi Bill,
I have one of the late Steve Evans’ stepper motor-driven rotating shutters from AWR Technology. He used this system with Canon T70 cameras – and in conjunction with video timings from Andrew Elliott and Tim Haymes et al – determined the solar system orbits of Geminids and other major showers. It’s much easier these days using video cameras and the latest software!
I’ve just tested the control box, stepper motor and cutaway shutter and it burst into life. The AWR Technology website describes this equipment, which might differ slightly from the items in my care.
You are welcome to have them for your ‘olde fashioned’ meteor work. I can bring the items to Stirling this weekend.
Cheers,
Alex.
To add to the fun I once saw a ‘correction’ made by an editor (non-BAA) who changed all references to Angstrom to Armstrong. 🙂
Clear skies,
Alex.
Hi Bill,
I must add this to my library. Any chance of it being available from the BAA Shop?
Clear skies,
Alex.
David,
thanks for posting about this brief opportunity to see this NEO from the UK.
I find it frustrating and amusing in equal measure that the MPC’s ‘Daily Minor Planet’ often tells us about NEO flybys the day after they’ve been and gone. 🙂
I had to smile this teatime as I checked my e-mails and ESA’s 2010 WC9 Close-Approach Fact Sheet arrived in my Inbox at 16:09. Informative but no use for planning a UK observing session.
Thankfully other resources such as the Minor Planet Mailing List and some astro magazines tell us in advance. I recorded 2010 WC9 last night and will add something to my Member Page this evening.
Clear skies,
Alex.
Hi,
It looks like my NW camera recorded the same event, although the meteor was near the edge of my FoV, so unfortunately I only recorded one of the trails.
Cheers,
Alex.
We’re all likely to produce unintentional typos after a long observing session!
I used my Watec video camera and 50mm f/1.7 Vivitar SLR lens to record the field of V392 Per. I’ll add a pic to my Member Page later this weekend.
Come along to Newcastle tomorrow. My talk won’t be flawless but I hope there’s something in there of interest. 🙂
Alex.
On Denis’ Member Page entry for May 2 a typo describes V 392 Per as a ‘comet’, so keep observing! 🙂
Clear skies,
Alex.
Hi Ian,
Many thanks for expressing an interest in these items. My message was posted last year and I should have updated it because all the Journals and Handbooks have now found good homes, such as with the BAA Archivists.
I noted in the For Sale column in the 2018 February Journal there is a set of Handbooks on offer.
Alternatively, as a BAA member you can download PDF versions of the Handbooks and Journals via the Publications – Downloads tabs on the BAA website. Another option would be to purchase the BAA Journal Archive on DVD from the BAA Shop.
Clear skies,
Alex.
…and this 6th mag ‘nova’ was a ghost image of Aldebaran…
http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=4513
Clear skies,
Alex.
Jeremy, in due course all contributing observers should receive a copy of the Lucky Star team’s paper, perhaps a preprint. Depending on where it’s published we’ll have to see if general readers have to negotiate a paywall, although the key results should wend their way into the public domain.
Ray, I’m just summarising the results of many observers. The real science will come from the work of Bruno’s team, hopefully revealing any changes in Triton’s atmosphere since 1989.
Cheers,
Alex.
Most observers of this asteroidal occultation have now reported their timings and the asteroid’s profile (derived from multiple chords) has been updated on Euraster (maintained by Eric Frappa). There’s still one or two reports to come in. There looks to be some discrepancies in the set of chords.
I’ll add the shape profile link to the observation on my member’s page.
Clear skies,
Alex.
Hi Dominic,
The video camera will output 25 interlaced frames per second (PAL) and the VTI timestamps each video field, 50 per second. Many occultation (and meteor observers) record to AVI files using a USB video grabber. Limovie and Tangra can read and analyse these at the deinterlaced field level. We use this to get good time resolution (0.02s) on lunar occultations and bright asteroidal events…
https://www.britastro.org/node/8992
The pairs of video fields from an integrating video camera will give (almost) identical images.
UFO Analyser processes meteor AVIs at field level to estimate the meteor’s velocity.
Cheers,
Alex.
Hi Tom,
If you are timing lunar impact flashes I guess a timing accuracy of only 0.1s is required to confirm a simultaneous event but researchers may prefer to 0.01s for light curve analysis.
Analogue video at 50 fields per second gives exposures of 0.02s per field, which is the fastest rate currently used by most occultation observers. All these GPS-linked VTIs have an accuracy of 1 – 100 microseconds.
For more information on VTIs and video camera timing delays (internal delays and integration effects) have a look at the work of Gerhard Dangl (AT) here.
Cheers,
Alex.
Hi Tom,
Wojciech Burzyński (PL) gave a talk on this at last year’s ESOP in Freiberg. The PDF of his presentation can be found here.
Using a 1PPS GPS receiver module they found that their Arduino-based VTI gave timing accuracies as good as the off-the-shelf IOTA-VTI and GPSBOXSPRITE2 models used by many occultation observers around the world.
Happy assembly!
Alex.
Hi Tony,
I have never seen a copy with the set of negative prints. When I visited Skalnate Pleso we were shown their collection of Becvar atlases and catalogues, so I might have been shown a special edition like yours, but I don’t recall it.
Len, the Stara Lesna ESOP was in 2007. As you know I was in Wakefield yesterday, assessing the extent of Melvyn’s collection of star atlas and catalogues. It includes Atlas Coeli and its Catalogue, so we can set them aside for you if you wish. Melvyn’s atlases have a personal touch because some pages contain his pencil sketches of the tracks of comets that he observed.
Clear skies,
Alex.
