Mr Ian David Sharp

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 110 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617604
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Any explanation for the drop in blue magnitude?

    Yes, as Andy has explained – cooling.
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617599
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Here’s my latest graph including last night’s results (31st May). I make B-V = +0.24.
    Ian.

    in reply to: Newtonian Focusers #617584
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi Grant,

    I own 3 of those SX Midi wheels and also a larger one for 2″ filters and I have only had the droop issue when I was connecting one to a small WO71 APO with a fairly heavy ATIK CCD. I think it was the CCD that did most of the drooping in that case!

    The other scopes I use have much more robust focusers such as Moonlite on my C9.25, and the Tak focuser on my Tak 85. These focusers are designed to carry much heavier loads.

    I don’t think that the SX Midi FW is a particularly heavy example of a filter wheel, so I don’t think I can say anything that will help with your current setup. I think I would have to fall in the ‘buy another focuser’ camp!

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617566
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Good morning all,

    See the attached for the graph of my continuing nightly R, V and B measurements. The continuing drop in blue magnitude is fascinating. B-V was +0.18 last night.

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617551
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Today’s update attached.
    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617540
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Yes my spectrum from last night shows it cooling further to a black body temperature of ~12000K and a fit to an A3v star continuum with a B-V = +0.1

    Here’s today’s RVB magnitude plot. The cooling clearly visible with the latest point B-V = +0.12.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617523
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    That’s useful. The continuum in my spectrum from last night does indeed match an A0v star which by definition has B=V=R

    Thanks for the info Robin, most interesting. I’ve attached my graph again – updated with last night’s points. It seems that the R and B are slowly swapping dominance! Also note the very slight dimming.

    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617515
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    It’s definitely plateaued

    Here are my mags from last night (24th May around 22:30)

    V = 11.03
    B = 11.04
    R = 10.99

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617512
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    How do you calculate its magnitude please ?

    This is not an easy question to answer! I would recommend reading the AAVSO photometry guide which is kept well up to date:

    https://www.aavso.org/sites/default/files/publications_files/ccd_photometry_guide/CCDPhotometryGuide.pdf

    As to the choice of software, I can personally recommend the Tycho Tracker software. The Pro version is well worth the $50 for the licence and is very easy to get going with. There are plenty of YouTube videos to get you started. Many will say to use AstroImageJ (which is free) but I think this is hard to get going with. I also use the amazing (and underrated) AstroArt8 software which is easily scriptable.

    https://www.tycho-tracker.com/

    Hope that helps.
    Ian

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617511
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    What is the V filter I read on earlier?
    I want to do photometry on this. Do you need a really high focal length telescope e.g. C11 or can you do it with smaller lower focal length refractors?
    Can you use a h-alpha filter 7nm bandwidth and do useful photometry ? as I am in a light pollution area.

    You can use smaller telescopes – I regularly use a 100mm refractor to measure stars down to 13th magnitude.

    The V filter is a Johnson/Cousins V Filter. These are standard photometric filters. You can still work unfiltered or use a colour R, G or B filter as long as you specify which was used.

    I don’t believe you would have much success with a narrowband filter.

    Hope that helps
    Ian

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617510
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Very fractionally brighter again last night but looks to be flattening off. These from 22:30 UTC last night:

    V = 11.04
    B = 11.00
    R = 11.02

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617497
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Here are my magnitudes from 23:00 UTC (center) last night. Averaged from 10 measurements with each filter using 120s exposures:

    V = 11.09
    B = 11.06
    R = 11.11

    So a full magnitude brighter than 2 nights ago. Attached is the current light-curve from the BAA photometry database.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617450
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Here’s my LRVB colour version from last night. I’ve uploaded R, V and B mags to the Photometry Database.

    Best Regards
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617429
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Here’s a quick stack of 12 x 180s Luminance from last night (around 22:00 on 20th May). I have R, V and B too.

    I measured the mag. from the V images as 12.11 (average of 6 images)

    C9.27 @ f/7, SX694.

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617420
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Kiochi Itagaki has discovered tonight a type II supernova SN 2023ixf in M101 currently at mag 14.9

    Thanks for the heads-up Robin. I wish I’d seen that last night as I was imaging for photometry from 10:30 until 03:00 here with lovely skies! Looks clear again tonight…

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Creating astronomy tools… #617364
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Can your driver be used under EKOS?

    Perhaps we could discuss this in greater detail by email rather than clogging up the BAA fora.

    I know nothing of this EKOS of which you speak! Yes, let’s talk offline…

    ian.sharp@astro-sharp.com

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Creating astronomy tools… #617361
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    At the moment domes with a Velleman controller, mine included, can use only the LesveDome ASCOM controller. The problems with LesveDome is that the source code is unavailable, it is Windows only, and is ASCOM instead of the much more portable INDI.

    I’ve written my own Dome controller using the ASCOM Alpaca standard. My code runs on a Raspberry Pi. The Alpaca initiative is fully portable as it uses a JSON/REST API and therefore is no longer Windows COM specific.

    in reply to: Magnitude precision on BAA-VSS charts. #617287
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Ah.

    When I add a new star to my program…

    Thanks Paul,

    I call the AAVSO API to get me the VS data and the candidate comparison stars in a requested mag. range and chart width. I use the B-V from SIMBAD to give me a guide to any major differences that there might be in the B-V values of the comparison stars. It’s more of a sanity check – sometime there aren’t enough good choices to throw any out! My code then builds this info into my master variable star csv file which is read by my automated photometry routines (Python and AstroArt8). The API also returns a URI with the chart which I stream down and save as an image file. The BAA and AAVSO upload files are automatically generated.

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Magnitude precision on BAA-VSS charts. #617285
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Out of interest, what SIMBAD/VIZIER data do you use? For my purposes all that is required is the magnitudes and the coordinates, all of which is provided in a single download from AAVSO.

    I use it to get the B-V of the target star. I couldn’t find that in the AAVSO data.
    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Magnitude precision on BAA-VSS charts. #617281
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Personally I like the AAVSO charts and lists of comparison stars because it’s easy to query via my Python code via the AAVSO API. I combine that with SIMBAD/VIZIER data to get other parameters of the target star and I can then create a good list comparison stars for ensemble photometry. I just live with the chart ID warning when I upload to the BAA database.
    Cheers
    Ian.

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 110 total)