Nick James

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 861 through 880 (of 888 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BAA Summer meeting on July 12 #576605
    Nick James
    Participant

    If anyone has any good photos or video clips from Saturday and would be willing to (potentially) have them included in the meeting video please send them to me on ndj@nickdjames.com.

    It would be good to see a few thumbnails posted here too. I’ll start the ball rolling with the attached.

    Nick.

     

    in reply to: BAA Summer meeting on July 12 #576602
    Nick James
    Participant

    Alex,

    The audio and slides are loaded on my PC so the recording should be up on the site in the next few weeks or so. All the talks were very good but Allan’s stood out as he put Patrick’s life in the context of other astronomy popularisers of the past. He also did a good job of putting some of Patrick’s taller stories in context. Patrick was in a good company since apparently Galileo and Newton did the same thing…

    Nick.

    in reply to: The Great Comet of 1680 #576594
    Nick James
    Participant

    Those were the days when comets were real comets not the puny little fuzzballs that we have to put up with now!

    in reply to: NLC Season 2014 #576590
    Nick James
    Participant

    Here’s a direct link to the Youtube Vid that Bill mentions. Nice NLC. I haven’t seen any myself so far this year.

    Nick.

    Nick James
    Participant

    Jeremy, the chart link in your posting doesn’t work although I can guess what it should be….

    Nick.

    in reply to: Variable Nebula Update #576572
    Nick James
    Participant

    Mike,

    Very nice image and that is one hell of a telescope but it certainly burns through the points! I’m planning to have a go at this object during the Webb Society meeting in a few weeks time.

    Nick

    in reply to: M27 #576567
    Nick James
    Participant

    Hi Cameron,

    Very nice image. I observe from a light polluted site too and it can be a challenge but modern imaging equipment can do a lot even from very bright sites. Feel free to post some more images on this forum when you’re ready and if you have any questions please ask.

    Nick.

    in reply to: Supernova in M106 #576562
    Nick James
    Participant

    This is confirmed as a SN, designation is SN 2014bc.

    in reply to: Supernova in M106 #576561
    Nick James
    Participant

    Gary,

    Here’s an image from tonight. I assume the SN is the brightish thing around 3 arcsec SE of the core but it is difficult to separate it from the core and I don’t have any comparison pics to check.

    Nick.

    in reply to: The 2014 Camelopardalid meteor shower #576560
    Nick James
    Participant

    Alex,

    There’s a good summary of the prospects for this shower by Rob McNaught here. This is an updated version of the presentation given at the recent The Astronomer meeting. David Asher also has a very good summary on his page here.

    There are some images of the parent comet (a real pygmy) in the BAA comet archive here.

    Nick.

    in reply to: Dudley Fuller (1929-2014) #576556
    Nick James
    Participant

    That is sad news. Dud was certainly a great character and great entertainment. His Fullerscopes telescopes really looked the part too. I had a 12-inch Newtonian on a MkIV mount for many years and it did a pretty good job although some of the mechanical engineering was novel. That was never Fullerscopes’ strong point. I also used the 18″ f/7 at Charterhouse, Somerset when I was a lad. It looked very impressive in the 1975 Handbook photo shown below and was even more impressive close up although it was a brute to use and I think Jeremy Shears had broken it before I got there…

    Nick.

     

    in reply to: spectrum of sn2014AS (was PSN J14005449+4058596) #576551
    Nick James
    Participant

    Thanks Robin. Both very useful sites. Nick.

    in reply to: spectrum of sn2014AS (was PSN J14005449+4058596) #576548
    Nick James
    Participant

    Robin,

    Getting a spectrum with that dispersion of an object that faint is very impressive stuff. Do you know if there is a central database of amateur spectra anywhere?

    Nick.

    in reply to: Milton Keynes meeting #576547
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, a very good meeting, well attended at an excellent venue with a nice lunch too. Thanks to everyone involved in the organisation. I’ve got recordings of the talks and the speakers’ slides so I’ll upload these soonish so that those who were not there can get a flavour of the event. In the meantime here are a couple of photos from the event.

    Prof Andrew Norton talking about Gamma Ray Bursts

     

    The OU Meade 16-inch in a Norman Walker floating dome

    in reply to: Handbook cover picture #576535
    Nick James
    Participant

    Hi Sheridan,

    I don’t currently have any suggestions for covers but referring to Pluto as a “minor planet” is likely to get the “Pluto is a planet” supporters rather upset. It is officially a “dwarf planet” although, to me, it is just a giant, dormant, comet nucleus…

    Nick.

    in reply to: New Arrival #576534
    Nick James
    Participant

    Yes, welcome to the BAA. As Jeremy says the VSS are a very active section and they will be able to provide a lot of help and guidance with regard to variable star observing. There are lots of other sections too so have a browse around the site to see what you are interested in. Also, since you are in Walton access to London is fairly easy so come along to one of our main meetings if you can.  We also have a meeting next weekend in Milton Keynes which is themed around stars. If you do make it to a meeting search me out and say hello.

    Nick.

    in reply to: Winchester 2014 #576528
    Nick James
    Participant

    Indeed. An excellent weekend all round and I would definitely encourage people to come along. It’s a great opportunity to see excellent talks in a rural environment with very good food and plenty of time to discuss astronomy (and many other things) in the bar afterwards. All the talks were excellent but Gerry Gilmore’s talk on Gaia was outstanding and an absolute model of how to do it. You need to get your booking in early though since spaces are always limited.

    Nick.

    Nick James
    Participant

    Hi James,

    There has been a lot of discussion about this and it is pretty unlikely that this is a meteorite. The Minor Planets Mailing List discussion on this is worth reading. You can find it here.

    Nick.

    in reply to: TLE on April 15th #576515
    Nick James
    Participant

    Paul,

    Unfortunately not. According to the Handbook, page 10, the penumbral phase starts at 04:53 just as the moon is setting so I suppose it is possible that observers with a very clear western horizon might see some effects but it will be a difficult observation. The next TLE is October 8th (Handbook page 12) and we don’t get to see any of that either!

    Nick.

    in reply to: Removing M82 from SN 2014J #576514
    Nick James
    Participant

    I’m not sure it’s right for me to comment on my own comments but here’s my V band lightcurve with and without the galaxy subtracted. It is clear that the subtraction makes a significant difference now and this will only become more important as the SN fades.

Viewing 20 posts - 861 through 880 (of 888 total)