Peter Carson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 90 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: dehumidifiers #578983
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Nick,

    For many years I used to run two small 60w tubular heaters located close to the mount and telescope which was covered with a large cotton sheet “tent”. The heaters where controlled by a time switch that put them on for a few hours generally before dawn when the equipment was at its coldest. This worked well in most situations. However in the late autumn when weather conditions can change rapidly between near freezing temperatures to a mild south westerly maritime airstream I still occasionally suffered condensation problems.

    Last summer I reduced the ventilation in the dome and installed a desiccant type dehumidifier which I run manually for a couple of hours on occasions when I think the conditions are likely to produce condensation or after I’ve shut the observatory up following an observing run.

    Since installing the dehumidifier I’ve not noticed any condensation problems even during weather conditions that would have previously been an issue.

    It’s important to purchase a desiccant based dehumidifier as the refrigerant types do not work at cold temperatures. The dehumidifier need not be large and can easily be purchased from most domestic appliance suppliers.

    Peter

    in reply to: 2017 – how was it for you? #578915
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    In 2017 I observed on 118 nights from home. I count observations in the morning and evening of the same day as one clear night but an observing session that spans midnight as two clear nights. In 2016 I only managed 99 clear nights. I don’t keep a record of how many clear nights there are when I’m not at home or doing something else (tut-tut) but I was under clear skies at astrocamps or other observing sessions away from home on 6 occassions last year that are not in my stats.
    The best month was a tie between March and November and the worst month was June.
    Things have started well this year with a 100% clear sky record…but it is only Jan 2nd!

    Peter

    in reply to: PNV J00425895+4126279 #578547
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Attached is my image of PNV J00425895+4126279 taken on the night of 2017 Sept 10th at 22.06UT. I measured its brightness as mag 16.0. R UCAC4

    in reply to: Astronomer or not? #578525
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi All,
    20 years ago I would have said astronomers were not genuine unless they got frozen at their telescopes and had light going into their eyes that had travelled across space for millions of years. Today I still call myself an astronomer even though like Nick and Andrew S my telescope can do its own thing while I’m doing something else. Sometimes the camera never comes off the scope for months at a times.
    However I’m best satisfied when I’m out under a really dark sky with my binoculars and and a sun lounger. Perhaps all this technology is really a substitute for a good honest non light polluted night sky.
    Peter

    in reply to: Perseids #578461
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I led a party of 13 observers from my local atsronomy club (Castle Point Astronomy Club) to a dark site on the east Essex marshes near Dengie. I was mainly clear when we arrived, but as it went dark and the stars began to show so did the clouds.
    We gave up at about 11.00hrs BST as it didn’t look like things were going to improve.
    However back at home in Southend I had my all sky camera going and later in the night a few holes in the cloud appeared and I caught two decent Perseids. One at 01.38UT, the same one as Nick recorded from Chelmsford and another 6 minutes earlier at 01.32UT. The hole in the cloud was short lived and the rest of the night was clouded out.
    Images attached.

    in reply to: C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) #578258
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Nick mentioned in the previous post that I got some astrometry of C/2017K2 after I arrived home from yesterday’s meeting at Burlington House. I’ve attached the image I took of the comet in the hope that in 2023 you can all laugh at it whilst gazing in awe at the bright naked eye comet hanging in the sky that C/2017K2 will turn into….maybe!!

    in reply to: BAA Meeting ‘Video’ for 1997 October! #578206
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I remember Patrick giving that talk at Saville row all those years ago…..I must be getting old!
    Worth a listen again though.
    Peter

    in reply to: FocusMax #578204
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I’m a regular user of FocusMax. I’ve not had any problems downloading or using it. It does a much better job of focusing than MaxIm or manually focusing the scope. I did have an issue with the last software upgrade which had a bug in it. Steve Brady, its creator, was on the case and resolved the problem within hours.

    in reply to: Spring meeting at Eastbourne #578162
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Graham,

    I’m driving down and back on the day…but it’s not as far for me. I’ll see you there.
    I might be tempted to an after meeting quick beer.

    in reply to: Email contact button #578084
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Thanks Callum, I’m usually logged in when I’m browsing the site so obviously wasn’t able to see the link.
    I’m happy now.
    Peter

    in reply to: Venus approaches inferior conjunction #578067
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi,
    A group of us using Andrew Robertson’s Mak-Cass telescope observed Venus at around 15.45hrs yesterday afternoon during an astro camp at Haw Wood farm in Suffolk. Venus was at Inferior Conjunction at the time and I was really suprised how easy it was to see in the telescope set again the pale blue sky.
    This was a first for me and something I will remember …thanks Andrew.

    in reply to: Condensation #577952
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I have a fibreglass dome and walls containing my 315mm reflector on a Paramount. I’ve got a built in damp proof membrane in the floor and the building is completely watertight. However my dome is not draught proof enough to dehumidify the building, I would be dehumidifying the whole world, so I cover the telescope and mount with a cotton sheet and use two 60 watt tubular heaters to warm the air space and raise the dew point. That works most of the time but occasionally when the ambient temperature warms rapidly I do get condensation on the Paramount and sometimes the telescope mirror, so I should really try to cure that. I leave my PC out in the observatory and have only had one failure in about 10 years.

    in reply to: 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdusakova in the morning sky #577918
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Here’s my image of 45P taken at the same time as Nick’s (2017 Feb 3rd 06.03 UT), but from my observatory. The comet was only 10 degrees altitude and in all the light pollution and murk over Southend Airport which is about a mile away. From my observatory there is only one small section of sky that I can view down to a low altitude and the comet was nicely placed in it!
    I was expecting 45P to be much brighter. Lets hope it improves over the next few days.

    in reply to: Observing stats – how was 2016 for you? #577782
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Here in Essex there were 99 clear dates in 2016. I count clear dates, so a morning and evening observing session on the same day count as 1 clear date, but a nights observing session that spans midnight counts as 2 clear dates. (It would be easier if I used the Julian calendar).
    January, February and August tied first with 11 clear dates each, June was the worst with just 2.
    I made the largest number of comet observations in November (58) although there were only 9 clear dates, presumably because of the long nights.
    I achieved 410 comet observations in total via CCD. Those observations generated about 1200 astrometric measure submissions to the Minor Planets Centre.

    in reply to: Comet 45P Honda-Mrkos-Padusakova #577776
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    A well grabbed image Nick, from a site with somewhat better horizons than my back garden!
    I’ve attempted to image 45P from my garden observatory near Southend  a couple of times over the last few evenings but there are just too many obstructions. Give it a week or two for it to rise higher and I might get my first picture.

    in reply to: Klim Churyumov #577523
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Sad day, but at least he got to see “his” comet 67P close up before his passing.

    in reply to: LIGHT POLLUTION IN THE USA #577434
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    It seems to me there is a recent increased worldwide awareness of the detrimental effects of light pollution. I suspect though that by the time it works its way up the action priority list many years will have past and the light pollution will have got many times worse.

    However, let’s not get too depressed and remind imagers in particular there is a vast amount of useful and enjoyable astronomy that can be done from a light polluted site.  So many people assume that because they can’t see the Milky Way or a 4th Mag star visually that nothing else is possible. I have poor light polluted skies here in SE Essex and still manage to image 18+ magnitude comets using my 315mm reflector.

    in reply to: Transit of Mercury #577362
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Had a great day. About 19 members of my local astro club descended on my garden with Ha, calcium K and white light scopes. The wine, beer and cheese and biscuits are now all consumed and I’ve just started looking at my images. I’d left my DSLR automatically taking pictures through my 100 mm refractor in my observatory. Most of the pictures are of cloud or the inside of my observatory dome but some came out OK.

    Peter

    in reply to: BAA website survey #577242
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hello Jeremy,

    Thought you should be aware I didn’t get an email either, the BAA have my email address as I recieve other mail.

    I’ve completed the survey. Hope it produces some useful data.

    Peter

    in reply to: C/2013 US10 (Catalina) #577157
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    It was a cold and moonlit morning here in Essex, but I decided to find a darkish spot near the SE Essex marshes and image comet 2013US10 Catalina. My 200mm telephoto lens and a stack of 16 x 10 second exposures recorded the dust and gas tails. The image at 05.52hrs UT was squeezed in at the start of astronomical twilight but before the sky brightened too much. The comet was only 5 degrees above the horizon at the time of the image. When the comet moves further away from the Sun it should be a good one!

    Peter

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 90 total)