Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Fabulous image Nick! I could not face an all nighter, but I did get up for about 20 minutes from 3:10am. Your image has very faithfully captured the colours.
Cheers,
Andy
Hi Steve,
I’ve done some very rough back of the envelope calculations. Assuming the separation is 0.062 AU and the period is 2.867 days. Then I get an orbital speed of 235 km/s, which in direct line of sight would equate to about 5 Angstroms around H-Alpha. However the shift would be twice this since at one stage it would be moving towards us, then half an orbit later away from us. So an overall 10 Angstrom shift, requiring a minimum resolution of about 600.
It is possible I’ve made a slip somewhere in my calculation, but if not then it could be an interesting challenge.
Cheers,
Andy
Hi Steve,
Those are both nice spectra with clear atmospheric O2 absorption and stellar hydrogen absorption lines.
That is an interesting project to look for a change in the doppler shift. I do not know the velocity of the various components so can’t comment further on feasibility, but a great idea.
Cheers,
Andy
That is another interesting spectrum Steve. It will be interesting to see if you spot any changes over time.
Cheers,
Andy
Hi John and Steve,
Do I have your permission to post some of your spectra to the VSS Facebook page? John I think your above spectrum of CH Cyg would make a very interesting post. Steve, I was thinking of posting one of you Chi Cyg spectra, if that is OK?
Thanks,
Andy
Hi John,
Those are some very interesting changes that you have picked up in the spectrum of CH Cygni. If you are correcting the spectrum for instrumental and atmospheric response then there is no need to normalise it. In fact those corrections are better than normalising the spectrum. The bumpy spectrum is that of the red giant in the system. Rather than a smooth continuum it has absorption bands, almost certainly due to titanium oxide in the star’s atmosphere.
For comparison here is a spectrum I took on 6th August.
Best wishes,
Andy
Hi Steve,
I’ll have my laptop at Sidmouth, so we can always look at it there. I’m staying in the area on both Friday and Saturday nights.
Cheers,
Andy
Hi Steve & David,
I agree a spectroscopy section or sub-section would be great. I’m certain this will be a prime topic of discussion at Sidmouth but good to discuss it on the forum as well. The observations on the forum have so far been of variable stars and meteors, not forgetting David Boyd’s excellent journal papers on variable star spectra. There are of course a wide range of other targets which BAA members may be interested in from solar system targets, to nebulae and perhaps the Sun.
How to approach this is tricky. I think a section in its own right would be good, if it had close ties with other sections. Though running a section is a non-trivial task, as well as of course requiring Council approval. Perhaps a sub-section would be easier to setup, but I guess by definition more limited in scope. With either option, the transition from informal online gathering to a group would require volunteers to answer enquiries and do the admin. The timing of Sidmouth is ideal as this will give a good indication of the amount of interest.
A related item up for discussion will be whether the BAA (and/or VSS) should create its own database for spectra. Similar to BeSS, but perhaps covering a wider range of objects. As the creator of the VSS online database, I’ve already had this idea floated in my direction..
Just a few of my thoughts!
Andy
Hi Steve,
Yes, I’ve seen that spreadsheet, though I’ve also been using one titled “MILES_SEARCH_V1_excel2010_64bit.xlsm”. This was created by Paolo Berardi and Marco Leonardi and can be accessed from the following ARAS thread.
http://www.spectro-aras.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=941
It may well has the same issues for you being designed for Excel, but you never know.
Yes, finding good reference stars can be rather tricky. I’ve certainly not got things working perfectly yet myself but I’m gaining experience and improving all the time.
I’ve got my presentation finished in draft. Just deciding what to keep and what to throw out.
Cheers,
Andy
That’s a really interesting spectrum of that symbiotic star Steve. The titanium oxide absorption bands are nice and clear in the red giant spectrum.
Cheers,
Andy
Hi Steve,
Great, the continuum did look as though it had been corrected. As I understand it to get best quality results using a reference star at similar altitude to the target is the important thing, within reason. I think I’m getting better at these corrections, but I still need more practice. I have been experimenting by taking spectra of 2 standard stars and comparing the correction curves.
Really nice results you got that night. It is fantastic when everything comes together.
Cheers,
Andy
Those a great spectra Steve. That really was a busy night for you with lots of different stars. The biggest obvious change I can see in chi Cyg is the H-Beta line has dropped in strength.
They look as though they might have instrument and atmospheric correction? Is that right?
Cheers,
Andy
Here is a high resolution spectrum that I took of chi Cygni on 10th September, “zooming” in on the hydrogen alpha emission line. The spectrum shows wonderful complexity at this level of detail, though I can’t say that I’m able to interpret most of it. I suspect a lot is due to molecular absorption bands.
I have tried to identify the absorption line at about 6572 Angstroms but to no avail. Neutral Yttrium and singly ionised calcium have lines in that region, but they may not be the cause of this absorption line.
Best wishes,
Andy
Hi Cam,
That is a fabulous image. You’ve got the structure in the nebula really coming out well along with some background nebulosity. What exposure was the image, and was this taken with your Williams Optics 81mm?
Best wishes,
Andy
Thanks Robin. Those are really useful links and information on response correction. I’m starting to get a handle on it but still plenty to learn!
Andy
Hi John,
Interesting to read your posts on David’s career. That is an impressive list of telescopes which he worked on, they must have contributed a wealth of data and discoveries.
Best wishes,
Andy
I forgot to mention that there is no need to match the spectral class of the reference star with the target star. The reason for choosing A stars, or if not a B star as a reference, is the spectra are very simple. So it is easy to smooth the response curve after dividing the spectra to get a curve that will act as a good response.
A good way to test a response curve is to take spectra of 2 A or B stars in the Miles database at similar airmass (altitude), using one to create the response curve, and then correct the other and compare it with the Miles database. A good fit means you are doing it right, though I still usually find they are not quite the same. Low resolution can be tricky.
I also think using the same reference stars is an excellent idea. It does need to be very close to the target so that its altitude stays similar as the 2 stars track across the sky.
Best wishes,
Andy
Hi Steve and John,
That is a great spectrum John. These are exciting times as spectroscopy is becoming more easily available to amateurs, and there are plenty of fascinating targets.
My understanding of response correction is that to get a really good atmospheric correction you need to find an A or B star of similar airmass (altitude) to your target star, and with a professional spectrum available. There are ways to get a good compromise, but for the very best results this is the way to go.
There are a couple of very handy resources that make this much easier. First there is the Miles database of standard spectra. Second a spreadsheet that allows you to locate stars from the Miles database of similar airmass to your target at the time of observation. The ARAS forum post on this subject can be found here:
http://www.spectro-aras.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=941
Best wishes,
Andy
