Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 477 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Braided structure in F3 NEOWISE dust tail #582823
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    They want fame, notoriety and followers – that way lies a big ego boost and advertising revenue. You see quite a few, er, augmented, pictures these days. Some more subtle than this.

    I’m only surprised its not the Zetans coming in off the shoulder of Orion at last. 🙂

    in reply to: C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) #582746
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Morning of the 6th there were tiny gaps in the cloud and drizzle. 

    Morning of the 7th a bank of cloud from N-NW with tiny gaps, but huge clear bits overhead. Stood and hoped for an hour but didnt see it with binoculars nor on the SLR.  🙂

    Perhaps tomorrow.

    Despite that, the stillness of the predawn was wonderful.

    EDIT: Eventually saw it evening of 10th. Worth the wait. Alas I fell asleep in a chair waiting for it to clear some trees for the 2am observation.

    in reply to: Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) estimates #582671
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    AstroArt7 does too – but obviously you would need a paid upgrade. Though AA7 is impressive and, most importantly, has a nice scripting language which is useful.

    in reply to: A ring around a red star #582669
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I have a Baader Oxygen filter which seemed to leak. I gave up using it because of it.

    There may have been a faulty batch at some point.

    in reply to: Photometric filters #582611
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    This evening the Farpoint site was still showing them as available – though not always in stock.

    in reply to: Crew Dragon launch #582502
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    As far as I understand it, about 10 mins after launch the second stage separates from the dragon capsule. Presumably, it then lags behind steadily as drag and the capsule thrusters start to do their thing. So, by the time they pass over us it would be quite a big separation. Anyone any ideas how big?

    I’m wondering what lens to use to get both. As I’m only using a tripod, I’m assuming something like a 85-135mm with a short exposure and high ISO to avoid tralling. 

    This is going to be fun. 🙂

    PS I believe that on this variant of the system the solar panels are actually fix mounted on the vehicle and do not deploy.

    in reply to: Crew Dragon Visibility from UK #582500
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    That looks like a rather nice way to spend some time this evening.

    Now we just need good weather here and at Canaveral. 🙂

    in reply to: SBIG ST Parallel Port Cameras #582433
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I’m with Callum on this, buy a cheap 32 bit used laptop for £60 and use that to run the camera only? 

    Have you established why the adaptors do not work?

    in reply to: SBIG ST Parallel Port Cameras #582429
    Grant Privett
    Participant
    in reply to: software for finding faint asteroid tracks #582389
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Daniel Parrott, the US developer of Tycho Tracker, has just released another version of Tycho Tracker. As before, the best way of using it is via GPU – the good news is that it now lets you test the GPU you have installed and tells you if its compatible. If its not the right sort (or capable enough) the CPU option is still there.

    A friend had trouble using the GPU version under a Linux Windows emulator (wine?) but now theres a CPU version that problem may not apply. I tried it on 22x 4min Starlight H18 frames of the ecliptic taken with an 11″ RASA and it found 5 asteroids on the frame (and identified them) and in addition a single unknown object down at mag 19 – that looked real to me. It wasnt quick (5.5hrs) but I set Tycho running when I went to bed and looked at the results as I munched my muesli the next morning.

    Its fairly straight forward to use and there is a manual. A full licence is $US 25 but you get a month to play with it before having to decide.

    in reply to: Very bright Starlink train #582308
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I’m sure we will get many such opportunities over the next decade.

    Anyone any idea what the system lifetime is? Though if they make money they will of course lob up replacements for those descending.

    in reply to: EQ6 Drive Conversions Kit #582225
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I could do some stills on any tricky bits perhaps.

    in reply to: EQ6 Drive Conversions Kit #582208
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Hope to have a bash at the weekend  – by which time I hope to have found the Lithium grease I bought a couple of years back.

    The downside of being home for 2 weeks is l run out of excuses as to why I have not done the outstanding DIY jobs around the house…

    in reply to: EQ6 Drive Conversions Kit #582204
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I purchased 4x SKF 608 2RSH bearings for the worms. Hopefully, they will do the job. 

    Had heard the large bearings were best cleaned up rather than replaced. You hear stories of swarf and misplaced paint in EQ6 bearings, so a good clean may well be needed. I’m certain I have some lithium grease around here somewhere.

    The PE for the mount has always been rather noisy with the occasional big unpredictable spike which meant 10 minute exposures often had elongated stars. Normally 5mins is sufficient, but it would be nice to have the option of 10 minutes for narrow band filtered images.  

    in reply to: EQ6 Drive Conversions Kit #582193
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Sounds very hopeful – I’m not finding many people saying “No, don’t bother” so I have decided to go ahead. Thats going to knacker the kitchen table for a couple of days….

    Yeah a MyT or Ioptron60 would be the obvious alternative but this option is a lot cheaper, so I will see how it goes – and report back.

    in reply to: software for finding faint asteroid tracks #582126
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Version 5.3 was released this week. You don’t need a GPU to run it, but it will be slow. But, we all have lots of spare time at home suddenly…. 

    Also, as feedback, you will find that it doesnt seem to like pre-2015 GPUs – even with the latest CUDA drivers.

    in reply to: EQ6 Drive Conversions Kit #582121
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Thanks for the info. How long did it take you? I could be in trouble if the kitchen table is a telescope mount for more than a day or two… 

    I will probably take the opportunity to do a general strip down….

    in reply to: Starlink-3 photobombs 29P #582110
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Oh. Not exactly quiet yet, is it?

    I was supposed to be going to one of the Scottish islands for my wedding anniversary and first Flybe went under and then Loganair cancelled my flight from Glasgow, so I had figured things were a bit quieter than that.

    in reply to: Starlink-3 photobombs 29P #582106
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    During the period when the volcano Eyjfjallajokull was blowing its top in Iceland and flights over the UK were closed down, we had a surprising run of clear night when a high pressure occurred. It will be interesting to see if that sort of thing repeats.

    in reply to: Starlink-3 photobombs 29P #582102
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Its interesting that Wikipedia cite SpaceX as identifying a possible $30B market for Starlink services. So, given a toss up between his company making ludicrous mounts of cash (3:1 return on investment) and saving astronomy which do you reckon he will go for?

    Starlink might better be advertised as ” Enabling rural gamers”.

    Shame PPARC (now STFC) cannot get a royalty for the use by SpaceX of the name of their late lamented Starlink astronomy software project.

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 477 total)