Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 121 through 140 (of 506 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dark Sky Plan #617209
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Our local sports field expressed a desire to be dark sky / wildlife friendly when they replaced their halogen tennis court lights. Unfortunately, the difference in quote for less blue lights made them unaffordable for a small sports club/charity. At least they tried.

    However, it looks like the fitters are not aware of the idea of light spill and the field next door is illuminated directly over 400m away… Bizarre.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #617000
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I am imaging JUICE at the moment and after stacking 5x 60s frames (aligned on the star field) I could see a hint of the track. As its a hazy night, that sounds like the bright end of 18th mag. Will do some proper sums tomorrow and post the picture.

    Tonight it is 1.4 million miles away.

    Time to break out Tycho tracker I think. Will be interested to see how far we can push things.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616939
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Just processed my results from last night. JUICE was at mag 17.3 using an unfiltered Trius 694 and Gaia g comparisons.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616926
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    JUICE was SNR=15 in 30s exposures this evening – must get the OAG going again.

    Have never really checked. Managed 20.4 with the 10″. Got a Z=5 QSO but the unfiltered mag of that was uncertain as a lot of the light was shifted into the red – am guessing mag 20.8. Suspect that on a good clear night with a high target and no Moon I am looking at 21. Would need to be an interesting target. 🙂

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616923
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    just did a quick unfiltered imaging estimate of the magnitude of JUICE around midnight 17/18th April and get 16.3 with a fairly steady value and a position that agrees with JPL Horizon at the <1 arc sec level.

    Will try again tonight…

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616918
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I can’t imagine what you mean. 🙂

    I never quite established what it was the Avast had done, but it lost contact the moment it started its update. Took me 2 evenings to coax it back to life – worked fine via keyboard, but refused to talk over Wifi. Fine now…

    I think its fortunate that I attended a failing North London comprehensive in the 1970s. It equipped me with the robust language skills I needed to properly describe exactly what I thought about the staff at Avast, the authors of Windows 10 and life, the universe and everything.

    Lets just say …. I was somewhat vexed.

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616889
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Were it not for an Avast antivirus software update knackering – in a very subtle manner – the ability of the observatory PC to talk to the house, I would have been imaging at the same time as you – before the mist started rolling in about 12:30. Looking at my post meridian flip image sequence, the stars are gradually fading as the transparency went to pot.

    Will measure some brightness values later…

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616868
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Currently looking at the location suggested by JPL Horizons and am really surprised by how bright this thing is for something man made half a million miles away.

    And thats under murky conditions. Image at https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20230418_002705_da18d9fe717fc9b0

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616862
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Nice one!

    here it was cloudy one night, then I had an equipment failure the next… Might have another clear night in time for the first flyby. 🙂

    in reply to: JUICE launch #616849
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Separation of the Juice spacecraft from its launch vehicle was confirmed a few minutes ago. Its on the way!

    Something to look forward to imaging – if it clears tonight.

    in reply to: Using ASTAP for comet measurements #616844
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Yes, I could make the code look for the TheSkyX COM process running and try to interrogate it for what the current pointing is, catching an error if need be. I have never bothered as I usually take many dozens of images of the same target and use a platesolving script that feeds the RA/Dec coordinates of the previous frame solved into an astrometry.NET instance. Upshot is that solving the first frame is slow, but the later frames solve in a second or two (depending on how many cores I use).

    Worth thinking about – after I make the code rattle through the filters….

    in reply to: Using ASTAP for comet measurements #616838
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I just had a quick look at the ASTAP manual.

    If I am reading it right, then ASTAP needs two FITS keywords* populated with the approximate field centre coordinates in RA/Dec and also guidance from the user (field diameter/search size) to run. So, its not doing blind solving, but the much simpler user assisted solving. Which probably explains the speed.

    I’m not sure though how most of us would get the RA/Dec values into the header. Is there a command line tool or something available? I imagine you could supply a target name and the software then use Simbad or JPL Horizons online to supply the current position from your lat/long.

    Does anyone know of such a tool? That would be extremely useful – and not too hard to write in Python.

    Certainly, I control my telescope via TheSkyX, but I don’t like its imaging interface and so use my own CCD control software (or sometimes AstroArt) – which just takes images and does not talk to the mount. I imagine others may also be in the position of generating FITS from their camera without RA/Dec coordinates in.

    *Or possibly 4, as I have seen two different definitions of keywords for RA/Dec.

    in reply to: Using ASTAP for comet measurements #616724
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thats interesting. Glad to hear its still being developed.

    Not sure a large circular aperture is always what you want for a comet, but its certainly a start.

    in reply to: Use of Non-Technical Units in astronomy #616713
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Oh hell. That ages me. I watched it on TV.

    in reply to: Using ASTAP for comet measurements #616711
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Are you sure about that? For extended objects?

    I’m probably a year out of date here, but it used to work on asteroids and other point or near point sources.

    in reply to: Game changer in PixInsight #616660
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Interesting.

    As you say it brings out some nice detail in the dark bands and centre of the galaxy. Was surprised to see that in the top left part of the image some of the detail seemed to be blurred out. Would be interested to see what it did with something like the Rosette.

    in reply to: Use of Non-Technical Units in astronomy #616650
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Ah, but is that Chlamyphoridae or Dasypodidae? These are important details.

    You could also express it as the time an unladen swallow might take to fly it and then you would have to ask, european or african?

    in reply to: Use of Non-Technical Units in astronomy #616433
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thats inspired. Someone at the Jerusalem Post is very bored and having fun.

    I’m looking forward to mass being expressed in terms of Tesla batteries or volume in terms of St Paul’s Cathedral.

    in reply to: Evening Stars #616050
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    The night of closest approach was largely cloudy here, besides which, I was stuck in Tesco’s car park for most the evening with a broken own car.

    Did manage to get something on the 2nd though. https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20230303_232508_33211f79b6b09cc1

    Ideal conditions but the 1C air temp combined with wind made my hands pretty cold by the end. I think the moonlight greatly improved on what I would have achieved with flash units.

    in reply to: Suck or blow #615689
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    In the spirit of full disclosure…. 🙂

    Was -7.2C here last night (still -3.2C by 9:15) with a very heavy hoarfrost/fog in the early hours.

    Looked in dome at 11:00 – by which time the air was registering as +5C – and found some condensation on the mirror.

    Well , there goes my theory….

    So, henceforth will also use a dew heater band near the secondary plus the fan. Can’t help matters having frost on the inside of the tube some nights. Don’t want to use too much power though.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by Grant Privett.
Viewing 20 posts - 121 through 140 (of 506 total)