Jeremy Shears

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 591 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fast moving White Dwarf #582940
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    A good start Paul. Hope you get better conditions that will allow you to go a bit deeper on this target.

    in reply to: Fast moving White Dwarf #582833
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    We can relax now because the BBC has the definitive news item on its website and this object.

    in reply to: Fast moving White Dwarf #582831
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Thanks David. I am glad you are maintaining your catholic tastes in print media. What a crazy article! I always remember Patrick citing Oph as the 13th sign of the zodiac in his debunking of astrology.

    BTW, Cornflakes and marmelade was my inclusive short-hand for breakfast, which in my case is “Dorset cereals seriously nutty muesli”, with banana, blueberries, low fat Greek yoghurt, and semi-skimmed milk, but I thought that might sound a bit too bourgeoisie. 

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582754
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Fourth rebrightening, Gary? It’s hardly out of the stalls, yet! 

    I think the record holder is EZ Lyn, which showed 11 rebrightenings during its 2006 outburst.

    Maybe we should have a VSS sweepstake on how many PQ And will undergo. I’ll say 6, but I hope there are more.

    in reply to: Edwin Holmes and Edwin Hubble link #582586
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    No, not really! Well done Richard! The competition was a great idea Denis. My thinking was that Holmes was infamous for his vitriolic letters which he sent to all and sundry over many years. He rubbed many people up the wrong way through this and I was thinking that Hubble might have been a recipient. But I was obviously barking up the wrong tree!

    Great webinar Nick!

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582578
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    An Astronomer’s Telegram, ATel #13776, from the Kyoto group publishes a spectrum taken on June 2. This “showed Balmer absorption lines with emission cores, which are typically seen in dwarf nova outbursts. There are no signals of O III, which were reported in the 1988 outburst”, although they question the 1988 conclusion.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582573
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    I have poor horizons from my obsy, Graeme. But I’m lucky enough to have a second, portable, set up with an AZEQ6 mount which enables me to decamp to more favourable observing locations for special events like this.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582572
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Nice work, Tim! Looks like you solved your problem, but just to say I use V-band comparison star data from the AAVSO VSP. Comps for PQ And are listed here. If you used a V-filter on your camera (which I assume is monochrome?), the resulting mags are quoted as CCD-V. If unfiltered they would be CCD-CV.

    Thanks for tackling this star!

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582564
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    My goodness, Robin! You have certainly given this your best efforts. As you say, remarkable that you got anything given the circumstances!

    in reply to: VSS Circular 184 now available #582545
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Glad you enjoyed the VSS Circular, Daryl.

    On the subject of Betelgeuse, we are hoping that Dr Mark Kidger, who wrote about Betelgeuse in this edition and the last one, will speak about the star during a BAA Wednesday webinar. Keep an eye on the webinar listings.

    Back numbers of VSSC’s can be accessed here.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582542
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Good to see people overcoming the odds and securing successful observations of PQ And. I managed to see it this morning at about 02.25 BST. I decamped with my 12 cm refractor to a field a mile away and it’s far too low from my obsy as you can see from the angle of my telescope in the dawn sky.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582519
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    James, it’s difficult to say as it’s so dependent on your specific set-up, plus we have a brightening sky to contend with. If we are going to extract photometry from images, the star and its comparisons should not be saturated. This will result in shorter exposures than you might normally consider to get a “pretty picture” (but a pretty picture would also be nice as this is such a rare event!). Thus it’s best is to bracket with a range of exposures. Also avoid saving as a file type that compresses the image, like jpg, as that will involve loss of data.

    in reply to: PQ And in very rare outburst #582515
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Maybe a saw, Robin?

    Good luck, though. It would be great to get some spectroscopy.

    in reply to: Did you know ! #582417
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Quite right Nick!

    Regarding lunar craters, one cater name after a woman was in honour one of the first women to be admitted to the RAS, Mary Adela Blagg. It is particularly fitting as Mary was an accomplished selenographer who made a significant contribution to standardising the nomenclature of lunar features. She was also a BAA Member.

    in reply to: C/2020 F8 (SWAN) #582391
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    I hope you have copyrighted your surname, David.

    Just be careful you don’t fizzle out! Otherwise you might have to change your name by deed poll.

    in reply to: Advice on variable star photometry setup #582376
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Hello Roy,

    you might like to have a look at James Screech’s BAA Members pages too. For some of his photometry he uses an 80 mm refractor. Also uses an ASI1600MM camera.

    Also have a look at Gary’s news article on OJ287. I followed this target with my 100 mm refractor.

    Jeremy

    in reply to: Advice on variable star photometry setup #582375
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Hello Roy,

    following on from Gary’s reply, welcome to the Variable Star Section!

    I’m not sure if you already have your kit or you are looking to buy. If you have some already I suggest you start with that.

    I used a 100 mm refractor with a CCD camera for several years for photometry of variable stars. I typically took 60 sec exposures, which enabled photometry down to 15th mag, although I could detect stars much fainter than this. I was lucky enough to have a decent mount so unguided exposures were absolutely fine. It also had GOTO so I was able to find targets easily, but not essential.

    There is some info about VS CCD targets here.

    Most people are using CCD rather than CMOS. Latter can be used, but you have to be careful about calibration as the response of the chip is less linear.

    Hope this helps. Happy to answer further q’s.

    Jeremy Shears

    VSS Director

    in reply to: Still problems #582346
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Hello Alex,

    I understand there was a problem with YouTube streaming this webinar, but as you say it worked on Zoom.

    However, should you wish to catch up, the recording is now available on the BAA YouTube channel.

    Jeremy

    in reply to: Strange website behaviour? #582316
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    I had a similar occurrence earlier, Chris. Using Chrome, when liking an image, I was directed to login, even though I was logged in. I got over it simply by refreshing the page. Maybe that cleared out the cache of previous setting. All has been well since.

    in reply to: Winchester Weekend, Sparsholt, April 2016 #582232
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Did I hear someone mention keys?

Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 591 total)