Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 481 through 491 (of 491 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Laser use at public events #577259
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I think you will find that laser ranging sites like Herstmonceux do not issue NOTAMs every night they work. I believe they operate by always having staff with the system and making sure the sky is clear of aircraftby visual inspection while the laser is active.

    Their laser is a tad brighter than those most people use at star parties.

    in reply to: Alt-Az mount for DSLR photometry? #577221
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    No reason at all you cannot do photometry this way. Keep the exposure short, position the target at the field centre and use a comparison star close to it and if the flat fielding and dark subtraction is okay you will get good results.

    Of course DSLRs are a bit noisy, so combined with the use of a short xposure it can mean a lot of exposures are needed.

    in reply to: Fading Meteors #577176
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Silly question: is the sensor interlaced and was a dark frame subtraction applied?

    in reply to: Fading Meteors #577173
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    There goes that theory 🙂

    in reply to: Fading Meteors #577171
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Is the camera doing any running stacking of the images in the background?

    in reply to: Eclipse #577082
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    In Wiltshire, not far from Salisbury Plain, there were some tasteful high altitude wisps of cloud before the penumbral stages, but by the time the eclipse was underway they had mainly melted away leaving a clear, if not very transparent, sky.

    As the night went on and the temperature dropped to 3C some mist started to form, but this was mainly near watercourses. Pretty nearly ideal conditions.

    A dark eclipse with an orange tinge. If my blood looked that colour, I would see a doctor quick!

    I didnt think any colour was apparent until the umbral phases. Is that the general perception or is my colour vision poor?

    in reply to: SQL #577038
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I thought you meant databases there for a moment!

    Yep, I have used one, but the master must be Bob Mizon surely.

    in reply to: Far Side of the Moore #576822
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Isnt Dirk Maggs the guy who did the Radio adaption of Douglas Adams “Long Dark Teatime of the Soul” and the Pratchett/Gaiman “Good Omens”? Both are quite fun.

    Just remember its entertainment, not art or history.

     

    in reply to: Today’s solar eclipse #576815
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Deeply jealous of Nick’s Svalbard Valley shot. A nice picture in its own right – eclipse or not.

    in reply to: Today’s solar eclipse #576805
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Saw the forecast had a gap in the clouds forecast near Yeovil, so I drove there from Salisbury and it seemed to be about the same as at home – awful. So, as I was an hour from a friends house in Exeter I went on to there. Was down to 0.5 mile visibility in Monkton and some street lights were on in Exeter as I arrived. Gaps appeared as I sat in a traffic jam at eclipse maximum (aaargh). So I parked in the Co-Op car park, took some snaps and then went on to my friends home where we sat on his doorstep eating toast, drinking coffee and watching the eclipse through gaps in the cloud. Very civilised.

    Turned out that it cleared at home! So I could have saved myself driving the 170 mile round trip.

    Managed one decent image with the handheld compact camera from the Co-Op though…

     

     

    in reply to: 130pds #576732
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Hi there,

    Sorry to take so long to post.

    I had one of these for a review a while ago. Appeared in Astronomy Now I think. My memory of the equipment was that the tube was luggable, would go nicely on an HEQ5 and yielded good clean images. I liked it – though the focuser was only just adequate – and quite heavy.  It made a very affordable alternative to the hideously overpriced ED or triplet refractors that are unable to bring all the light to focus at one point, giving it an edge in creating luminance images.

    I think the PDS needs to be used with something like a Baader coma corrector when combined with a large CCD sensor, but there was minimal coma seen when imaging with a Starlight H18.

    Obviously, the secondary mirror supports generate diffraction spikes around bright stars, but brought up in the pre-SCT era I have no problem with that.

    I rather fancy a 300PDS. Would be okay on my EQ6 Pro. 🙂

     

     

Viewing 11 posts - 481 through 491 (of 491 total)