Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Alex PrattParticipant
Hi Denis.
It’s only on for two nights and thankfully they’re not blazing lasers into the sky like they did in 2020. My meteor cameras shouldn’t be plagued this time, hopefully.
Here’s their plans for other cities:
Cheers,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantAlex PrattParticipantHi Nick,
Yes, it’s likely that a body with higher density or cohesive strength would be far less affected. The NASA news release says:
“The recoil from this blast of debris substantially enhanced DART’s push against Dimorphos – a little like a jet of air streaming out of a balloon sends the balloon in the opposite direction. To successfully understand the effect of the recoil from the ejecta, more information on of the asteroid’s physical properties, such as the characteristics of its surface, and how strong or weak it is, is needed. These issues are still being investigated.”
We still need to wear our tin hats…
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantAlex PrattParticipantWe almost take for granted the amazing guidance and control systems required to hit a celestial bullseye at those high velocities – and that the camera will be set to the correct ‘shutter speed and f-stop’.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/dart-s-final-images-prior-to-impact
Looking forward to seeing the images from the CubeSat which was also monitoring the impact!
Alex.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by Alex Pratt.
Alex PrattParticipantNASA TV will be presenting live coverage from 6pm Eastern U.S time, which (I think) equates to 11pm BST.
Amateur and professional astronomers in the southern hemisphere have been asked to obtain photometry of the Didymos+Dimorphos system
https://groups.io/g/IOTAoccultations/message/72575
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Alan,
Drat, double drat and triple drat!
I just wish we could have retained the old website, and that Microsoft had kept my favourite Windows XP, and…
Clear skies,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantThanks Jeremy.
Hmm…Our very own Gordon Taylor worked at the RGO, not MIT (p. 176).
David Dunham gave an excellent presentation on the contributions of occultation observers in measuring the diameters and refining the orbits of NEOs (3200) Phaethon and (99942) Apophis
PowerPoint
YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoK3oUJXaxE
See also the Across Project
https://lagrange.oca.eu/en/home-across
Cheers,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Peter,
Have a look at a couple of pages of the Observers’ Gallery and you’ll see that some list their full ‘name, rank and number’. They can edit this in their profile.
Cheers,
Alex.
11 July 2022 at 9:33 am in reply to: Public release of JWST’s first images and spectra – July 12 #611382Alex PrattParticipantNASA has now announced that President Biden will unveil one preview JWST image at 10pm BST this evening, Monday 11th (NASA TV)
Alex.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex Pratt.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Alan,
Have a look at
https://britastro.org/forums/topic/new-website-members-full-names
Cheers,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Daryl,
The light trends feature suggests that conditions have improved a little at some of my light-polluted locations and worsened at my rural sites. Hmmm. I leave it to others to investigate and comment on this.
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi,
To check the level of light pollution at a specific location in the British Isles (or overseas) I use
https://www.lightpollutionmap.info/
I find that its SQM readings and Bortle Scale estimates are in good agreement with my own obtained on my travels.
Additionally, use
https://lighttrends.lightpollutionmap.info/
to click on a location and generate a plot of the trend in light level.
Clear skies,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantAfter logging out/in a couple of times I was able to get a clean login to Edit my Web profile. I’ve now reset my displayed name to its previous shorter version.
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantI received a copy of Starlight Nights when I was a youngster. It was wonderful and inspiring to read about Leslie Peltier’s journey of astronomical discovery. The attached image shows my first copy (1967) and the modern indexed version (1999).
A gem of a book!
Alex.
Attachments:
Alex PrattParticipantThanks Callum,
Clear skies,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantI can’t see an option to allow me to edit my previous message. I should have written “If one of my videos is larger than the 2MB limit I upload it to my YouTube channel using one of its supported formats…”.
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Steve,
If one of my GIFs is larger than the 2MB limit I upload it to my YouTube channel, then provide a link to it on my BAA Member’s Page. Other media hosting options are available.
Cheers,
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantI once had a telescope almost as badly collimated as that…
https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/11/photons-received-webb-sees-its-first-star-18-times/
Seriously though, I agree it’s fascinating to read the Webb blog
Such well-written and informative articles by the team, explaining an amazing technical achievement in an easy to understand manner.
Alex.
Alex PrattParticipantHi Tim,
We have a lot of experience in recording various types of occultations, and as you say we followed the guidelines for this event and promoted the campaign amongst BAA observers. Many obtained good light curves. Looking at the figures in the paper, their criterion for selecting light curves (for the atmospheric modelling) even rejected the data from the 1-metre at Pic du Midi, no less. They had 90 light curves, so they could be selective.
Note: “…the first group of figures corresponds to light curves that had sufficient S/N to be used in Triton’s atmospheric fit, while the second group is for light curves with lower S/N that were not used in the fit. It should be noted, however, that the best synthetic models expected for those light curves (plotted in grey in Figs. C.6-C.9) are fully consistent with the observations, in the limit of the noise level.”
They received lots of good data and I’m sure we’ll contribute even better light curves next time.
Cheers,
Alex.
-
AuthorPosts