Jeremy Shears

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 573 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    ASASSN has a lot of data tho none recent. The light curve varies between ca 9.2 and 9.9, mean 9.45.

    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    This sounds an intriguing event, Tim. Thanks for flagging it.

    I’m not familiar with RY CrB, so I looked it up.
    The Variable Star Index lists it as a semi-regular variable with a range 8.8 to 10.0 in V band. The period is ~90 days.

    There are no observations of it in the BAA VSS database. There are very few in AAVSO, the most recent being last August at 9.4 visual.

    I wonder if the mag 6.7 you cite is an R mag. It is a red star of spectral type M8 to 10 so will appear bright at longer wavelengths as discussed in the R Lyr thread on the Forum.

    in reply to: R Lyrae #622570
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Hello Bill,

    I looked at the BAA VSS and AAVSO data and R Lyr appears to be behaving “normally”, though the most recent data are from a week ago.
    It is a semi-regular variable (SRB), spectral type M5, hence red as you found. The amplitude is small: 3.81 – 4.44 V.
    The V-I is ~2.5 mag (brighter in IR than visual) – this varies a bit, in time with its overall brightness variations.
    I can’t see any spectra in the BAA database.

    As you say, these meteor cameras can very red sensitive.

    Whilst you have your binoculars out (you don’t need such large ones, though these are good to pick up the colour, and you might be able to use naked eye), why not have a go at estimating its brightness to check where its at now? Chart here: https://britastro.org/vss/xchartcat/R%20Lyr%20330%2001.gif

    Finally, I note that R Lyr was discovered by the Mancunian, Joseph Baxendell in 1856.

    JS

    in reply to: Commons committee enquiry into UK astronomy #622564
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Very well done, David. Good interplay between you and Chris Lintott, too.

    in reply to: Preparing for the eruption of T CrB #622525
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Nice work Max!

    in reply to: Bad eclipse viewing advice #622502
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Where would we be without such helpful advice?
    I was staying at a Texas ranch a mile off the main road and a local drove along an adjacent unmade track during totality, but at least they had their headlights on!

    in reply to: Observing Vulcan at the eclipse next week #622361
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    There are several other choice publications on today’s ArXiv listing. I like:

    “I’m in AGNi: A new standard for AGN pluralisation”
    and
    “Multi-Messenger Astrology“

    in reply to: N 2024 Oph (V4370) #622217
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Hello Stewart,

    I was looking at Mazin Younis’s fine image of the nova (https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20240316_060436_8e8e3dc829f92b9d) and noticed it was a busy field, yet the VSP chart shows no bright stars that might contaminate the photometry aperture. The nearest is 113, but that’s still a fair distance. What does a visual sense check of the image suggest relative to the comps: 12 or 13.5?

    The most recent obs at 13.2V on March 16.792, though that observer seems to report almost a mag brighter than others. What is the time of your observation compare? And just to confirm you deployed a V filter (the nova is much brighter in R).

    JS

    in reply to: Preparing for the eruption of T CrB #622140
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Johnson B
    J2000.0
    15 59 30.16 +25 55 12.6

    in reply to: The monkey’s telescope – a mystery #622055
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Here is the relevant part of the painting, from the paper

    Attachments:
    in reply to: The monkey’s telescope – a mystery #622054
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    yes, its a different painting. Apparently monkeys like optics.
    Here’s a direct link to the paper: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2403/2403.02857.pdf

    in reply to: Preparing for the eruption of T CrB #622046
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Great to see you following T CrB, Max. As you say, it looks like a smooth hump.

    in reply to: Betelgeuse #621989
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Costantino Sigismondi reports Betelgeuse is dimming and is now as faint as it has been for two years:
    https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=16501

    whilst nothing like as faint as it got during the great dimming of a few years ago, it’s worth keeping an eye on as Orion dips towards the west.

    in reply to: The Moon comes to Cheadle and Mary Adela Blagg #621988
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    As part of the project, the organising team has prepared an educational package for children about Mary’s life and astronomical interest: https://outsidearts.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/MB-Teaching-Resource-Final-Version.pdf

    I note from the Historical Section newsletter that Mike Frost will be speaking at the Cheadle event on Friday March 29 at 4pm on “Cheadle Moon, BAA Pioneering Women”.

    in reply to: Request for observations of the nearby supernova SN 2024cld #621874
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Great capture Alan. I think it’s flipped E-W

    in reply to: Request for observations of the nearby supernova SN 2024cld #621867
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    I’ve not seen any recent imaging or photometry, which I think is why Tom Killestein is calling for observations.
    It is located 15″.8 west and 0″.3 south of the center of NGC 6004.
    This is a pretty faint SN (mag 17.4 at discovery), so you will need a fairly large telescope and long exposures (minutes). The London skies won’t help, but give it a try – you never know what you might turn up.

    in reply to: February JBAA #621747
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    My Journal arrived this morning. I suppose it might have been delivered earlier, but this is the first Royal Mail delivery in my area this week. We have been lucky to get 3 deliveries a week for the last year. Thank goodness for the digital edition!

    in reply to: Recurrent Nova RS Oph #621721
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    You wait ages and two recurrent nova remnant papers come up in the same week!

    This MNRAS submission is on the RN T Pyx. The title is “3D physical structure and angular expansion of the remnant of the recurrent nova T Pyx”: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07879

    The last eruption of T Pyx was in 2011. The remnant has a bipolar structure. The expansion velocity is ~460 km/s.

    in reply to: Recurrent Nova RS Oph #621681
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    Couldn’t they pick a more confusing name for the NSR? Thank you very much for the link to ArXiv, Jeremy.

    Spot on Max. I tripped myself up over the name a few times!

    in reply to: Recurrent Nova RS Oph #621651
    Jeremy Shears
    Participant

    An MNRAS preprint on ArXiv today (https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05855) describes the discovery of a nova super-remnant (NSR) cavity surrounding RS Ophiuchi. The team from Liverpool John Moores and Royal Observatory Edinburgh used archival FIR images from IRAS.

    An NSR is a vast extended shell surrounding a recurrent nova (RN) formed by the cumulative effect of eruptions sweeping up local interstellar medium. It is speculated that all RNe should result in an NSR, but the only other one confirmed so far is that associated with M31N 2008-12a, in the Andromeda Galaxy, which is the most frequently erupting RN.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 573 total)