David Swan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 307 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Christmas meeting videos #578843
    David Swan
    Participant

    Thanks Nick. According to the Beeb, the Hawaiian name for 1I/2017 U1 is pronounced oh MOO-uh MOO-uh.

    in reply to: SN2017igf in NGC 3901 #578788
    David Swan
    Participant

    I’ve just solved the image in Astrometrica. The software also dabbles in photometry: the estimate is 15.1 CV (unfiltered CCD with V mag zeropoint).

    in reply to: SN2017igf in NGC 3901 #578785
    David Swan
    Participant

    Hello,

    I noticed a clear patch when putting the bin out and got 45 x 5s frames. Here’s an image. It does seem bright! Midpoint 21/11/2017 2015 UT.

    in reply to: SN2017igf in NGC 3901 #578784
    David Swan
    Participant

    Yes, congrats Robin. The galaxy is nicely positioned, so – weather permitting – I’ll try and get some images over the next week for magnitude estimations. David

    in reply to: C/2017 T1 #578739
    David Swan
    Participant

    Thanks Nick. The software looks really useful. I noted there was a long smudge just below as well, so it does make one a bit doubtful! I’ll try to get multiple stacks as you suggest, and then blink them. David

    in reply to: C/2017 T1 #578732
    David Swan
    Participant

    Certainly not a striking image, but I might just have picked up Heinze above the sky background. Please see the FITS here

    https://1drv.ms/u/s!Agvxu8wNOxpAcJ2l_8CiGRTPXrc

    and give me your opinion. The midpoint of the capture was 050649 UT on 8 Nov 2017.

    in reply to: Auroral light pollution #578729
    David Swan
    Participant

    Quite. Perhaps, Robin, you should reveal to Eric Watkins where in the UK this astro-friendly micro-climate exists. David 

    in reply to: possible gravitational microlensing event #578709
    David Swan
    Participant

    Thanks for flagging this Robin. I can’t do spec, but I do have B, G and R CCD filters – so if the object is bright enough for my setup, I’ll take a set of images. David

    in reply to: comet 96p In the SOHO LASCO3 FIELD #578685
    David Swan
    Participant

    What a fantastic image. Thanks for pointing this out.

    in reply to: Animated gifs #578656
    David Swan
    Participant

    Hello everyone. I would like to second Martin Lewis’ question / request for this functionality. If it isn’t too much trouble – I don’t know what would be required ‘under the hood’ of the website. David

    in reply to: PSN at2017gjn in NGC1067 confirmed using ALPY 200 #578604
    David Swan
    Participant

    Image now visible via Rochester SNimages site. Carried out photometry and checked it – magnitude came out brighter than I judged by eye, at 13.6. Would be good to image this target again. Perhaps Thu. David

    in reply to: PSN at2017gjn in NGC1067 confirmed using ALPY 200 #578597
    David Swan
    Participant

    I’d be happy to submit my image and magnitude estimation (CCD, clear filter). I gather you have to go through VSnet to get your obs on the Rochester site, so I’ve sent a request to be added to the system. I’ve set a median stacking job going on my laptop during my lunchbreak – I can then use the Aperture Photometry Tool on that image to get a more accurate determination of the SN magnitude, using a couple of comparison stars.

    in reply to: PSN at2017gjn in NGC1067 confirmed using ALPY 200 #578595
    David Swan
    Participant

    I follow your spectroscopy with interest, Robin. I’ve just imaged the SN – the stacked image is on my observing page. Very bright – guesstimate mag 14, when compared with Gaia 1564852608241033472. The SN is clearly visible on individual frames; I will keep lights and darks in case anyone wants them for photometry. Best wishes – David

    in reply to: Astronomer or not? #578526
    David Swan
    Participant

    Nothing is better than ‘space-walk’ viewing of globulars, open clusters and bright nebulae through a long focal length, wide AFOV, eyepiece. I think both the ease of acquiring images nowadays (cost, expertise required) and also of sharing them has led to the perception that visual observing and freezing to death at the telescope is over. I don’t think that is the case, in terms of absolute numbers of people. I just think there are many more different types of activity going on – and it’s all good as far as I am concerned! I do a lot of visual observing, and keep a log, but I don’t broadcast it. (My sketches are terrible; Paul Abel’s are amazing.) David

    in reply to: Nasa shows Crusader Castle on Mars, or not. #578493
    David Swan
    Participant

    It does indeed look like a low-lying castle on the right. I confess I was not familiar with the Crusader type, but I’ve now looked it up. Bamburgh is not too far from where I live, and to follow up from Andrew, that image could be north Northumberland on a poor summer day. LOL. David

    in reply to: Monday 21 “Eclipse Day” #578486
    David Swan
    Participant

    Watching the BBC News footage from Kentucky, 1925 our time. Clear prominences visible at the 2 30, 4 and 6 o’clock positions on the solar disc.

    in reply to: Monday 21 “Eclipse Day” #578483
    David Swan
    Participant

    I’ll be watching too!

    in reply to: Artificial satellite Mayak #578431
    David Swan
    Participant

    Thanks Lars. My Russian is rather flaky 😉 , so please find a Google translation attached.

    in reply to: What is this? #578425
    David Swan
    Participant

    I would guess this is an attachment to facilitate afocal photography? The two eyepiece clamps are placed differently with respect to the camera screw to allow different set-ups.

    in reply to: Interpreting star charts and images #578405
    David Swan
    Participant

    Cheers James: good image stretching. And thanks all.

    Let’s hope August gives us good astro weather, with a large high pressure area stuck over the UK affording clear skies and still air. LOL. David

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 307 total)