Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 506 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Payload #619700
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I suspect you may need to make a metal base to mount the OTAs on and then bolt that on to the Versa Plate. You may need some balance arms to help balance if you change cameras or filter wheels or autoguider. Its doable though. Probably up to 14″ OTAs – perhaps a RASA and C14.

    in reply to: AstroImageJ and plate solved images #619223
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I just ran the platesolving code with the astrometry.net –verify option fully implemented against a set of T Tauri data I collected last night and am getting a smaller positional error and 50% more stars to be used when estimating Zp.

    Looks worth doing.

    Must admit I only look at the forum when I have some specific problem in mind.

    in reply to: AstroImageJ and plate solved images #619211
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I currently use the 4100 and 5200H files as they give a V or Gaia g mag (I work unfiltered) and it allows the colours index of each star to be assessed.

    One interesting thing to try is the Astrometry.Net –verify option. Got it going at the weekend (I use FITS bintables to identify star locations via columns of x, y, flux). Improves the number of stars employed in WCS polynomial generation (smaller median errors) and also helps Zp estimation. A useful refinement I think.

    in reply to: AstroImageJ and plate solved images #619208
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Ah, yes. I remember ansvr. Its a cygwin thing isn’t it? Surprised the guy who did the conversion job has not updated it Apparently, the absence of a true Windows version is due to the way AN maps the Index files to memory.

    I was forced over to WSL (or Linux on a Rpi) because the ansvr version of AN is quite old and it was failing to solve some sparsely populated fields, while the latest AN did.

    Ansvr certainly worked okay most the time though.

    in reply to: AstroImageJ and plate solved images #619205
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Hi Robin. Just being nosey. Is the astrometry.net instance under WSL2 or cygwin or are you running Linux?

    in reply to: C/2023 P1 #619179
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    By coincidence? 🙂

    in reply to: Indian probe lands safely near Moon’s South Pole #618838
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    No, I meant to rerun it leaving out every second frame to show the progress, but have never found the time. I have a plot of mag versus time somewhere too but that merely tells you that it was stable and not rotating fast. Though it did tell me it would be mag 29 at 1AU. 🙂

    in reply to: Indian probe lands safely near Moon’s South Pole #618835
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Nice achievement and the probe was quite easy to spot on the way out, though it was fun the night it was moving at 3 arcsecs/sec

    The image attached shows dozens of short exposures overlaid and processed to record the highest value for each pixel.

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Gyulbudaghian’s Nebula #618717
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Interesting to see that PV Cep really is recovering after a brief drop in brightness to nearly 18th mag in June.

    It would be nice to see another outburst in the nebula. Certainly looking hopeful.

    Now if McNeil’s would come back again too, that would set us up for a very nice winter.

    in reply to: Field flattener for CMOS photometry #618663
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I don’t see why not – but am happy to be corrected if I am wrong.

    I use a coma corrector on my telescope and do photometry.

    Just be sure to always do dark subtraction and flat fielding.

    in reply to: Lodestar control using Rpi #618534
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I wanted to write my own code for controlling the camera without carrying along the huge baggage of filter wheels, dome control, mounts, derotators etc that will never be used.

    As I have written code previously for the cameras to run under VB6 I hoped it wouldn’t be stupidly difficult.

    With the RPi, I have found the problem to be that I do not have drivers for the SX cameras. I made it so the RPi recognises my Lodestar camera when it is plugged in, but it doesn’t have a driver to associate.

    Previously, I went looking for the EKOS source on github and when I searched for the phrases “Starlight” or “sx” I found nothing. Having, accidentally, missed the introduction of github I must admit to some confusion/uncertainty as to how it works but didn’t seem able to find anything about the SX cameras. Must get a “Github for Dummies” book sometime.

    Prompted by you I have now again looked at the Indi site and this time spotted that the cpp driver code appears to be available at http://svn.code.sf.net/p/indi/code/trunk/3rdparty/indi-sx/
    I will download it all shortly.

    I shall have a play. Not quite sure how it will go, as its 20 years since I did C++ in anger, so it should be an interesting learning experience. There may be bad language at some point. Hopefully, I can eventually tie it all into Python / QT.

    If anyone has already gone this route. Any “lessons learned” would be welcome.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618269
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I measured it at mag 15.0 and a couple of arc minutes out of position. Think it was doing 47 arc secs / minute. Had not realised it would be so bright.

    It will get harder once they stop the orbits and head for the Moon.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618166
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I processed last nights data and got magnitudes of between 13.8-14.0 (Gaia g unfiltered) with a 0.12 mag spread – which is okay given it was initially viewed through a hedge and very low. Position errors were within the seeing disk.

    Give it was moving at ~300 arc secs/min I used either 1s or 0.6s exposures. I think that was near perigee. It looks rather slower tonight.

    in reply to: Chandrayaan-3 on its way to the Moon #618154
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Its clear tonight so, after 90mins on Gyulbudaghian’s, I had a bash with the 300mm Newtonian. Hadn’t noticed how fast Chandrayaan-3 was predicted to be moving. 4 arc secs per second…

    Got it in 1 sec exposures. Will work out a magnitude tomorrow.First observations were through a hedge which really did not help.

    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Euclid now appears on the JPL Horizons system!

    Unfortunately, its bucketing down out there…

    in reply to: BAA Journal – have your say #617912
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Ah, had not realised that.

    So it could have more pages or it could change its content or both could happen!

    I know what I would prefer but this isn’t the place for that discussion.

    in reply to: BAA Journal – have your say #617891
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    That is extended in the number of pages it contains, rather than extended in the range of material included isn’t it?

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Grant Privett.
    in reply to: The JANUS camera on JUICE #617775
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    And what have the Romans ever done for us?

    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thats an interesting read and pretty much correlates with what I heard from an academic earlier this year.

    Looks like current darks are important and for aesthetic purposes a median smooth may help some of the noise that doesn’t respond to sigma clipping – on account of not being from a Normal distribution.

    It does make the QHY600 a very attractive prospect.

    Nice to see CMOS has finally (nearly) caught up with CCDs. I first remember hearing of them from a friend in the mid 90s – the noise characteristics then were hideous.

    Of course a 123MB image is a little worrying. I might need a 2TB drive a bit sharpish, if I bought one of those.

    in reply to: Newtonian Focusers #617598
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yes, I did look at the SX Mini wheel but it doesn’t accept 2″ filters and weighs pretty much the same as the Midi anyway – 800gms or thereabouts.

    The Trius 694 clocks in at 450gm. I doubt if the Lodestar guider makes much difference.

    So the whole thing is a decent weight – which seems a lot at the end of a thin Newtonian tube. 🙂

    I will try tightening the central screw by tiny amounts every evening and see how it gets on.

    BTW the Midi wheel can take 2″ filters – it has two wheel options.

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 506 total)