Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 321 through 340 (of 909 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584555
    Nick James
    Participant

    CBET 5007 has designated this as Nova Vul 2021 = V606 Vul. To quote: “R. Leadbeater, Wigton, U.K., writes that a low-resolution (R about 500) spectrogram taken on July 16.915 UT (instrumentation not specified) shows strong Balmer lines in emission showing P-Cyg profiles with an estimated velocity of about 1400 km/s, adding that there are other broad emission lines including He; the spectrogram has been posted at website URL https://britastro.org/specdb/data_graph.php?obs_id=10094.”

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584551
    Nick James
    Participant

    Interesting to read that ATEL. I’ve managed to observe it on 12 of the 14 nights since discovery and my unfiltered photometry shows it still rising as of last night.

    in reply to: Error in ASIIMG FITS header #584543
    Nick James
    Participant

    Sort of. They still allow DATE-OBS to be anything the developer likes as long as it is indicated in a comment. That means that you have to parse comments to find out what the keyword means. That is a pretty rubbish “standard” in my view. As an engineer the FITS standard is pretty much the kind of thing that I would expect a scientist to write…

    in reply to: Error in ASIIMG FITS header #584537
    Nick James
    Participant

    The FITS “standard” is irritatingly vague about things like this and, particularly for astrometry, it is really important to know what DATE-OBS means. In most software these days it is the time that the exposure starts but sometimes it isn’t. In “good” software there is often a comment along the lines of:

    DATE-OBS= ‘2021-07-26T22:03:10’ / Start of exposure

    but often there isn’t and so it is always worth checking for whatever image acquisition and processing software you use.

    in reply to: Nova Cas 2021 #584519
    Nick James
    Participant

    Stewart, Yes, it’s back up to 5.6 unfiltered tonight (July 26) which is not far short of its brightest at the previous peak. I’m doing 1s exposures and it is not far off saturating my camera. It is very hazy here but I think I’ll get the binoculars out again.

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584493
    Nick James
    Participant

    The nova is about 0.3 mag brighter tonight (July 20) than it was yesterday. My unfiltered photometry is around 0.4 mag brighter than V band since the nova is so red but the trend is pretty clear.  Of the other novae around V1405 Cas is brightening again although still around a magnitude below its brightest and V1674 Her is very gradually fading after its initial rapid decline. 

    in reply to: CG Dra: a VSS campaign #584488
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, it looks to be at the bottom of a cycle.

    in reply to: Nova Vul 2021 #584473
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here’s the field. I get it around mag 12 (unfiltered re Gaia G) and a position of 20:21:07.71 +29:14:08.9 (Gaia DR2).

    in reply to: IX Dra: observations requested #584444
    Nick James
    Participant

    My last observation was on July 7.9 at 16.52. It’s in the BAA database. Richard Sargent also got some observations later that night at around 16.10. They are in the database too.

    in reply to: Line interactive UPS #584441
    Nick James
    Participant

    I have a ten year old APC UPS in my observatory and it is on permanently, but so is the observatory PC that it powers and a few other cameras and sensors. They are designed to be on permanently but, like all electrical things, don’t like getting damp.

    in reply to: “Losing the Sky” event this evening #584372
    Nick James
    Participant

    Daryl – There are certainly a lot more trails on my images this summer compared to previous years. For imagers the way that you stack subframes can help to a certain extent. The animated GIF attached is the same frame stacked as average and as sigma clip. There are 5 satellite trails on this image, two bright ones and three faint. The sigma clip stack definitely suppresses the bright ones. Photometrically the two stacks are the same. 

    in reply to: Nova in Hercules #584362
    Nick James
    Participant

    CBET 4977 has designated this nova as V1674 Her.

    in reply to: Nova in Hercules #584357
    Nick James
    Participant

    I’ve just measured it as 7.54 (2021 June 13 22:51) compared to 5.94 at this time last night. Both unfiltered ref to Gaia DR2 G so somewhere between V and R. That’s a fall of 1.6 mags in day. That’s pretty fast. I remember photographing V838 Her (George Alcock’s last nova) in 1991 but only getting it on one occasion since it faded so fast. 

    in reply to: Nova in Hercules #584342
    Nick James
    Participant

    Another bright nova! Here’s my image https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20210612_231222_b0ed29be83050b55. I’ve taken some 1s exposures too which I’ll measure later.

    in reply to: 2021 June 10 partial eclipse livestream #584330
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here are my edited highlights from yeasterday: https://youtu.be/MoRfhjLTS8k. From Chelmsford I managed about 15 mins at the beginning and end but it was cloudy for the rest of the time.

    in reply to: Tom Boles has written a novel! #584328
    Nick James
    Participant

    I too have ordered a copy. Tom’s unsolicited email campaign is clearly working! I wonder if the plot includes a hero who drives his car at supersonic speeds but is shopped to the local feds by a trusted colleague?

    in reply to: 2021 June 10 partial eclipse livestream #584317
    Nick James
    Participant

    Gary. Aren’t you at the ground? I was looking forward to an eclipse drawing from the posh stand at Edgbaston.

    in reply to: 2021 June 10 partial eclipse livestream #584311
    Nick James
    Participant

    Very cloudy in Chelmsford at the moment after a cloudless day yesterday. Weather satellite shows it clear at the moment up the east coast and in the North Sea and a few clear patches elsewhere. Fingers crossed for some breaks later.

    in reply to: 2021 June 10 partial eclipse livestream #584307
    Nick James
    Participant

    This is the link for my eclipse livestream on Thursday morning https://youtu.be/DtqzzB5xAF8.  The forecast for here looks encouraging at the moment.

    in reply to: Starlink Flares? #584306
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here is a speeded up video of your flares from Chelmsford. I have lots of cheap IP cameras pointing in all directions recording video in a 7-day cycle so I still had this from Sunday morning. There is quite of lot of cloud but Altair is visible just left of centre and Delphinus is visible through the cloud. I’m around 37 miles SW of you as the crow flies so my flares were probably not as impressive as yours. 

Viewing 20 posts - 321 through 340 (of 909 total)