Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
My latest observation was on March 9.8 when it was 15.39 (ref Gaia G). My data is in the VSS database.
The nova has been steadily brightening for a few weeks and tonight I get it at 17.42. At this rate it will be brighter than the close star just to the north in a few days. An interesting object to follow just as Cassiopeia is getting low in the north. How bright will it get?
Yes, the first comet photos, by Underwood and Bond, were of C/1858 L1 (Donati) in 1858. With the help of Mike Maunder we estimated that these would have been taken using Collodion plates that had a sensitivity of around 0.05 to 0.1 ISO . By the time of Lockyer’s attempts in 1874 he would have been using gelatine plates with a sensitivity of maybe 0.2 ISO. No wonder it was so hard to photograph a comet but even then people knew to use short, fast lenses. Did Lockyer try any photography using a portrait lens? Eight years later, in 1882, Gill got his famous photo of C/1882 R1 which led to the Cart du Ciel project.
I don’t have mine yet either but the post in Chelmsford is badly affected by Covid and, possibly the inch of snow that fell on Monday.
The AAVSO lightcurve shows recent observations between 18-19 which I am sure are wrong. I’ve been keeping this star under regular observation and I have not seen it this bright since early January. The nova is only a few arcsec south of a 17th mag star and I think that is affecting measurements. In the thumbnail below, taken from my image of last night, the nova is visible faintly between that star and a fainter one further to the south. The fainter star is 18.5 and the third star at the right angle of the triangle is fainter than 19. The nova is much fainter than that. I get 20.1 in a 4 arcsec radius aperture which is offset 2 arcsec south to avoid including the 17th mag star.
The nova is just visible on an image taken tonight at around mag 20. I’ve not seen it on stacks with a similar limiting magnitude to tonight’s image so it may be on the rise again.
That was interesting breakfast reading. The last time I imaged one of these was when V838 Mon erupted 18 years ago. CCDs were much smaller then!
My original post, which I’ve deleted, marked the wrong object. The new one is correct but has a later timestamp. Robin’s reply hasn’t violated the rules of causality.
Here it is from 2021-01-30T23:46:28 against a very lumpy galaxy background. Astrometry matches the quoted position to within 1 arcsec.
Not to do with darks. I’m using the same darks for my camera that I’ve been using since the beginning of last year. I have a library of darks for each exposure that I use and I never scale them. CMOS cameras generally have much lower read noise than CCD cameras so stacking loads of short exposures works well. This has benefits in the stacking process since outliers (satellite trails, the odd badly guided image etc. can get rejected in the stacking process. You are right that CCD sensors are becoming specialist items now limited to a very few applications. Even cameras on spacecraft are gradually making the transition.
Assuming you can find the lost widget this is what to expect from the NEQ6 once you’ve modded it. This is the unguided performance. In this case the exposures are 60s so the graph covers around an hour. The Dec drift is due to polar misalignment (this is a “portable” mount) but the 8 minute periodic error in RA is clear and it has a peak-to-peak amplitude of around 15 arcsec (the scale is pixels which are 2.1″). It is very smooth too and guides out easily if you can be bothered. I don’t bother and just rely on relatively short exposures (60s) and stacking. That is a pretty good approach for CMOS sensors anyway and makes for a very easy imaging setup. This plot corresponds to the performance obtaining this image.
All the pain is definitely worth it. I have a belt-modded NEQ6 and it tracks very well with remarkably small and smooth PE for such small gears.
Presumably, as Haynes manuals used to say: “reassembly is the reverse of disassembly” although I’ve generally found that springs make disassembly a one-way process.
Yes, I think a hot water bottle is a bit pathetic really. What kind of engineer are you? A propane blowtorch would be better, particularly if the thread is loctited. When I was doing some work on my mount in the summer I bought one of the cheap cookery ones from Amazon. It worked for me. If it doesn’t work to free your thread you can always make a creme brulee.
Can’t help you with the NEQ6 (I have one of the belt-modded ones but the mod was done before I bought it) but I’m sure Mrs. Beeton won’t be too happy to see her cookbook used in this way.
Yes, I thought this one would be a challenge. It had a whole galaxy to go off in and it did it next to a relatively bright field star! How big is the slit you use and can you orient it to avoid that star?
Here’s an image of it from Jan 12.9. It is a difficult object to measure since there is a 17th mag star around 3 arcsec north of it. I get 17.9 tonight.
