Mr Ian David Sharp

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 110 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #618737
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Last night’s results seem to suggest the start of a plateau? See attached graph.

    Best Regards
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #618691
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    In addition, I think we can make your “It’s turned back up again!” statement a little more quantitative.

    Hi Jane,

    Yes, of course my comment was conversational, if a bit glib!

    I’ve sent you a PM with the Excel file attached.

    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #618686
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    I see from the light curve the slow steady decline (~2 magnitudes in V over 70 days) has come to an end and the brightness is now dropping rapidly (~1.5 magnitudes in 12 days)

    Hi Robin,

    Yes, and it’s turned back up again! See attached graph as of last night’s data…

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #618076
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    With regard to may last post. New data from last night reveals that the slow decline continues!

    Ian.

    in reply to: Comet Section meeting. Saturday July 8. #618060
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Yes indeed, an excellent day!
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #618058
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    It’s been quite a few days since my last update but I have been manfully soldiering on measuring mags with the 3 RBV filters and I’ve barely missed a night!

    I was talking to Robin Leadbeater at the excellent BAA Comet Section Meeting yesterday whether he thought that SN 2023ixf was a Type II-L or Type II-P. We both agreed that, since there has been no sign of a plateau to-date, it must be a Type II-L. However, now I’ve added last night’s data all three colours seem to be showing the beginnings of a sharp bend to a flat line (see attached graph – look at the last 2 square points on each line).

    I’d be interested in any comments. Maybe the next couple of nights will tell!

    Best Regards
    Ian.

    in reply to: Monte Umbe Eclipse #618000
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Unfortunately I was just too young to go on the Monte Umbe trip (15y), but I was old enough to go to Earls Court to see Pink Floyd in May of ’73 to hear the whole of Dark Side of the Moon live. An eclipse is just an eclipse, but this gig will never be forgotton! I have no regrets.

    Interestingly, EMI gave a press reception at the London Planetarium in February 1973 just after the release of DSOTM, but only Richard Wright of the band attended. The others were not happy with the inferior sound system brought in by EMI. Fussy lot these rock gods

    Gary

    Indeed! I didn’t make the DSotM tour in ’73 but did go to see them at Wembley in ’74 (I was 14) thanks to a huge trip organised by our very own Dr John Mason! There were two coaches that went from the Chichester High School for Boys!

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617955
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    It’s been a few days since I posted an update on the RVB photometry of supernova SN 2023ixf in M101. I’ve been away on holiday for a few days and haven’t been able to process my observations. Here’s my updated graph which still shows a gradual decline in magnitude and a widening B-V value. My data covers nearly 40 days so far…
    I was able to control my system at Pixel Skies Astro with my phone whilst I was in a boat in the wilds of the Norfolk Broads!

    Ian.

    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    I have implemented a change to the BAA Photometry Database that should resolve this problem.

    Wow! You Sir, are a star! (a variable one?)

    I just tested it on the two sets of obs. I made the other night from the UK and Spain. I’ve attached the light-curves together in the database. Amazing, you can’t tell the difference!

    Brilliant!

    Cheers
    Ian.

    Attachments:
    in reply to: Duplicate Upload Error for two different observatories #617872
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    So it is probably worth giving this a few days as I may be able to easily make a change to the duplicate check.

    Many thanks Andy.
    Ian

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617855
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    A continuation of the animation of the spectrum. Part 2 covers 2023-05-27 to 2023-06-13 and shows the transition from an almost featureless spectrum to one showing more typical broad P Cygni Balmer lines

    Superb!

    I have attached my updated photometry graph with new data from both observatories last night (14/15 June).

    Ian.

    in reply to: Equipment available at PixelSkies #617843
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    It is run by two of the most helpful people you could wish to meet. I have nothing but good to say about the facility.

    I can second that. I’ve had a setup there for nearly 2 years. I’ve just replaced a 104mm APO with a C11.

    Ian.

    in reply to: Equipment available at PixelSkies #617831
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi Andrew,

    I saw your lovely setup during my visit there last month.

    As much as I’d love to have two piers there I don’t think I can stretch to that!

    What I can say, for others who might be looking, is that the facilities there are superb and well managed. Spotlessly clean!

    Best Regards
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617822
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Here’s my updated magnitude plot as of last night (12/13 June).

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Differences in Photometric Filter sets. #617796
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Perhaps a longer series of measurements at a very wide range of magnitudes (from 7 to 17 perhaps) of a standard field (likely a Landolt field) may be mre informative.

    Thanks Paul,

    I’ve been reading about the Landolt fields in the AAVSO Transformation process. I think I’ll try and give it a shot…

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617777
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Good morning,

    Attached is my updated graph up to last night (8/9 June).

    The B-V settled at +0.29

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617764
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Thanks for your excellent imaging and analysis of the supernova. I was wondering, how you manage to get so much data, my skies are quite cloudy and even quite windy.
    Also how do you find the M101 so accurately, which software and platesolving software do you use ?

    Hi Kwong,

    Well, I have to say that I cannot remember a clear spell like the one we are having here in the UK at the moment! I don’t want to jinx it but it has been clear almost every night for weeks! I also have a remote observatory in Spain but the weather there has been terrible for weeks!

    I acquire my images using software called Sequence Generator Pro. This does all of the scheduling for my imaging runs and I use PlateSolve2 or ASTAP for my platesolving:

    https://www.hnsky.org/astap.htm
    https://planewave.com/download/platesolve2/

    Cheers
    Ian

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617733
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Here is my updated mag graph from last night.

    B-V = +0.295

    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617672
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    Morning!

    Here’s my updated mag. graph with last night’s results.
    B-V now +0.28

    Cheers
    Ian.

    in reply to: Supernova in M101 ! #617644
    Mr Ian David Sharp
    Participant

    I’ve added last night’s data (2/3 June) – see attached graph.

    B-V = +0.26

    Cheers
    Ian.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 110 total)