Duncan Hale-Sutton

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wow! What an auroral display! #622919
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Not as good as the display that Premier Inn mounts

    Excellent!

    in reply to: Wow! What an auroral display! #622849
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks for all your interesting comments and great pictures. One thing I wanted to comment on was how the display changed over perhaps 30 to 40 minutes. Initially I could see the usual green arc with some rays in it. Then it appeared to me that the arc swelled and moved southwards. This After this we began to see the larger and more colourful red/pink/purple rays and eventually Corona.

    What are we seeing here? Is the auroral oval moving south as time progresses. Are the rays that we see overhead, the same rays seen in the green arc earlier? Is it because the oval has swept over our heads and the transition from green to red/pink/purple is just an effect of viewing angle? What do the experts say?

    in reply to: BAA song #621307
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Yes, definitely resurrect it. Brilliant!

    in reply to: Help needed with VSS database entry #621040
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Great, thank you both. That makes sense. I will make the adjustment and resubmit. Duncan.

    in reply to: Scrapping Honorary Membership ! #620888
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    We should indeed be making it more affordable for young people to join. In fact I wrote to the President at the time to suggestion a lower rate for young people, but it was many years before it came to pass. Which is why I proposed a motion at the 2023 SGM, seconded by Nick James, not to increase the young person’s membership rate (as reported in the current Journal).

    I was present at 2023 SGM when we voted not to increase the young person’s membership rate and I thought that this was a good thing at the time. Now with the proposed changes to the by-laws we, as membership, will not be able to do this and it is something that also worries me. I know that often not many people turn up to vote at these SGMs but I am sure if a rate change was contentious enough people would attend.

    As far as honorary memberships go it seem to me that it looks a bit like fiddling at the edges of a bigger problem to do with the future survival of the BAA. Unless it becomes a financial burden I don’t see that this should be changed out of hand just because it appears as low hanging fruit. Perhaps the BAA needs to face up to larger structural problems. What is the major issue at stake? Is it that it can’t survive longterm on the money it raises through membership? Is it that membership will eventually decline because of its age profile? Is it that it is becoming too large to manage all the things it currently does?

    in reply to: Return of a “lost” meteor shower #620440
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    I went out at about 11.30pm last night as the fog had lifted but I can confirm that I didn’t see a single meteor during the 20 mins or so that I stood in the garden. The moon was well up by then which may have hidden fainter ones. I also went out Friday night for about half an hour around 7pm but I only saw one sporadic.

    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Actually it looked like it peaked at 19:00 UT.

    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    I am slightly at a loss to understand why there hasn’t been much comment on here from the Aurora section about what we saw on Sunday night. From what I have read STEVEs are a relatively new phenomenon which haven’t been well observed and aren’t well understood. I have seen people say that they are difficult to see, but this one wasn’t. It was as clear as a bell and wasn’t limited to either the east or west horizon. It went in a clear arc from the eastern horizon to the western horizon in a continuous band. What is more, each termination at the horizon was associated with a red display of auroral (?) light both east and west. Added to this it appeared to flow from east to west (and never the reverse) with bands moving along its arc. I was surprised that my pictures on the gallery seemed to generate little interest. I uploaded them pretty much as they came out of the camera so the scientific value of them wouldn’t be lost by making alterations.

    in reply to: Fantastic auroral display happening now (19:00 UT 5th Nov) #620016
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant
    in reply to: Fantastic auroral display happening now (19:00 UT 5th Nov) #620015
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    My latest post has disappeared again due to over editing!! What a nuisance. What I said was that thanks to Grant I think this white arc was a STEVE. I made the point that the red glow in the east to the right of the arc was mirrored in the west by a similar red glow (an aurora?). Also I have calculated that the arc reached a maximum of 60 degrees altitude due north rather than 70 degrees. Further, I would be interested to know if anyone else has seen the fast moving “curtains” travelling along the arc from east to west. They can be best described as bands which were perpendicular to the direction of the arc.

    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    The display seems to have subsided now (20:00 UT) but I just wanted to jot down what I saw whilst it is fresh in my memory. I am in a semi rural location near the Norfolk Broads. Probably about 18:35 I went outside to look at the sky and there was an arc of milky light running almost due east to due west which I thought at first was cloud. I went to grab my camera and the first image I took was at about 18:42. This showed it was definitely an aurora. The arc ran through Perseus in the east, then probably up to 70 degrees above the northern horizon then down to the west. It was quite well defined. Above it in the east near the horizon was a red glow that showed up well in an image. What was really interesting was that as the arc strengthened in intensity curtains of light travelled along the arc from east to west. I was surprised at how quickly they were travelling. I would say that they covered about 15 degrees of arc in a few seconds.

    This is only the second big display I have ever seen so my technical knowledge of how to describe it is poor. The arc dissipated about 18:45 and then returned again to the same strength. I took photos until about 19:10. A bit after that I could see some reddish glow due north (my dinner was ready so I had to go in!). Pictures to follow.

    in reply to: Litigation by BAA #619733
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Hi David. I didn’t need to be logged in to read this pdf via this link, so I guess it is visible to non members too. Don’t know if this is an issue. Duncan.

    in reply to: Where is the blue dot? #619672
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks Alex and David. I can see now it is obvious in the pdf version of the journal but it wasn’t very obvious in the printed version. Looking in better light I can now see it but it eluded me this morning. It seemed a bit like a “where’s Wally”. Tonally, it blended into the background or perhaps it is just me.

    in reply to: C/2023 P1 #619516
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks Nick, very interesting to watch the whole sequence. The angle between the tails grows and the comet definitely appears to be fading. Big CME from the sun towards the end!

    in reply to: Recordings of the VSS Meeting on Sat 2nd October #619349
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks for this Andy. I have started watching these and it’s great to catch up on what I missed.

    in reply to: RW Cephei great dimming #619102
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    This star has now returned to its normal range of magnitudes. There is a paper that has appeared in the Astronomical Journal (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/ace59d) where the authors have imaged the star during the great dimming using interferometry. They say that they saw an asymmetry in the stars photosphere which suggests a mass ejection of material. This would have cooled and formed a dust cloud that dimmed the star. This is similar to what happened to Betelgeuse in 2020.

    in reply to: C/2023 P1 #619100
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks very much for your detailed news item about the comet. I did try to find it Sunday morning but even though we have had some “clear skies” we have been plagued by hazy conditions and there was too much murk near the horizon to make it possible to view anything. I will try again, weather permitting, when it moves round to the evening sky in a few days time.

    in reply to: C/2023 P1 #619048
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    That’s a pretty amazing picture and a fantastic tail only marred by the curse of the satellite trail.

    in reply to: C/2023 P1 #619036
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    Thanks Nick. I did see this other forum post but I missed the detail about it remaining close to the sun. When I first read it I thought it was a discussion about visual comet finders versus automated surveys. I think it would be useful to have a specific news item that just describes what is going on with this comet in slightly more layman’s terms. Clearly some people are getting good pictures of it but it means getting up an hour before twilight?

    I think it is annoying that this comet is getting heralded in the press as yet another comet for the general public to see but it sounds like it is anything but easy to follow.

    in reply to: Variable Star Section Meeting, Sept 2 #619002
    Duncan Hale-Sutton
    Participant

    That’s great Andy. I look forward to seeing what you have when you have time.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 48 total)