Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 480 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian probe lands safely near Moon’s South Pole #618838
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    No, I meant to rerun it leaving out every second frame to show the progress, but have never found the time. I have a plot of mag versus time somewhere too but that merely tells you that it was stable and not rotating fast. Though it did tell me it would be mag 29 at 1AU. 🙂

    in reply to: Indian probe lands safely near Moon’s South Pole #618835
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Nice achievement and the probe was quite easy to spot on the way out, though it was fun the night it was moving at 3 arcsecs/sec

    The image attached shows dozens of short exposures overlaid and processed to record the highest value for each pixel.

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Gyulbudaghian’s Nebula #618717
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Interesting to see that PV Cep really is recovering after a brief drop in brightness to nearly 18th mag in June.

    It would be nice to see another outburst in the nebula. Certainly looking hopeful.

    Now if McNeil’s would come back again too, that would set us up for a very nice winter.

    in reply to: Field flattener for CMOS photometry #618663
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I don’t see why not – but am happy to be corrected if I am wrong.

    I use a coma corrector on my telescope and do photometry.

    Just be sure to always do dark subtraction and flat fielding.

    in reply to: Lodestar control using Rpi #618534
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I wanted to write my own code for controlling the camera without carrying along the huge baggage of filter wheels, dome control, mounts, derotators etc that will never be used.

    As I have written code previously for the cameras to run under VB6 I hoped it wouldn’t be stupidly difficult.

    With the RPi, I have found the problem to be that I do not have drivers for the SX cameras. I made it so the RPi recognises my Lodestar camera when it is plugged in, but it doesn’t have a driver to associate.

    Previously, I went looking for the EKOS source on github and when I searched for the phrases “Starlight” or “sx” I found nothing. Having, accidentally, missed the introduction of github I must admit to some confusion/uncertainty as to how it works but didn’t seem able to find anything about the SX cameras. Must get a “Github for Dummies” book sometime.

    Prompted by you I have now again looked at the Indi site and this time spotted that the cpp driver code appears to be available at http://svn.code.sf.net/p/indi/code/trunk/3rdparty/indi-sx/
    I will download it all shortly.

    I shall have a play. Not quite sure how it will go, as its 20 years since I did C++ in anger, so it should be an interesting learning experience. There may be bad language at some point. Hopefully, I can eventually tie it all into Python / QT.

    If anyone has already gone this route. Any “lessons learned” would be welcome.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618269
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I measured it at mag 15.0 and a couple of arc minutes out of position. Think it was doing 47 arc secs / minute. Had not realised it would be so bright.

    It will get harder once they stop the orbits and head for the Moon.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618166
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I processed last nights data and got magnitudes of between 13.8-14.0 (Gaia g unfiltered) with a 0.12 mag spread – which is okay given it was initially viewed through a hedge and very low. Position errors were within the seeing disk.

    Give it was moving at ~300 arc secs/min I used either 1s or 0.6s exposures. I think that was near perigee. It looks rather slower tonight.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618154
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Its clear tonight so, after 90mins on Gyulbudaghian’s, I had a bash with the 300mm Newtonian. Hadn’t noticed how fast Chandrayaan-3 was predicted to be moving. 4 arc secs per second…

    Got it in 1 sec exposures. Will work out a magnitude tomorrow.First observations were through a hedge which really did not help.

    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Euclid now appears on the JPL Horizons system!

    Unfortunately, its bucketing down out there…

    in reply to: BAA Journal – have your say #617912
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Ah, had not realised that.

    So it could have more pages or it could change its content or both could happen!

    I know what I would prefer but this isn’t the place for that discussion.

    in reply to: BAA Journal – have your say #617891
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    That is extended in the number of pages it contains, rather than extended in the range of material included isn’t it?

    in reply to: The JANUS camera on JUICE #617775
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    And what have the Romans ever done for us?

    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thats an interesting read and pretty much correlates with what I heard from an academic earlier this year.

    Looks like current darks are important and for aesthetic purposes a median smooth may help some of the noise that doesn’t respond to sigma clipping – on account of not being from a Normal distribution.

    It does make the QHY600 a very attractive prospect.

    Nice to see CMOS has finally (nearly) caught up with CCDs. I first remember hearing of them from a friend in the mid 90s – the noise characteristics then were hideous.

    Of course a 123MB image is a little worrying. I might need a 2TB drive a bit sharpish, if I bought one of those.

    in reply to: Newtonian Focusers #617598
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yes, I did look at the SX Mini wheel but it doesn’t accept 2″ filters and weighs pretty much the same as the Midi anyway – 800gms or thereabouts.

    The Trius 694 clocks in at 450gm. I doubt if the Lodestar guider makes much difference.

    So the whole thing is a decent weight – which seems a lot at the end of a thin Newtonian tube. 🙂

    I will try tightening the central screw by tiny amounts every evening and see how it gets on.

    BTW the Midi wheel can take 2″ filters – it has two wheel options.

    in reply to: Dark Sky Plan #617209
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Our local sports field expressed a desire to be dark sky / wildlife friendly when they replaced their halogen tennis court lights. Unfortunately, the difference in quote for less blue lights made them unaffordable for a small sports club/charity. At least they tried.

    However, it looks like the fitters are not aware of the idea of light spill and the field next door is illuminated directly over 400m away… Bizarre.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #617000
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I am imaging JUICE at the moment and after stacking 5x 60s frames (aligned on the star field) I could see a hint of the track. As its a hazy night, that sounds like the bright end of 18th mag. Will do some proper sums tomorrow and post the picture.

    Tonight it is 1.4 million miles away.

    Time to break out Tycho tracker I think. Will be interested to see how far we can push things.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616939
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Just processed my results from last night. JUICE was at mag 17.3 using an unfiltered Trius 694 and Gaia g comparisons.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616926
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    JUICE was SNR=15 in 30s exposures this evening – must get the OAG going again.

    Have never really checked. Managed 20.4 with the 10″. Got a Z=5 QSO but the unfiltered mag of that was uncertain as a lot of the light was shifted into the red – am guessing mag 20.8. Suspect that on a good clear night with a high target and no Moon I am looking at 21. Would need to be an interesting target. 🙂

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616923
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    just did a quick unfiltered imaging estimate of the magnitude of JUICE around midnight 17/18th April and get 16.3 with a fairly steady value and a position that agrees with JPL Horizon at the <1 arc sec level.

    Will try again tonight…

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616918
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I can’t imagine what you mean. 🙂

    I never quite established what it was the Avast had done, but it lost contact the moment it started its update. Took me 2 evenings to coax it back to life – worked fine via keyboard, but refused to talk over Wifi. Fine now…

    I think its fortunate that I attended a failing North London comprehensive in the 1970s. It equipped me with the robust language skills I needed to properly describe exactly what I thought about the staff at Avast, the authors of Windows 10 and life, the universe and everything.

    Lets just say …. I was somewhat vexed.

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 480 total)