Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Robin LeadbeaterParticipant
If the grub screw was not loose and the locking collar cannot be turned even after loosening the screw it is unlikely that this is the reason that the micrometer had become tight. (Did it suddenly become tight or has it becoming increasingly tight over time). Can you tell from my photos and comparing with the other LHIRES if the collar is engaged or disengaged ?
Other than that I guess it needs an overhaul, removing it, unscrewing the barrel cleaning and re-lubricating. Mine is still fine after 18 years though (I recall you have a remote adjustment, could this have been preloading it causing premature wear?)
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantPhotos with the collar engaged and disengaged
Attachments:
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantI just used a Jeweller’s screwdriver but if the grub screw is tight then it seems unlikely that the collar has moved so it probably is not the reason for the micrometer becoming tight. With mine the locking collar is close to the spectrograph body when engaged and there is a definite gap with it disengaged. I will take a couple of photos.
Cheers
RobinRobin LeadbeaterParticipantThere is a knurled collar at the base of the micrometer held in position with a tiny cross head grub screw which is used to lock the micrometer at a given setting. Has that got tightened down? Mine is fully wound off (anticlockwise) and locked down with the grub screw.
Cheers
RobinRobin LeadbeaterParticipantMeanwhile ZTF have “discovered” their second high proper motion star in the past 3 months
https://www.wis-tns.org/object/2023acmv
https://www.wis-tns.org/object/2024dumRobin
28 February 2024 at 1:42 am in reply to: Request for observations of the nearby supernova SN 2024cld #621881Robin LeadbeaterParticipantThat’s odd. According to time on the confirming spectrum on TNS, it was taken a day before the discovery date
Robin
Followed this up with the GOTO team. The date of the spectrum was indeed wrong and is now corrected in TNS
Robin
23 February 2024 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Request for observations of the nearby supernova SN 2024cld #621842Robin LeadbeaterParticipantThat’s odd. According to time on the confirming spectrum on TNS, it was taken a day before the discovery date
Robin
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantStars with H alpha emission lines (of which there are several in the Pleiades) in a narrow band H alpha filter (where the solar spectrum has a deep absorption) might be interesting.
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantIt is ok, it looks like they are now being diverted to spam
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantHi Andy,
I don’t appear to have received any newsletters since no 72 last October. Are they archived anywhere ?
Cheers
RobinRobin LeadbeaterParticipantInteresting. I don’t think the comparison between the mass deorbited and the amount of material in the Van Allen belt is particularly helpful as the two are not comparable (We already receive ~ 40T/day of metals from meteorites) but at the future projected rate of 23 satellite deorbits a day (in the paper) the amount of additional material would appear to be comparable.
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantI have just been listening to one of the scientists involved in that study on BBC world service Science in Action
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w3ct4sdl
starting at 22:40Robin
29 January 2024 at 11:57 pm in reply to: AT2024bch – A potentially bright supernova in NGC3206 #621490Robin LeadbeaterParticipantNow classified spectroscopically as type IIn by Italian amateur Claudio Balcon
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantThere could be some financial advantage to extending the time over which power can be generated rather than increasing capacity on the ground. For a region heavily dependent on solar power, the price of night time electricity must presumably attract a high premium due to the high cost of storage or alternative generating capacity.
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantI don’t see any convincing arguments for using LED lights with a high blue spectral content for outdoor lighting and many reasons why it should not be used. Why any council lighting engineers should still be pushing back on this these days when alternatives with a lower blue content are available is beyond me
Here is his Mario Motta’s review from a US perspective.
https://www.mariomottamd.com/street-lighting/Robin LeadbeaterParticipantSee a presentation on this at the 2018 joint BAA/AAVSO meeeting
https://britastro.org/event/baa-aavso-joint-meeting-on-variable-stars
Mario Motta – American Medical Association statement on street lighting
There could be a video of it somewhere on the website
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantNot sure why the quote was attributed to Melvyn, it was actually from Grant
Robin
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantI tried pointing out to the local lighting officer and my County Councillor that lower colour temperature LEDs were better, as they reduced scattered light in hazy/foggy conditions
You would probably have more success going on social media saying blue LED lighting causes cancer. (Unlike with 5G there is apparently some evidence to support this and has caused some towns in the US to rip out their recently installed blue LEDs in favour of lower temperature versions. See a presentation on this at the 2018 joint BAA/AAVSO meeeting). Failing this, pointing out the effect on wildlife might gain more traction among the general public, particularly if yo have any green councillors
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantRichard Berry is trying the Origin out for variable star photometry. There is the opportunity to use the green channel as with DSLRs, or all the light, depending on the goal of the observation.
The HOYS Citizen Science Project are accepting observations from ZWO Seestar 50mm telescopes, these use a colour CMOS chip. This is a research project run by Dirk Froebrich at the University of Kent, to monitor young stars.
Both of these approaches use the raw files saved by these smart-telescopes, rather than the processed images displayed on smartphones and tablets.
AndyThese ideas might attract people into scientific applications of their kit but these solutions are pretty suboptimal. It reminds me of the days of converting webcams for deep sky imaging. The results were impressive given the limitations of the kit but far from what came after based on the huge interest in imaging it generated. Hopefully the smart scope manufacturers might see there is a market for mono sensors which can take filters. ZWO should be perfectly placed to do this for example as their SeeStar uses the same CMOS sensor in colour version as another of their cameras which uses the mono version (There are apparently already people using Star Analyser on the front of this scope and even hacking into it to mount it internally, though the colour sensor is a big drawback)
There are other examples of areas where there is a tension between what is good for (marketing to) imagers and not for science. For example fancy mulit-coatings which make the difference between 95 and 98% are a disaster for short wavelength measurements.
Robin LeadbeaterParticipantPerhaps with these smart telescopes a swap out for a mono sensor might be feasible ? I used to do this kind microsurgery on webcams back in the day but my eyes and hands are not up to that now and I expect the pins are much closely spaced. If it uses a separate off the shelf camera module it might be possible though if there is a mono version. (Plus a firmware hack to get at the raw image before debayering)
With the Unistellar, being an open tube you can get in to put filters (or even a diffraction grating) in front of the camera
-
AuthorPosts