Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 621 through 640 (of 900 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BAA Christmas Meeting Video #580381
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, the “official” recording won’t be much different to that. We’ll just chop out all of the interval stuff and upload the talks as individual items.

    in reply to: Spectrum of Comet 46P/Wirtanen #580373
    Nick James
    Participant

    Robin, That’s a really nice demonstration of the difference betwen the gas and dust in the coma.

    in reply to: Christmas meeting Livestream #580372
    Nick James
    Participant

    Lars. Glad you enjoyed it and found it useful. It’s certainly something that we want to do again when we can.

    in reply to: Christmas meeting Livestream #580371
    Nick James
    Participant

    Hi Ronan. Glad you enjoyed the meeting watching from the west of Ireland. Yes I remember the wonderfully dark skies in Mayo and I hope you’re getting a great view of 46P when the weather cooperates.

    in reply to: Christmas meeting Livestream #580368
    Nick James
    Participant

    We’ll certainly try to do this again when we have the opportunity. I’ve just watched a few clips from the meeting on Youtube and the quality is very good. This was a learning experience for us but it worked well and we had around 30 people watching the livestream.

    We could livestream this meeting because that the IoP had the facilities and expertise to provide a very good user experience. This is not the case at our other venues. Hopefully we’ll be back at the IoP soon so that we can do this again and, hopefully, some of the other venues we use would be able to offer this in the future.

    Thanks again to the IoP for hosting the meeting and to Hazel Collett for the excellent organisation.

    Happy Christmas and look out for that comet (and those meteors and variable stars).

    Nick.

    in reply to: Christmas meeting Livestream #580361
    Nick James
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback. It sounds as if it worked pretty well.

    in reply to: Christmas meeting Livestream #580338
    Nick James
    Participant

    Well, I suppose if we moved it from Winchester to the IoP building in Kings Cross that would work…

    in reply to: Nova in M31 #580306
    Nick James
    Participant

    Are you using background from PSF or background from aperture? I think you should always use the latter since the PSF background estimator needs a much biffer photometric aperture to work properly. They often give very different magnitude zero points.

    in reply to: Nova in M31 #580304
    Nick James
    Participant

    George. Congrats on another nice discovery. I’m getting 17.4 unfiltered (UCAC-4 R band) tonight (see attached). I think the photometric apertures that you are using in Astrometrica may be a bit small. This may lead to some problems with it estimating the sky background.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580254
    Nick James
    Participant

    Recent magnitude estimates indicate that this comet is not brightening very quickly and latest estimates put it around mag 9. It will get increasingly difficult to observe as its elongation decreases but please try to get more images and estimates as it heads in to perihelion. There is a good set of images in the Comet Section archive.

    in reply to: comet Panther 1980 #580253
    Nick James
    Participant

    Lars, The ephemeris from the MPC that Peter gave is about as good as it gets. Any differences in the 1981 ephemeris will be due to a different epoch (B1950 vs J2000) and fewer observations. I’ve attached an ephemeris from JPL Horizons wich is very similar to the MPC one. I’ve also attached a scan of BAA Circular 615 from 1981 March 4 which includes an ephemeris based on only 12 positions over a short arc so you can compare.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580235
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes there is. You can see it better in the stack attached. This is stacked on stars so the comet is trailed and the background is not yet sorted but it shows the ion tail going out of the field.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580232
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here’s a quick process of a widefield image I took this morning with Denis Buczynski in northern Scotland. I’ll do a better job of processing this later and put the result on my members page. The galaxy is NGC4753.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580229
    Nick James
    Participant

    David – Great image showing the tail. Denis and I managed to get some astrometry on it this morning but the conditions were poor so our images are rubbish. 

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580221
    Nick James
    Participant

    Official designation is C/2018 V1.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580220
    Nick James
    Participant

    Probably 7.5 – 8.0 this morning. Any predictions will be very unreliable since it could be in the final stages of a bright outburst or not. Getting up early to observe it is the only way to find out!

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580217
    Nick James
    Participant

    Owen. Yes, Andrew Robertson and Peter Carson had a good view through Andrew’s 18-inch telescope at Haw Wood. They commented that the comet was bright and easy. 

    The latest ephemeris is here using all astrometry I have so far. I’ve done this starting 60 days before now and the positional uncertainties are now quite small. The comet has been at a small elongation for all of this time and was discovered when it was at its largest elongation. This is now decreasing. The comet has a small q (0.39 au) and is brightening rapidly.

    Please try to observe this comet at any opportunity.

    Nick. 

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580214
    Nick James
    Participant

    Denis and I managed to image this comet this morning from Scotland. I’ve just posted a very quick process of one of the images here.

    in reply to: new visual comet discovery by Don Machholz #580209
    Nick James
    Participant

    I gave a talk to Newbury Astro Soc last Friday when I said that it was now very unlikely that we would get visual comet discoveries. How wrong I was! Congratulations to Don and the other independent discoverers of this comet.

    An ephemeris based on all the available astrometry up to this morning is here. It was produced using Bill Gray’s FindOrb. These elements are still very uncertain but it looks like it is heading to a perihelion in early December. It is currently moving south and the elongation is decreasing so it will become increasingly difficult to observe. From the UK it is currently a morning object amongst the galaxies in Virgo. The column headed “/sig gives some idea of the position uncertainty (in arcsec).

    Any observations (astrometry, photometry or images) would be gratefully received. 

    in reply to: Nominate a scientist for the new £50 note #580195
    Nick James
    Participant

    Good to see scientists getting this recognition and thanks for the link. It was always a shame that Isaac Newton made it to the pound note just before it was scrapped. I wonder if they could bring him back for the £50?

    I like the “draw your own banknote” link. I could do that. I doubt my local shop would accept it though!

Viewing 20 posts - 621 through 640 (of 900 total)