Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Oliver,
I’m not an expert on polar aligning (being mainly a visual alt-az user), but my understanding for drift alignment is that you should choose an alignment star near the celestial equator and your meridian, so this maximises the effect of the drift, which will be minimal if you choose Polaris(?).
Clear skies. Callum
Another option is USB over Ethernet – i’ve not tried it but have been told it works well.. YMMV.
Callum
Hi Dominic,
For the widefield Lovejoy and winter dso’s that Ian took from Spain at the beginning of the year, these were with 50mm to 200mm lenses, and Canon 6D camera, and using an Astrotrac mount – according to Ian’s notes.
Callum
Hi Roger,
i’ve not come across anyone using this for wide-field imaging, if that is what you are thinking of.
The ‘trackers’ like the iOptron Sky Tracker and the Vixen Polarie are both popular, and the Astrotrak gives good results.
What are you wanting to do with the setup, and why looking for Goto?
Callum
I caught up with Cameron on Friday evening when I gave a talk at Coventry & Warwickshire AS – he’d recently taken delivery of his new scope – but plumped for something different, a second hand GSO 8″ F4 imaging newtonian.
Will be interesting to see what results he gets with that.
Callum
We had good conditions in Cheltenham until about 10:00 UT – when it clouded out. Though seems to have been locally a bit variable – my wife decided to stay home where it was cloudy and then cleared towards the end… I was so busy at the viewing event, though, I did not get much chance to take many photos…
I’ve posted some pics and chat at: http://starlightnights.com/callump/2015/03/the-uks-partial-solar-eclipse/
Callum
I was wondering if Denis’ meteor camera caught it – though maybe he points in a different direction…
Callum
Most of my experiments with a DSLR were with camera lenses on an old Canon 300d – so widefield mainly using fixed focus lenses – 8mm, 50mm and 85mm.
I found images were always better with dark frame subtraction.
I was never really sure how to do flat fields for ‘wide-field’ lenses – so never did.
I did use processing techniques for ‘synthetic’ flats, though, using IRIS.I have a new camera, Canon 600d, now, but not done much with it so far.
I expect it has much lower noise that the 300d, but whether it is neglible in exposures from 5s to 10s I have yet to measure.Callum.
Hi Jeremy,
if you select the text and use the link tool on the editor bar above (first line) you should be able to fix up the link. e.g.
http://www.britastro.org/vss/CSS%202126%20campaign_20140511%20(1).pdf
Cheers, Callum
Thanks Mike – i guess for many of us of a certain age Pluto will always hold a fascination.
For those not keeping up to date with my blog here is an image of Pluto on 30 July and 1st August.
I’m not sure the orientation is right – as Martin Mobberley points out iTelescope T18 has a “weird PA”. I think North is at about 1 o’clock…
Hi Cameron,
that’s a really nice image. I do like dso’s in their stary context like this, and you have nicely managed to capture the ‘wings’ which are often missed. Nice structure too.
Well done.
Looking forward to seeing more.
Clear skies, Callum
I guess because they were originally made by Coronado, and they used their own tooling… Probably never been changed to use ‘standard’ Meade threads.
Maybe you could find someone with a broken PST available for spares?
Cheers, Callum
Hi Terry,
you could see if you could borrow a Meade star diagonal or focusser and see if the thumbscrew from that fits yours – at least then you would have a screw to compare against.
Most of these thumbscrews seem to be a bit non-standard to me… Though I must admit I have never measured one.
Callum
From a chromatic aberration point of view probably not – but many prefer wider fields of view, and ‘better’ eyepieces may be better constructed, with better coatings.
I usually use my TV plossls on my Lunt solar scope – i quite like the combination.
Zoom eyepieces seem to be quite popular too, though I don’t have one.
Sunny Skies, Callum
