Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
If you are limited in how far away you can mount the grating then the SA200 can give you the dispersion you need for useful resolution but it does not quite match the SA100 at double the distance. The field curvature is also more severe and you can see this in your spectrum as it widens towards the red end. Getting the best result is a compromise with what is a primitive setup but think of it as good inexpensive way to “cut your teeth” before upgrading to a “proper” spectrograph if the bug bites
Sorry for any typos, I am on holiday and using a portable device. Normal service should be resumed next week.
Yes it is standard practise to align and stack shorter exposures with slitless spectra (on the zero order image) as it avoids guiding, effectively using the same techniques as planetary imagers to select the sharpest images (but no further processing eg sharpening etc) modern CMOS also means the noise penalty is lower than with CCD
Cheers
Robin
As a rough guide to what setups work I developed a simple calculator which is hosted on the Rspec website. (The Rspec software there is good for beginners using the Star analyser but you will outgrow it as you progress to more research based spectroscopy)
https://www.rspec-astro.com/calculator
There is a tutorial on the Star Analyser on the site here
https://www.britastro.org/downloads/15701
and if you are interested in its development, I talk about it here
https://britastro.org/video/11250/12234
Cheers
Robin
You ar in the right place, I developed the Star Analyser
P Cygni is an excellent test target It shows nice clear emission lines of H and He, ideal to focus on (focus on the features in the spectrum, not on the zero order star image, noting that the field curvature, particularly with long spectra means that the focus will vary along the spectrum to some extent
http://www.threehillsobservatory.co.uk/astro/spectroscopy_16.htm#SA200_filter_wheel
16 inch is a big aperture for a slitless converging beam setup though unless the seeing is exceptional. The resolution is at best defined by the size of the star image relative to the length of the spectrum. The problem is as you increase the length of the spectrum the aberrations of the simple setup get worse and if you try to use a lower focal ratio to keep the star image small, the aberrations also get worse due to the steeply converging beam so these setups work best on modest apertures. give it a go though and I can help steer you to get the best out of the setup
don’t worry too much about software at this stage, concentrate on getting a clear image. It is a low resolution “broad brush” type of device and most of the interesting features the Star Analyser are immediately visible. This is an example of the sort of features you should be able to pick up.
https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20201216_234948_8cabda965bfe692f
Cheers
Robin
A nice collection of spectra building up here in the Spectroscopy Database showing the evolution
The shift in the H alpha line from predominantly blue to red while still centred on the rest wavelength is curious. I wonder what that means physically
Cheers
Robin
Prof Steve Shore comments on the evolution of Nova Del 2013 based on amateur spectra here. Not simple though !
http://www.astrosurf.com/aras/novae/Nova2013Del-1.html
Cheers
robin
Very broad P Cygni H and He by the looks. Almost overlapping with the high velocity. Almost a supernova like spectrum
Intriguingly a low resolution Star Analyser spectrum by Rob Kaufman in Australia earlier today failed to show any significant emission
After clear blue skies all afternoon the clouds have rolled in here but no doubt we will have better spectra tonight
While watching the recent partial eclipse in largely cloudy skies I wondered if it might be possible to follow an eclipse even in cloudy conditions in spectra of the sky. The shape of the spectrum line profiles should alter slightly as different parts of the rotating solar disc are covered. (Similar to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect see in the spectrum of eclipsing binaries) Does anyone know if this type of observation has ever been attempted ?
Cheers
Robin
Here are 6 spectra around that date from the BAA spectroscopy database (From David Boyd (2), Kevin Gurney, Hugh Allen, John Coffin and me)
They all line up in wavelength precisely
Cheers
Robin
In fact I see further down the thread Hugh actually wavelength calibrated Mike’s prism spectrum to produce a graph of the spectrum with a linear wavelength axis.
https://britastro.org/comment/10463#comment-10463
You can see there that the wavelengths then agree in Mike’s Hugh’s and my spectra (and indeed with those by David Boyd and John Coffin in the same thread)
I just checked mine and Hugh’s spectra from 23rd March in the Nova Cas 2021 thread. The graphed spectra are calibrated in wavelength with a linear X axis and the Balmer (and other line) wavelengths are correct and consistent between the two spectra
https://britastro.org/comment/10272#comment-10272
https://britastro.org/comment/10277#comment-10277
Mike’s spectrum image is not calibrated in wavelength.
https://britastro.org/comment/10242#comment-10242
Prism spectra are very non linear with the short wavelength end significantly stretched and the longer wavelengths compressed
All spectrographs are non linear to at least some degree and have to be individually calibrated in wavelength. Mike’s spectrograph is fundamentally different to mine for example. His uses a prism and the dispersion is due to refraction whereas mine (and Hugh’s) uses a diffraction grating and the dispersion is due to diffraction. As a result the relationship between wavelength and distance along the spectrum are completely different and in fact run in opposite directions ! (with diffraction the short wavelengths are least deflected whereas in refraction the short wavelengths are refracted the most)
Cheers
Robin
The ASI 034MC was an astro camera not a webcam though and cost new similar to the current equivalent ASI120 (~£120). Cheaper domestic webcams would not go as deep. Add to that the cost of the specially adapted guidescope and you can see why a commercial equivalent to this design is going to cost ~£200
Just come across this on “Cloudy Nights”. I’ve not tried it but it looks like you strap the phone to your scope, centre a nearby bright star in the main scope and then use the phone as a “virtual sky” to hop to your target
Here is my DIY version using Meccano and Jubilee clips used as an electronic finder on my remote setup. I don’t find it that sensitive though with the old webcam I am using, perhaps mag 4-5. (Maybe more modern webcams are better) Good enough to put a bright star in the main camera field to do a local sync of the goto though.
Cheers
Robin
