Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 480 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Partial solar eclipse of 2022 October 25 #613063
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Seems to be working. Looks like thin cloud presently.

    There are a couple of small dust patches – as you said – but nothing thats going to detract from a good chunk of the Sun being obscured…

    in reply to: DART spacecraft impact with Dimorphos #612729
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    It was fun to watch and some of those observing from the ground did quite well too…

    https://twitter.com/fallingstarIfA/status/1574583529731670021?s=20&t=bSNlZJgGJmZCFPEEcFqEvA

    3 tonnes of TNT appears to have made a pretty impressive cloud of debris.

    in reply to: Expensive book #612396
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Yep. Dangerous talk as it disagreed with Aristotle AND Scripture!

    Galileo got house arrest for more than a decade and banned from publishing…

    in reply to: Artemis #612188
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    That sounds very hopeful. Would love to see the burn…

    Of course that means overcast skies plus fog for the next couple of weeks then. 🙂

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by Grant Privett.
    in reply to: Artemis #612156
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    At -27 theres not much hope from home for me then as my dome blocks everything below -10 and a nearby hill blocks everything below -15.

    Damn.

    in reply to: Antitwilight Sky #612038
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Cloud tends to be below you when you are at 2400m high. 🙂

    in reply to: Antitwilight Sky #612011
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    After seeing the pictures from Giovanni, I dug out an old picture….

    https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20220818_202738_4a8c0021466584a7

    in reply to: Artemis #612007
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Ah, excellent. I looked and they appear to have a place holder object name in place, so it looks hopeful.

    It could be a lot of fun. It looks like it will be taking a while to get there.

    in reply to: Antitwilight Sky #611998
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Lovely images. The Belt of Venus is rather beautiful.

    I only see it occasionally in the UK. Does it require particularly transparent skies to appear?

    in reply to: Phew, that’s a relief! #611656
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I’m sure the Chinese space station will provide other opportunities for hiding under the table.

    in reply to: NASA Book on NEOs (free) #611655
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks for the headsup. It looks a really good read.

    in reply to: PR Her #610125
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    On 25minutes worth of frames I am seeing something very dim and (on my frame) at the 7 o’clock position from the 15.7 mag star, but that seems slightly out of position compared to the AAVSO chart. Is that it?

    in reply to: PR Her #610120
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Gary,

    I’m on target now and not seeing it – unless its very, very close to the 15.7 star and the two appear merged.

    Could it have faded already?

    Grant

    EDIT: Image attached. Pixel=1.54″ so field ~25arc min wide.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Grant Privett.
    in reply to: BAA Telescope Time? #609300
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks for clarifying.

    in reply to: BAA Telescope Time? #609298
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Hi Andy,

    Yes, I can imagine everyone would think “Wow! Thats a great opportunity.”, but surely before engaging programmers there must have been some vague plan for how that time would be used?

    Not meaning to be awkward, but I’m curious as to what the Council thinking was. 🙂 There is obviously quite a range of possibilities.

    Grant

    in reply to: BAA Telescope Time? #609249
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Hi Callum,

    Oh yes, now you mention it I think I recall seeing that once before. So, that would be used in some way for scheduling one imagines, but scheduling what?

    Is the BAA thinking of buying telescope time from a commercial site, buying footprint at a managed facility and setting up their own scope or buying a BAA defined system to be run at the site in question. What sort of operating model are they thinking of?

    Similarly, is this intended purely as a recruitment carrot to dangle or would it (if a BAA system) also be available for the sections so its output every year did not consist of entirely of another 2000 narrowband images of M42, M31 and M45.

    Grant

    in reply to: New website feedback #609195
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks to all for their hard work.

    I imagine someone else has said it, but I would prefer the Forum and Tutorial sections swapped places on the front page.

    The Forum I look at everyday, the Tutorials once in a blue moon.

    Is Tutorials at the top to help attract new members?

    in reply to: Ron Arbour #608661
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    A hugely skilled astronomer, a discoverer of supernovae, a telescope maker and an innovator.

    A nice man who was generous with his time, fun to be with and happy to help others out.

    More importantly than all that, Pat’s husband.

    I’m glad I was lucky enough to know him.

    in reply to: New website feedback #608126
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Silly and unimportant comments….

    Is it possible to force carriage returns in the Observer Profile? Do I need to put in the appropriate html?

    Also, on the discussions, is it possible to have a link to the last post or most recent unread post or is that not possible within the new framework?

    Like the dark mode….

    in reply to: New website feedback #608088
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Silly suggestion: could the “Observe” button connect with Sky Notes instead?

Viewing 20 posts - 141 through 160 (of 480 total)