Grant Privett

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 341 through 360 (of 491 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I would use my telescope more if easier #580896
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I used a Meade LS-8 a couple of years ago. That was a case of shove it on the tripod, put tripod outside, plug in and flick switch. It handled all the leveling, north finding, GPS location/time and pointing refinement with an attached built in webcam. Failed 1 in 10 times and took about 10 mins.

    You can take image of up to about 30s (threw away about 25% of pics) before field rotation trails the stars and its fine for planets. Got some quite nice pics with one using a Starlight H18.

    Worth considering. Its doesnt get any easier – unless you go for a permanent set up. Richard Miles has an impressive solution…

    in reply to: 2019 EA2: close approach #580877
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Weather down south also looks poor. Moon will be full too.

    in reply to: Ordering observations by azimuth #580846
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Personally, I would go with mending the dome. Better solution long term.

    in reply to: Sky & Telescope in trouble #580845
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I imagine whether it is bad news depends upon who buys it.

    In recent years it had become a pale shadow of its former self.

    in reply to: Hubble Constant. #580813
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Does the measurement depend on how you look, or where you look? They are quite distinct things.

    in reply to: Remote control of scope and Lhires #580773
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Theres at least one USB relay on Amazon that can be run via a simple serial port command (but which plugs into USB). If not done in Python its only a few lines in VB6 to create an executable that opened or closed the relay. It even has a small LED on it so you can see the relay status.

    in reply to: How tall is a giraffe? #580748
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Whats a bus in furlongs?

    in reply to: Comet Section Meeting on Saturday, May 18 #580735
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    That does look rather nice.

    in reply to: Comet Section Meeting on Saturday, May 18 #580733
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I must admit I too was tempted until I saw it was in York. Its just too far away for me. About 5hrs continuous traffic-jam-free driving or 4.5hrs on the train. Could stay for the weeknd but have other commitments.

    Britain is big and, in the past, meetings have too often been in the south, so I am certainly not complaining.

    Looking forward to enjoying the videos from a comfy chair.

    in reply to: How tall is a giraffe? #580716
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Is that real football or the other sort?

    Perhaps play it safe and measure in perch, rods and chains*?

    * For those unfamiliar with the joys of the archaic Imperial units. A chain is the same length as a cricket pitch 🙂

    in reply to: Observatory Planning Permission #580691
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Isnt his raising an objection at this late stage a conflict of interest?

    Also,someone not far from here and had a Meade LX200 in his observatory – which was in a conservation area. He appears to have got round it by making the observatory walls out of stone and flint (local materials) and making the roof dark.

    in reply to: Observatory Planning Permission #580689
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    What were the grounds for rejection? Was it because the building is listed, because its in a conservation area or something more mundane like being over 2.4m high and near a boundary?

    in reply to: Possible nova in M31 #580613
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    You got more than me!

    Yeah, the coding is fun. More fiddly, than difficult. I wrote some in VB6 a few years ago – that used Source Extractor output, but it could just as easily have used Pisa or Daophot instead.  I imagine many would use Python instead of VB6 these days. 🙂

    in reply to: Sky and Telescope #580589
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    The problem is it went from owners who wanted to make a living to owners who wanted to be rich with the minimum possible effort.

    You see it in business a lot. Buy something good, reduce standards, cut costs and milk that asset!

    in reply to: Lunar Eclipse Tonight #580580
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    In Salisbury it was hopeful when I went to bed, but at 02:50 and 04:15 it was thick cloud…. The sort of cloud that says, there may be a moon in there somewhere but you’ve no idea where.

    Ho hum. Perhaps I should have moved east when I retired.

    in reply to: Sky and Telescope #580572
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    The magazine changed after it was taken over. It went from being focused on the real enthusiasts with good (substantial) equipment review, observing accounts from experienced observers and cutting edge stuff, to a slim shadow of its former self and devoid of interest to all but beginners.

    It still has some good writers, but a lot of the content is fairly lightweight.

    Shame.

    in reply to: Which planet is closest to Earth ? #580544
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Closest now or closest ever?

    in reply to: Sirius B #580529
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Touche. 🙂

    in reply to: Sirius B #580527
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    Yep. Its no big deal. We disagree. It  happens.

    But, should I respect that saying from Feynman more because he was an authority on quantum electrodynamics?

    Ho hum. Back to the gardening.

    in reply to: Sirius B #580525
    Grant Privett
    Participant

    I think that, if you look back at my posting, you will find that I don’t say that it is the worst. If Owen wants to defend that position, thats entirely up to him. 

    If asked an opinion, I would say it is much the same as all the others, only with a more UK slant in equipment choices. But thats hardly pouring praise on it! Some discussions will be sound and informed, some average, others will be hijacked by fools.

    The net gave us access to more knowledge and with that came a greatly increased supply of gibberish. I think you will find that what I said can be summed up as “The advice may only be worth what you paid for it”. 

    I wish good luck to those of you who do help add quality to the fora and admire your tenacity, but find that what I have to do already fills my waking hours. 

    Also, I don’t think its sniping to point out that a source of information may be significantly suspect.  

Viewing 20 posts - 341 through 360 (of 491 total)