Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 621 through 640 (of 864 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Maurice Gavin #579586
    Nick James
    Participant

    That’s really sad news. Maurice was a great observer who always got into a field before anyone else did. I remember marvelling at his CCD images in the early days of the electronic era.

    in reply to: BAA meeting video #579579
    Nick James
    Participant

    Robin – I’m not aware of any recordings of that meeting.

    in reply to: BAA meeting video #579576
    Nick James
    Participant

    Thanks Jeremy. It was just like old times for me reading out the list of papers!

    in reply to: Christchurch Weekend Meeting #579575
    Nick James
    Participant

    Peter – That’s a shame but, as others have said, we have constraints too and so it is not always possible to avoid a clash.

    in reply to: V392 Per – first results from a beginner #579574
    Nick James
    Participant

    Nice spectra of a very interesting object.

    in reply to: BAA meeting video #579573
    Nick James
    Participant

    Lars. Thanks. It’s great to know that these are appreciated.

    in reply to: BAA meeting video #579572
    Nick James
    Participant

    The other talks are now up on our website here.

    in reply to: 2010 WC9 #579485
    Nick James
    Participant

    David, Thanks for the heads up on this. I imaged it this morning using a widefield instrument so the trail is small but it is visible. The observation is here.

    in reply to: Nova in Perseus #579446
    Nick James
    Participant

    Brilliant work. These absolute spectra really show the evolution well.

    Do you think physics will ever adopt SI units? It is one of the significant differences between physics and engineering and I have to keep looking up the scale factor between ergs and Joules. I suppose CGS is better than BTUs and feet…

    in reply to: Nova in Perseus #579428
    Nick James
    Participant

    So it does. Denis is a very dedicated comet observer not so used to imaging bright point sources that don’t move…

    in reply to: Nova in Perseus #579427
    Nick James
    Participant

    Mike. Very nice. That H-alpha emission is very strong.

    in reply to: Nova in Perseus #579410
    Nick James
    Participant

    After a nice day the evening was very hazy with a lot of cirrus but I did manage to get a picture of it in a small gap. The attached is a single 15s exposure at ISO800 with a 100mm f/2 lens at f/2.8. Capella is the bright star at lower left. The nova appears very red on this image.

    in reply to: Nova in Perseus #579400
    Nick James
    Participant

    Great stuff. Now if only we could get a clear sky in the southeast of England…

    in reply to: Solar transit of the ISS 25 April 2018 and AR12706 #579393
    Nick James
    Participant

    Great video. If you stack the frames using minimum pixel hold you should be able to get a nice still showing it moving across. I’ve only ever succesfully imaged this once on 2011 May 25 using a DSLR. Each video frame was minimum pixel stacked to get this effect.

    in reply to: Ooops! #579309
    Nick James
    Participant

    A seminal paper. Kudos for referencing Kepler’s 1619 Harmonices Mundi.

    in reply to: USB over Ethernet #579279
    Nick James
    Participant

    Indeed. I’ve been doing this for years with a cheap Dell in the observatory. My PC death rate is around one death every 2-3 years but I keep a disk image so replacement is dead easy. Windows RDP is certainly secure enough to use on an internal network. I wouldn’t expose it directly to the internet though unless your network firewall can restrict access to particular IPs.

    in reply to: JD to BJD convertion #579278
    Nick James
    Participant

    The GPL Positional Astronomy Library (PAL) can be found on Github here. It is an open-source reworking of Patrick Wallace’s slalib and it contains all the functions you need to do this. Alternatively the original slalib in Fortran is GPL and should be available somewhere. Even if you can’t use these functions directly they are a good source of information on how to do the conversion accurately.

    in reply to: Ooops! #579252
    Nick James
    Participant

    Excellent. Good job Prof. Dunsby has got a sense of humour!

    in reply to: Michael Hendrie #579210
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, that’s the micrometer. Imagine taking a long exposure of a comet (30 mins to an hour) using offset guiding on a star. The micrometer was rotated to the appropriate PA and then used to get the correct offset rate. If you messed up you wouldn’t know until you developed the single film frame sometime later. Imaging was really hard work in those days! Have a look at this example and read the caption to see what I mean.

    in reply to: Michael Hendrie #579199
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, Mike will be very sadly missed. He was director of the Comet Section at a key time which included the return of 1P/Halley. Mike edited the BAA Memoir on this comet which was a huge undertaking. We have the Newsletters from that time available online via the link in here and they are a good example of how different observing was in those far off days. The attached pics show Mike with the 25cm reflector he used for his Halley imaging and the 6-inch Cooke that he used for his prominence images that Richard has posted.

Viewing 20 posts - 621 through 640 (of 864 total)