Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Gary PoynerParticipant
I think ALL subscriptions are due on (or before) August 1st. I’ve always paid mine early, so I can’t say for sure whether a reminder is sent out.
Log into ‘Account’ on the web page, and you’ll find all the information there.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantUnfortunately I was just too young to go on the Monte Umbe trip (15y), but I was old enough to go to Earls Court to see Pink Floyd in May of ’73 to hear the whole of Dark Side of the Moon live. An eclipse is just an eclipse, but this gig will never be forgotton! I have no regrets.
Interestingly, EMI gave a press reception at the London Planetarium in February 1973 just after the release of DSOTM, but only Richard Wright of the band attended. The others were not happy with the inferior sound system brought in by EMI. Fussy lot these rock gods 🙂
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantWhat have questions 9-13 got to do with the Journal?
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantI just don’t see the problem with the DB telling you that your observation hasn’t been checked. It’s an important piece of information to pass on if your DB prides itself in attempting to check the data that is entered into it.
Sorry Paul, but I just don’t get it.
Cheers,
GaryGary PoynerParticipantPaul,
Why do you think you are being admonished? The sequences for the BAAVSS visual charts have all been entered into the database. When you try to upload a visual observation, it’s checked against the sequence. If there is an error it finds it and doesn’t allow you to enter the observation. The AAVSO DB doesn’t do this. It just goes in – error and all! Our system is far superior.
If you use an AAVSO chart, our DB doesn’t have any sequence information for these charts. They don’t use a lettered sequence of course, and their chart ID is dynamic – and there are thousands of charts. So, our DB sees the chart reference, doesn’t recognise it, then informs you that the chart is unrecognized and that it can’t perform the check for errors. And thats it! The observation still goes into our DB. Most of my observations are made with AAVSO charts, and my data sits happily in the VSS database.
I just don’t understand your concerns!
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantWonderful. Many thanks Denis.
I’m sure John Bortle used an observatory similar to the ‘merry-go-round’ observatory.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantCaptured this photo yesterday evening (Feb 23) with a hand held iPhone 12. Had to brave the dodgy hill opposite my house though, but a nice view visually.
Gary
Attachments:
Gary PoynerParticipantMy wife and I observed this too – from Morrisons car park in Walsall. There was fog, and the blue sun strip on my windscreen helped too. It was very obvious. Time 11:30 UT Jan 21.
Not the most exotic of locations to make an astronomical observation (no offence to my black country neighbours).
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantObserving statistics for 2022.
Gary Poyner (Birmingham)
A record year – the most observing nights from my location in Kingstanding, Birmingham since I began to record weather data in 1978. Admittedley most of the observing opportunities were with broken cloud, or mere breaks in cloud, but a record is a record.
The year seems evenly split for clear skies before and after the Solstice. Clear skies from dusk to dawn were rare with just 14 during the year, but slightly better than 2021 which recorded 11. Most of these were in the shorter Summer months.
2022 (2021 in parentheses)
Clear nights (less than 50% cloud) 41 (19)
Partially clear nights (50% or more cloud) 103 (100)
Totally cloudy nights 221.
Total observable nights 144 (119) with 74 (82) of these nights having Moonlight interference. I made observations
on 139 nights.Total hours at the telescope 303.67h (227.7h)
Best month August with 17 nights, 9 clear and 8 partially clear (April – 16)
Worst month November with 8 partially clear nights and 0 clear (December -3)Birmingham Met office gave incorrect information on cloud cover for 77 nights during 2022 (73). They remain consistantly dire.
Total visual VS observations for 2022 is 12,005 (8,201), an increase of 3,804 on 2022. CCD single measures using remote telescopes COAST, SLOOH and the AAVSO SRO-50 and MPO-61 are 2,996 (3,527), a decrease of 531 on 2021 – mainly due to a long Monsoon in the SW of the USA and prolongued down-time with COAST.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 4 months ago by Gary Poyner.
Attachments:
Gary PoynerParticipantYes Duncan. If the chart is on the web, then observers are encouraged to upgrade their charts to include the new revised ones.
I haven’t yet been notified of your request to join the alert group. If nothing happens in the next 24h, drop me an email and I’ll do it manually.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantHello Duncan,
News of the latest chart updates will be announced in the December Circular, which is available from December 1st.
John Toone also announced an update to the chart for BL Lac on our BAAVSS-Alert mail group on October 31st, as BL Lac is currently undergoing a rare bright state, and the sequence needed to be extended somewhat.
regards,
GaryGary PoynerParticipantVSnet seems to be back. I’ve received lots of observations from Japanese observers this morning (Oct 31).
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantHi Robin,
It must be down. My last message from vsnet was Oct 20, and since that date my observations posts to vsnet have been bouncing too.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantThose of you who have been monitoring OJ287 during the last few weeks will know that the ‘flare’ did not happen at the predicted date, and it doesn’t look like it will happen in the error margin either (Oct 20, see above). This looks like being a rare failure for the OJ team in their predictions for disk impacts/flares, and more information will be posted here when it becomes available.
Thanks to those who have reported observations over the past few weeks, and those observers (and others of course) are asked to continue monitoring OJ287 to see what the next few weeks or months bring with it’s optical behaviour.
Please report your data to the VSS in the usual way.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantDefinitely brighter, and unlikely to be an RCB dust event on this occasion…
Sep 03.202UT 7.644TG +/- 0.001 SLOOH Chile.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantHi Tony,
I’ve had Ian’s photometer in my care since April. When we have our next VSS section meeting, I’ll bring it along.
The device is currently in the possesion of my old friend Rob Januszewski, who knows a thing or two about these things, and he’s hoping to fire it up and test it at some stage in the near future. I’m sure Rob will report back through this forum when he’s had a go.
Gary
28 July 2022 at 11:22 am in reply to: Talk about Irish Astronomer: John Birmingham (1816–1884) #611637Gary PoynerParticipantThank you for sharing the link Ronan. I’ve searched far and wide for years for a likeness of him without success.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantNot a chance from North Brum (even if clear), but SLOOH C2 captured an image on June 8…
June 8.052 9.461CV (0.002)
June 8.053 9.468TG (0.008)So it’s already nearly two mags fainter than it’s peak on June 7 (AAVSO light curve).
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantThanks for mentioning it Nick. I’m looking forward to watching the meeting on YouTube over the weekend.
V482 Cyg seems to have paused in it’s decline at the moment (according to V, mv values), but it’s worth keeping an eye on over the next few weeks to see what happens.
I assume it will get redder as it fades, but it’s been so long since it did anything that there are only visual data covering the fades. Looking at the AID, the first V measures occured in 2000 and after.
Gary
Gary PoynerParticipantCloudy here in Birmingham last night/this morning, but clear at SLOOH Tenerife…
V482 Cyg May 24.149UT 11.84CV
V482 Cyg May 24.149UT 12.02TGObservations should be made every night if possible please, and reported to the BAAVSS as soon as possible. There is no way of knowing how deep V482 Cyg will go if it continues to fade, but observers should be careful of a close 13.7 mag star 7″ to the SW if V482 Cyg approaches mag 14.0
Gary
-
AuthorPosts