Peter Carson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 90 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chocolate telescope #583156
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I like chocolate and I like telescopes! I reckon I could eat that in one observing session.

    in reply to: Change from electronic only to paper based membership #583133
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Alan,

    Yes there are several members who have made the transfer in that direction. Make contact with the BAA Office during working hours (as Dominic’s message above) and  they will make the change for you.

    Peter

    Peter Carson
    Membership Coordinator

    in reply to: USB 2 SX camera on USB 3 port? #583053
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Jeremy,

    I use a 15 year old Sbig camera via USB 3.0 and it works OK. Cable lengths up to 5m are Ok if you’re using a USB 2 device on a USB 2 or 3 port but be careful if you move to a USB 3 camera. It won’t work if the cable is longer than 3m or if the cable is of poor quality. I’ve had all sorts of issues with USB 3 camera and cables types and lengths at my remote observatory. (All working fine now)

    Peter

    in reply to: Darks #583052
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Jack,

    I built up a library of dark, bias and flat frames for my CCD camera that I reused many times over. Provided your light  and dark images are taken at the same camera temperature and duration then darks and bias images can be reused for a long period. I refreshed my library about every year, not that I needed to but just thought I ought to. Flat frames can be reused provided the focus position remains the same and the camera has not been re-orientated or moved in any other way.

    I’ve just moved on to a CMOS camera and am re using the darks and flats. Does any have an opinion about the re use of CMOS calibration frames?

    Peter

    in reply to: C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) #582738
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Better luck this morning. I watched this comet rise in binoculars and followed it until daylight. Lovely sight. It was just visible to the naked eye as a point of light.

    Very lucky with the weather.

    Peter

    in reply to: C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) #582719
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Nick,

    I gave it a go. At around 03:00BST all looked good but by the time the comet had cleared the horizon it was behind the only lump of cloud in the sky!

    Oh well, back to bed.

    Peter

    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I watched the Venus Moon Occultation this morning from sunny Spain.

    See my images here

    https://britastro.org/node/22733

    https://britastro.org/node/22732

    https://britastro.org/node/22731

    Venus was brighter than I had expected and is a little over exposed. I couldn’t make the exposures any shorter as the camera was already on its shortest setting.

    in reply to: Huge atmospheric experiment starting #582116
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I operate a meteor camera as part of the NEMETODE network. My camera is aimed NE from my home in SE Essex and the main incoming continental air lane crosses it’s field of view.
    Because the detection software can’t distinguish between the movement of a meteor and an aircraft I usually get over 200 false detections a night. Last night I got just 25!!

    It made this morning’s weeding out of false detections much quicker. Can’t think of many advantages of a pandemic but lack of “sky clutter” has got to be one.

    Peter

    in reply to: Favourable Quadrantids #581870
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Three of us from my local atsronomy club went to a fairly dark local site to view the Quadrantids between 04.00hrs and 06.00hrs. The weather was mixed with quite long periods of total cloud cover. Despite the cloud we recorded 49 Quadrantids which I class as a success.
    I recorded 41 Quadrantids on my home meteor camera.
    I’m a bit tired now!

    Peter

    in reply to: Mystery comets #581802
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    After a happy hour or two with Astrometry.net and JPL Horizons I’ve come up with these solutions:

    Print 2
    Comet C/1969Y1 Bennett
    1970 May 23rd at around 00.00hrs + or – 1hr UT
    Up is 7.61 degrees E of N
    FOV 12.8 x 9.21 degs

    Print 3
    Comet C/1969Y1 Bennett
    1970 May 6th at approx 04.40UT
    Up is 358 degrees E of N
    FOV 13 x 9.18 deg

    Print 4
    Comet C/1969Y1 Bennett
    1970 May 4th at approx 01.15UT
    Up is 358 degrees E of N
    FOV 13 x 9.18 deg

    Would someone like to check out my conclusions?
    Can’t help with observers though!

    Peter

    in reply to: Prediction of high activity of alpha Monocerotid shower #581633
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    A friend and I went to a dark site at 4am for around 70 minutes. The sky was a perfectly clear on our arrival but it soon degenerated into patchy cloud then clouded over completely and started raining about the time of the predicted maximum.

    I did see a couple of bright sporadics and one very bright meteor through the clouds that could have been an Alpha Monocerotid, its path was about right but no stars were visible for reference. It must have been bright to have been plainly visible through the clouds.

    My meteor camera didn’t pick up anything.

    Peter

    in reply to: Pulsar 2.7m request #581612
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Tim,

    I can’t help you with an observatory visit I’m afaid but would like to make a comment.
    I was considering the purchase of a pulsar dome some time ago but decided the opening aperture was too narrow and didn’t go far enough over the zenith.
    Other dome manufacturers provide much wider opening slot apertures and go further over the zenith so are more useful if you’ve got a telescope with a piggyback guide or second scope.
    Just thought I’d say!

    Peter

    in reply to: Transit of Mercury #581577
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Here’s my image of the transit using a Motorola phone held over the eyepiece of BAA member Dave Smith’s 75mm refractor.

    in reply to: Future of Yerkes Observatory #581557
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Thanks for passing on the good news. At one time it looked like it would get bulldozed by greedy developers. That would have been a crime.

    in reply to: Fireball spectrum #581516
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    An excellent observation. Luck plays a part but so does knowing what you’re doing!  Unfortunately like Alex I was under cloud. Hopefully there will be someone in the NEMETODE group with clear skies to provide data that will help will an orbit.

    Very well done.

    Peter

    in reply to: BAA weekend Meeting, Armagh, Northern Ireland #581373
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I agree the weekend meeting in Armagh was excellent, thanks to the organisers and attendees. The private tour of the observatory was a highlight which I followed up with a trip south to visit Birr. (In the pouring rain!) It was very interesting to see the work that linked the two sites.

    Peter

    in reply to: Vega 2019 International Spectroscopy Symposium #581115
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Hi Jack,

    Looks like a very attractive observatory facility and worth the trip.

    So you’ll be all fired up for the Spectroscopy software training workshop on the 24th Aug.

    Peter

    in reply to: focus specific flats. #581038
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    I take flats, made up of about 50 averaged images, each time something in the optical train changes, like moving the camera or a new blob of dust appears or I use the camera at a different set tempetature. I redo the flats if the season changes but nothing else has changed. However apart from that I keep using the same ones. I’ve experimented and can’t find any decernable improvement if I take flats every time I slightly tweak the focus.

    in reply to: How tall is a giraffe? #580708
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Like that helps?

    I’ve only got a vague idea how big a Queen size bed is, I assume the Queen needs a bigger bed than the one I sleep in. I’ve only seen a giraffe at a zoo when I was a kid and that’s a distant memory.

    I’ll stick with metres, kilometres and miles, I know how big they are.

    in reply to: Observatory Planning Permission #580696
    Peter Carson
    Participant

    Fortunately where I live an observatory is considered permitted development by the Local Authority providing it’s single storey with maximum eaves height of 2.5 metres and maximum overall height of four metres with a dual pitched roof or three metres for any other roof.

    I had planned to elevate my observatory in the centre of the garden which would have made it taller than 3 metres so modified my desires. Unfortunately my wife’s conditions required that the building not be on view from any window at the back of the bungalow, which was a far more serious constraint. Our garden does extend around one side of the properly so that was the only “permitted” location. This placed it in amongst the greenhouse and other sheds which was not ideal because they caused restrictions on the amount of sky viewable, but there it was erected. However, that was 25 years ago, now most of my neighbours either have bright garden floodlights or illuminate their gardens at night so having the observatory tucked away in the shadow of other buildings has proved very useful indeed.

    I have since thanked my wife for being so farsighted!

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 90 total)